Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection &amp; Response comparison

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

8th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

9th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

35th

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.0%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Alejandro Flores.

Director de Ingenieria at Smartelecom SA de CV

Good visibility with cloud centralized management and several layers of security

There are some "weak points" that have to be mentioned, including: 1) If the IT department is used to "cloning" endpoints (making images) you are going to have a hard time trying to install the product and you are going to end up reading a lot of Check Point documents. 2) If you are used to the granularity of roles features in Check Point Quantums products you are going to be a little bit disappointed. You can't set customized roles with customized read/write permissions. 3) You need a mature security team to manage this solution in order to get the most value from it.

Read full review

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important characteristic of our requirements was the implementation of disk encryption."

"It's pretty complete for preventing threats to endpoints. Its capabilities are great."

"We're able to secure all endpoints and manage them from a single console."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with CheckPoint's firewalls. You can have one port, and follow the logs from both Endpoint and firewall security."

"The solution has good threat intelligence features."

"The zero-day threat prevention is excellent."

"It monitors data flow across the networking system to enhance comprehensive workflow infrastructure."

"The license plans are also very nice and distributed - allowing for a separation between types of users with more basic or more advanced options."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pros

"The interface is user-friendly."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

"The most valuable feature is the capability of the command used by the machine so that we see the kind of performance that is running."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"The initial setup is not overly complicated."

"We didn't have the visibility that we now have. It has increased our visibility by a lot. So, we put a lot more time into really looking at our environment and what is happening throughout our different networks. It has increased our visibility by around fivefold."

"Cybereason absolutely enables us to mitigate and isolate on the fly. Our managed detection response telemetry has dropped dramatically since we began using it. It's very top-of-mind. We were running some tabletop exercises and none of the detections were getting triggered by the managed security services provider. So we needed to find a solution that would trigger high-fidelity alerts. That was Cybereason and it dramatically changed our landscape from the detection and response perspective."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

Cons

"For the future, I would like to see maybe a content-filtering emulation feature in Harmony Endpoint."

"I think some work needs to be done to improve the integration with other third-party products, namely SIEM solutions."

"We know that Check Point has a very good database about threats even Check Point tries to make this EDR stable still there are some issues we were facing after upgrading or taking TAC to help its got resolved but Check Point really needs to work on metadata."

"Its guides are identical to the existing ones. These guides should be updated and they should improve their design."

"The remote deployment with Check Point Endpoint Security requires improvement. We have to depend on some of their deployment tools. I would like a system endpoint protection management tool or a remote deployment tool."

"There was a learning curve for our general population of employees (the user)."

"One area that requires improvement is the amount of audit logs the system can save, as it is currently limited to fourteen days."

"If you're using an endpoint that does not have sufficient resources, it would be very tough to use."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint cons

"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"I feel that the product lacks reporting features and needs improvement."

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"The product's reporting isn't great."

"The integration with Microsoft solutions and Microsoft capabilities needs to be improved."

"Ad hoc higher-level reporting to senior management can be improved or can be implemented. That's definitely an area of improvement that they need to focus on."

"I would like to see improvements on the operational side, specifically in grouping."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In comparison to other software solutions available on the market, it comes at a higher price point."

"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It costs around ₱2,200 per endpoint."

"The tool’s cost has increased by almost 300% in two years."

"Initial monies replacing all AVs with a single product is about £10k."

"The solution is reasonable, but there are cheaper solutions out there."

"In addition to the standard licensing fees, there is a cost for support."

"Check Point Harmony Endpoint is cost effective."

"The cost is huge compared to other products that are available on market."

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint pricing and cost advice

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"I do not have experience with the licensing of the product."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

The platform's most valuable features are the ability to build API, which meets our business requirements, and the VPN client, which provides VPN access from a single client.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

The price for Check Point Harmony Endpoint ( /products/check-point-harmony-endpoint-reviews ) is good considering the services it offers. It is not expensive and provides comprehensive coverage.

What needs improvement with Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

One area that requires improvement is the amount of audit logs the system can save, as it is currently limited to fourteen days.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 9% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Compared 5% of the time

More Check Point Harmony Endpoint Competitors

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 28% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 2% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point Harmony Endpoint

Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Also Known As

Check Point Endpoint Security, Endpoint Security, Check Point SandBlast Agent

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Overview

Check Point Harmony Endpoint integrates security solutions, allowing comprehensive protection against cyber threats. It's designed to suit enterprise-scale operations with robust features for threat prevention and management.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers advanced security capabilities that prioritize threat analysis, detection, and prevention. Tailored for professional environments, it provides tools to handle endpoint vulnerabilities effectively. Its user-centric design ensures that IT teams can manage network security with streamlined operations. Continuous updates and threat intelligence are offered to counter emerging threats, and its deployment is optimized for ease of use.

What are the key features of Check Point Harmony Endpoint?

Threat Intelligence: Delivers real-time insights into new and existing threats.
Forensics: Offers detailed analysis of incidents to understand and mitigate risks.
Endpoint Threat Hunting: Empowers proactive search for advanced threats.
Automated Response: Integrates response mechanisms to reduce incident impact.
Zero Trust Architecture: Implements controls for verified access at every endpoint.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs by minimizing security breaches.
Enhanced Security: Protects data integrity and privacy across endpoints.
User Productivity: Limits interruptions and maintains business continuity.
Scalability: Grows with organizational needs without compromising on performance.
Compliance Assurance: Aids in meeting regulatory and security compliance standards.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Check Point Harmony Endpoint is deployed to secure sensitive data and protect against sector-specific threats. Its flexibility allows adaptation to meet industry standards, ensuring critical infrastructures maintain operational security without hindrance.

Check Point Software Technologies

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Sample Customers

Boston Properties, Independence Care System, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre (MCEC), Courtagen Life Sciences, Carmel Partners

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response