Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Cisco Threat Grid comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (9th), Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th)
Cisco Threat Grid
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
31st
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Threat Grid is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

NareshKumar10 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhanced Internal Security and Efficiency
Check Point Security Management can be improved by addressing a negative challenge I face: sometimes it does not show internet utilization in the GUI. When I ask support, they tell me to upgrade the firmware, which happens quite frequently. Since I deployed the device in my on-premises environment 1.5 years ago, I have experienced this issue three times. Check Point Security Management has not impacted my daily work or decision-making in any negative way. As an IT person, I occasionally need to check how much internet bandwidth has been used in the internal network over the past month, day, or week. During those times, when I open the data utilization column, it shows nothing available. Each time this happens, I need to upgrade to the latest version of the firmware, and this frequent updating affects my productivity negatively. If Check Point addresses this issue in the future, it will be beneficial for all customers using Check Point SMBs.
Hasan A. Abu Al-Rob - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution is easy to implement, but the scalability and technical support must be improved
The solution is used for endpoint security The simplicity of implementation is valuable. The way the management file is integrated into the environment must be improved. Currently, I am using the solution. The tool is stable. We did not have any issues with it. I rate the tool’s scalability a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's already helped secure our organization effectively."
"The control is granular, so you can set policy profiles for different organizational profiles."
"The tool is cost-effective."
"The Check Point Management server is isolated from security gateways, which means that in case there is an issue, we have our configuration ready and we can directly replace the device and push the configuration."
"We can easily push the policies to any of our gateways."
"The centralized logs and management are helpful."
"The company uses software called Harmony. Check Point integrates nicely, whether on an endpoint or mobile device. It integrates well with the firewall and can give me reports that I can check without going to an online portal."
"The SSL VPN monitoring based on users and tunnel monitoring are great value-added features present in the management console."
"It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
 

Cons

"It would be helpful if we could enable URL and application traffic control remote access."
"Some of the configuration elements could be improved."
"The reporting should be improved in future releases. It needs to be very explicit. This is very important."
"In my experience, the place they can improve the most is in the technical support where I have had some serious problems that could not be solved in time due to a lack of knowledge of the assigned engineer."
"I've found the solution was a bit unstable."
"In the future, I would like to see more frequent updates because of the changing security landscape."
"They could offer educational courses to help individuals improve their knowledge and skills."
"They need to make a Mac version of the SmartConsole, in my opinion."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"Support must be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one will be very expensive, and ten means low price, I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten."
"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
"The solution is expensive."
"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
"If I remember correctly, the licensing cost is a little bit higher than that of the competitor."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
I see areas of improvement for Check Point Security Management such as GUI stability and performance, and simplified firmware upgrades. I and my colleagues occasionally report glitches or missing d...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
My main use case for Check Point Security Management is to unify firewall and threat prevention policies across multiple international sites, so I use SmartConsole to streamline rule updates and mo...
What do you like most about Cisco Threat Grid?
The simplicity of implementation is valuable.
What needs improvement with Cisco Threat Grid?
The way the management file is integrated into the environment must be improved.
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
Threat Grid, ThreatGrid
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Center for Internet Security (CIS), ADP
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Cisco Threat Grid and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,140 professionals have used our research since 2012.