We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Digital.ai Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."
"The features and technologies are very good. The flexibility and the roadmap have also been very good. They're at the forefront of delivering the additional capabilities that are required with cloud delivery, etc. Their ability to deliver what customers require and when they require is very important."
"The setup is fairly easy. We didn't struggle with the process at all."
"Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before."
"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."
"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."
"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."
"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."
"They can support the remaining languages that are currently not supported. They can also create a different model that can identify zero-day attacks. They can work on different patterns to identify and detect zero-day vulnerability attacks."
"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."
"As the solution becomes more complex and feature rich, it takes more time to debug and resolve problems. Feature-wise, we have no complaints, but Checkmarx becomes harder to maintain as the product becomes more complex. When I talk to support, it takes them longer to fix the problem than it used to."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
"They could work to improve the user interface. Right now, it really is lacking."
"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."
"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."
"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."
"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.