Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 5, 2025
Check Point SandBlast Network and ThreatLocker are security solutions competing in threat prevention. Check Point SandBlast Network seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive zero-day threat prevention capabilities.
Features: Check Point SandBlast Network includes features like zero-day protection, Threat Extraction to remove malicious content from documents, and AI-engine integration for rapid threat response. It provides sandboxing and email protection, helping users stay updated with new threats. ThreatLocker focuses on application control through allowlisting, ring-fencing to control application permissions, and selective elevation for specific processes. It emphasizes ease of use, offering real-time access control management and blocking unauthorized applications effectively.
Room for Improvement: Users of Check Point SandBlast Network suggest improving file handling for unsupported types, enhancing compatibility with various traffic types, and optimizing user guides. They also wish for expanded third-party integrations and better sandboxing performance. ThreatLocker users desire better training and documentation, enhanced deployment flexibility, and improved integration with existing systems. While both platforms need UI enhancements, Check Point focuses on performance, and ThreatLocker emphasizes usability across devices.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point SandBlast Network typically operates in hybrid and on-premise environments, providing robust network protection but with traditional customer support that may be slow and complex. ThreatLocker offers flexible deployments across private and public clouds for quicker implementations. Users find ThreatLocker’s support responsive, desiring more direct tool integration for easier management. Check Point’s support is better at incident handling, while ThreatLocker excels in adaptability and faster responses.
Pricing and ROI: Pricing for Check Point SandBlast Network is higher, requiring distinct licenses for advanced features like Threat Extraction. Despite the cost, it provides solid ROI by reducing risks. ThreatLocker is praised for reasonable pricing, viewed as cost-effective for reducing redundancy and consolidating security tools. While both offer measurable ROI through improved security, ThreatLocker’s budget-friendly pricing model leads to broader adoption among small to mid-sized enterprises.
