We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration and SUSE NeuVector based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is highly regarded for its seamless integration through APIs and robust protection against social engineering. SUSE NeuVector impressed users with its comprehensive array of features and automation capabilities. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration could improve integration with various SaaS solutions and do a better job of incorporating other threat clouds and AI engines. Users would like SUSE NeuVector to add support for scanning IaaS and virtual machines and improve its integration with other security tools in a hybrid environment.
Service and Support: While some users praised Check Point support for its quick responses and dependable services, others reported slow response time and complained about the lack of support in languages other than English. SUSE NeuVector's customer support is regarded as supportive and well-informed, but a few reviewers found the support process to be complex.
Ease of Deployment: Setting up Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is considered straightforward. Users found the configuration to be fast and received helpful guidance during complex integrations. The initial setup for SUSE NeuVector can vary in difficulty depending on the environment and project complexity. Integration with pipelines can be challenging and may require custom scripts. SUSE NeuVector users reported deployment times ranging from two or three days to two weeks.
Pricing: The licensing model of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is considered cost-effective and straightforward. Users also praised the efficient renewal and licensing process. Some SUSE NeuVector users consider the solution to be inexpensive. Others believe there is room for improvement.
ROI: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration delivers a superior ROI by offering valuable features and support for cloud functionalities. Some users said SUSE NeuVector offers the most ROI when deployed in high-risk industries, but it may not be as advantageous for some sectors, such as retail.
Comparison Results: Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is preferred over SUSE NeuVector. Check Point Harmony stands out for its seamless integration with different platforms and advanced protection against social engineering attacks. Users find the setup process for Check Point Harmony to be straightforward, whereas SUSE NeuVector's setup can be challenging at times.
"The most valuable feature of the solution is the phishing protection it offers."
"As with most of the other Check Point products, the CloudGuard SaaS has the advanced visibility of the events and alerts."
"The solution helps to block spam emails."
"The product is reliable and sturdy."
"The first most remarkable thing is the integration with the Office 365 solution, which is easy, fast, and totally transparent for the user."
"The automated rule cleanups and automated policy installs have improved my customers' organizations."
"It is fast and has a very simple, easy integration."
"Based on domain and URL reputation, it will allow traffic to flow."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"I would like Check Point to extend its coverage to include more cloud applications."
"Support can be a bit quicker in helping the customer."
"There are sometimes leakages of viruses when the system is experiencing network failures."
"Other vendor support teams go after fixing the issue the moment that they join the remote session. The problem that I have faced with Check Point support is that they share the case number with me, then it takes at least two days for them to join a remote session with us, even though we have asked for this timeframe to change. Even though we have already explained the problems that we are facing or the business pain points in our network on the call or email, we have to repeat the problem statements again in the console. It can take four or five days to resolve the issue from the moment they understand the problem. This includes the time to teach their R&D or internal team whatever the issue is. I have faced timeframes as long as seven to 10 days for fixing some issues."
"The implementation could definitely be better."
"Check Point Infinity Portal sometimes feels a bit slow, and there are performance issues that should be easy to fix."
"Some undefined threats can bypass the security system when there is a networking failure in the organization."
"if a phishing email were to get through and bypass the product — which very few do — it would be nice if, when a user clicked on that phishing email, they got a second-chance opportunity, a chance to double-check that they really wanted to proceed to that website."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
More Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is ranked 8th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 47 reviews while SUSE NeuVector is ranked 15th in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) with 7 reviews. Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is rated 8.8, while SUSE NeuVector is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration writes "Has a user-friendly dashboard, a great anti-phishing algorithm, and sandboxing for testing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SUSE NeuVector writes "Good value for money; great for policy management". Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Mimecast Email Security and Cisco Secure Email, whereas SUSE NeuVector is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Sysdig Falco and Sysdig Secure. See our Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs. SUSE NeuVector report.
See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.