No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Check Point Infinity vs DataDome comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Infinity
Ranking in AI Security
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (9th), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (6th), AI Observability (5th)
DataDome
Ranking in AI Security
20th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
3.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Bot Management (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the AI Security category, the mindshare of Check Point Infinity is 0.5%. The mindshare of DataDome is 0.4%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Check Point Infinity0.5%
DataDome0.4%
Other99.1%
AI Security
 

Featured Reviews

RL
TI at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Helps prevent advanced threats and reduce incident response times through unified security policies
The best feature Check Point Infinity offers for me is threat prevention, which is effective at blocking malware, ransomware, and phishing, as well as preventing zero-day attacks before they reach users or systems. For our team, the threat prevention in Check Point Infinity works by layering multiple defenses that stop attacks before they reach users or systems, and the most effective feature for us is the specific SandBlast Zero-Day Prevention, which uses advanced sandboxing and threat emulation to detonate suspicious files in a safe environment. Check Point Infinity has impacted my organization positively, as I have seen a reduction in security incidents and response times, with threats that used to slip through different point solutions now being blocked automatically thanks to the unified prevention layers.
Arka Sarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Solution Support Development Engineer at Ericsson Global
Real-time bot defense has protected telecom APIs and now keeps customer logins secure
While DataDome performs very well overall, there are a few areas where improvements would make it even more effective in a telecom environment. One point is better handling of false positives. Although it is generally very accurate, in some cases, legitimate users or internal systems get flagged, especially corporate VPN users, internal testing tools, and partner integrations. The improvement would be a more granular and easier whitelisting mechanism and better transparency on why a request was blocked. Another point is more detailed analytics and custom reporting. The current dashboards are good, but sometimes detailed analysis is limited. Custom reporting options are not very flexible. As part of improvement, more customizable dashboards can be made, along with the ability to create business-specific reports, for each API and per region. Better visibility for API-level protection can also be developed. The protection works well, but debugging blocked API requests can take time and is not always easy to trace the exact reason for blocking, thus requiring more detailed logs and traceability for API traffic, along with easier correlation with backend systems. The integration with the existing security ecosystem can also be improved.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is a scalable product."
"The Infinity portal combines all Check Point solutions in one place, including the endpoint, SASE, and the SMP."
"Infinity has come to give us total protection."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. Stability is always important. I haven't faced any issues with the Infinity Portal in the last six or seven years."
"It has come to reinforce the security architecture of the organization since it covers all the necessary pieces of security."
"Check Point Infinity has impacted my organization positively, as I have seen a reduction in security incidents and response times, with threats that used to slip through different point solutions now being blocked automatically thanks to the unified prevention layers."
"We are fully satisfied with the abilities it provides and the general approach of the Check Point solutions."
"New Check Point technologies can be found via this portal."
"The main improvements have been better protection, reduced operational noise, improved system stability, and lower manual effort in handling bot-related incidents."
"After implementing DataDome, we observed measurable improvements across security, performance, and user experience."
"The most valuable feature of DataDome is the traffic analysis."
 

Cons

"The management console has given us some trouble, and the documentation is a little bit rigid in its solution paths."
"One area where Check Point Infinity could be improved is its user interface. It brings together a lot of powerful features, but sometimes the console feels overwhelming and requires extra time to navigate."
"They need to update the guides."
"I think Check Point Infinity could be improved in terms of documentation. I need more images and pictures, and the steps should be more intuitive."
"The updates could be less frequent."
"One of the main improvements that can be made is the latency in the portal."
"Check Point Infinity is not compatible with Windows 8."
"The improvements needed for Check Point Infinity include that the documentation is not intuitive, and we needed more pictures or steps to make it more intuitive for all people when deploying it for the first time."
"With DataDome, the biggest friction points we experienced were mostly around tuning and visibility during the early phase."
"While DataDome performs very well overall, there are a few areas where improvements would make it even more effective in a telecom environment."
"DataDome does not catch legitimate IPs during traffic analysis, even when the traffic exceeds the threshold value."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of Check Point Infinity could be better. There is a license needed to use the solution and we pay annually."
"Check Point should provide an enterprise-wide license where the organization should be provided free hand of using any license or services for an agreed period of time (EULA)."
"The solution's price is quite high, and the licensing model requires extra licenses for various features like SD-WAN."
"I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The flexibility in pricing is advantageous, and being a special partner allows for negotiating special rates based on the project requirements."
"The product has good pricing considering the features and a global approach."
"When it comes to price, the paramount consideration is the strength of the security. If the security measures provided by the product, such as Check Point Infinity, are robust and meet our requirements, price becomes a secondary concern."
"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Security solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Security Firm
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business39
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Infinity?
Check Point Infinity could be improved with more intuitive documentation.
What is your primary use case for Check Point Infinity?
Check Point Infinity is used primarily for consolidating security across networks, including cloud and on-premise, and endpoints under one architecture. It is relied upon most for unified threat pr...
What advice do you have for others considering Check Point Infinity?
Check Point Infinity offers easy management, a centralized security tool, and excellent pricing. The review rating for Check Point Infinity is 9 out of 10.
What needs improvement with DataDome?
While DataDome performs very well overall, there are a few areas where improvements would make it even more effective in a telecom environment. One point is better handling of false positives. Alth...
What is your primary use case for DataDome?
In my organization, the primary use case of DataDome is end-to-end observability across telecom applications and infrastructure, especially for real-time network services and customer-facing system...
What advice do you have for others considering DataDome?
I believe I have added enough information. The most valuable feature for our organization is DataDome's real-time bot detection and mitigation. Since our applications like login and recharge APIs a...
 

Also Known As

R80, Infinity
DataDome Bot Protect with Agent Trust
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edel AG
Rakuten, TripAdvisor, Adevinta, Classmates, BlaBlaCar, Veepee, ...
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Infinity vs. DataDome and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.