Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Egress Prevent comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony Email &...
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (9th)
Egress Prevent
Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
55th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration is 1.6%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Egress Prevent is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
 

Featured Reviews

Nasseer Qureshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Email security effectively detects a wide range of threats and improves productivity
Since we have been using Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration for a year, we haven't encountered significant challenges. However, it would be beneficial if it could support other email security services beyond Microsoft and Google. Integration with other platforms would enhance its appeal since the features are commendable. While the analytics are commendable, they don't provide deep dive insights. They show the overall counts of malware, phishing, and business compromise emails, but there isn't a robust ability to dive deeper into those categories to see specifics. Analytics should allow us to explore which users received malware emails the most or trends among departments. Currently, we have to sift through manually, which is not ideal. A more profound analytical capability would elevate the tool to become the complete email security solution for any user.
Use Egress Prevent?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Harmony Email & Office?
Pricing is a bit expensive, but it is worth it considering the features that Check Point provides.
What is your primary use case for Check Point Harmony Email & Office?
The main use case for Check Point Harmony ( /products/avaya-workforce-engagement-reviews ) Email & Collaboration is to protect incoming and outgoing emails. We use Microsoft Office 365 ( /produ...
What do you like most about Check Point Harmony Email & Office?
The product offers good and easy integration capabilities with other products.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard, Check Point CloudGuard SaaS , Check Point Harmony Email & Office
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Helvetia, Denham Capital, Daymark Solutions, Neopharm Group
* **Google** * **Microsoft** * **Amazon Web Services** * **IBM** * **Oracle** * **SAP** * **Salesforce** * **Adobe** * **Cisco** * **Dell EMC** * **HPE** * **VMware** * **Atlassian** * **Intuit** * **ServiceNow** * **Workday** * **Zoom** * **Twilio** * **Palo Alto Networks** * **Cloudflare** * **Zscaler** * **Check Point** * **Kaspersky** * **McAfee** * **Trend Micro** * **Sophos** * **Bitdefender** * **Avast** * **AVG** * **Norton**
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Zscaler, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.