Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs OpenText Connected MX comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Mobile Data Protection category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 10.0, while OpenText is ranked #7. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 8.8% mindshare in MDP, compared to OpenText’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Read 16 Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade reviews

552 Views
254 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Connected MX

Read 2 OpenText Connected MX reviews

211 Views
211 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

OpenText Connected MX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

OpenText Connected MX and Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade are data security products. OpenText has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Check Point excels in security features.

Features: OpenText Connected MX offers seamless file synchronization, centralized data management, and ease of access. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade provides robust encryption, comprehensive endpoint security, and advanced data protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Connected MX is noted for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade involves a complex setup but benefits from strong technical support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Connected MX generally offers lower setup costs, resulting in quicker ROI. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade requires a higher initial investment but offers substantial long-term security benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. OpenText Connected MX Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. OpenText Connected MX

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Full Disk Encry...

Ranking in Mobile Data Protection

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Encryption (7th)

OpenText Connected MX

Ranking in Mobile Data Protection

7th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Mobile Data Protection category, the mindshare of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is 8.8%, up from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Connected MX is 6.9%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile Data Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade	8.8%
OpenText Connected MX	6.9%
Other	84.3%

Mobile Data Protection

Featured Reviews

Danit Sannikov

Project manager at SII

Can be well-integrated with the existing systems in a company and is very intuitive to use

I once faced a problem with the tool, but I remember that I managed to work without a VPN, and then the problem with the product was sorted out somehow. An option to connect not only with the username and password but also through SMS in an easy manner is something that needs to be added to the tool. When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive. In other platforms, the user will have two options to connect, one of which is with a username and password, and the other one is with an SMS.

Read full review

Muntasir Ibrahim

ICT Vendor Specialist at Asb

A backup solution that offers very good integration at a good price

We primarily use the solution as a backup for our entire environment. The integration features are the most valuable. The integration is specific to each solution. It works well with SQL and Oracle databases and so on. On the exchange server, you do not have the best options for adjusting your…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It keeps the devices well monitored."

"The solution provides complete security for one's workstation."

"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."

"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."

"It is a cross-platform tool."

"The encryption ensures each of our drives is not invasive and that the user does not have a bad experience even while the drive is being encrypted."

"The most valuable feature of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is hard disk protection."

"It helps us maximize the operational efficiency and performance of our activities."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade pros

"The integration features are the most valuable. The integration is specific to each solution. It works well with SQL and Oracle databases and so on."

Cons

"The cost of maintaining the system is high for personal use."

"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."

"There are a few cases of security breaches when the networking system fails and can lead to malware attacks. The next release should focus more on data virtualization and support for all computing devices."

"In the future, I would like to see is the ability to decrypt equipment."

"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."

"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."

"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."

"When I changed the way I connect to the tool to the SMS option, I did it because I bought a new phone, and it had a problem connecting with the tool, after which I had to go to the settings to change it, so I felt it was not very intuitive."

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade cons

"On the exchange server, you do not have the best options for adjusting your mailbox. This feature is not included. Also, disaster recovery backups can be improved. Some other solutions, such as HP Data Protector, have more features."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As it costs $125 per workstation per year, something which is above the price of what the competition is charging, the solution is definitely too expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Data Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

I use the solution when working outside my office. The tool is for VPNs, so I can connect to the Office Cloud.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade?

The product does not involve data protection since it is used for connection purposes only. The product might have something for data protection that I might not know about since I am not a profess...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft BitLocker vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 50% of the time

McAfee Complete Data Protection vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 28% of the time

WinMagic SecureDoc vs Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

Compared 22% of the time

More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Competitors

Sophos SafeGuard vs OpenText Connected MX

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText Connected MX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade

January 2026

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade report

Download Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Data Protection

December 2025

Download OpenText Connected MX product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Connected MX, HPE Connected MX

Overview

The Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade provides automatic security for all information on endpoint hard drives, including user data, operating system files and temporary and erased files. For maximum data protection, multi-factor pre-boot authentication ensures user identity, while encryption prevents data loss from theft.
Learn more about Full disk encryption.

Check Point Software Technologies

OpenText Connected MX is a Policy-based endpoint protection that enable each user to protect, view, and manage information on all the endpoint devices they own and the sync folder with a single user account with rule-based file sync and sharing which Unifies backup, sync, and sharing capabilities in a single platform, delivering complete protection of mobile information while improving mobile workforce productivity. It provides Information visibility and accessibility that Enables information accessibility on any device by authorized users with support for Windows, Apple, Android, iOS, and Web browsers. And it Delivers secure mobile information protection and access through encryption, granular data privileges, and federated authentication.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)

Qlik

Buyer's Guide

Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. OpenText Connected MX

December 2025

Free Report: Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. OpenText Connected MX

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. OpenText Connected MX and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade vs. OpenText Connected MX report.

See our list of best Mobile Data Protection vendors.

We monitor all Mobile Data Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.