We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and GitHub Advanced Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspection."
"The solution offers sophisticated security techniques with unique characteristics that can be particularly valuable for the financial sector, which is where we develop apps."
"The most effective CloudGuard feature for threat prevention is its web app protection."
"The most valuable feature we have found in Check Point CloudGuard WAF is its rich logging capabilities."
"The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected."
"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."
"User attitude reviews help us keep all online users compliant with company regulations and policies."
"It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system."
"It ensures user passwords or sensitive information are not accidentally exposed in code or reports."
"The product's most valuable features are security scan, dependency scan, and cost-effectiveness."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution as it can handle new applications along with the analysis part."
"Dependency scanning is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable is the developer experience and the extensibility of the overall ecosystem."
"GitHub provides advanced security, which is why the customers choose this tool; it allows them to rely solely on GitHub as one platform for everything they need."
"I advise proactive threat detection intelligence offline, which can also help monitor and ensure system checks and compliances are in place."
"The documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly."
"There should be automation of threat detection, risk mitigation, and report generation."
"Improving the process for handling licensing renewals would be a welcome enhancement."
"They need improved latency in the main window."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security needs to improve updates on integrations. It also needs to incorporate real-time monitoring features."
"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."
"We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients."
"The report limitations are the main issue."
"The customizations are a little bit difficult."
"There could be DST features included in the product."
"There could be a centralized dashboard to view reports of all the projects on one platform."
"A more refined approach, categorizing and emphasizing specific vulnerabilities, would be beneficial."
"The deployment part of the product is an area of concern that needs to be made easier from an improvement perspective."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while GitHub Advanced Security is ranked 14th in Application Security Tools with 6 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while GitHub Advanced Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub Advanced Security writes "A tool that provides ease of integration with the set of existing codes in an infrastructure". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube and Checkmarx One, whereas GitHub Advanced Security is most compared with SonarQube, Snyk, Veracode, Fortify on Demand and Checkmarx One. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. GitHub Advanced Security report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
