Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Contrast Security Protect comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Contrast Security are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Contrast Security is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Contrast Security’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Contrast Security users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 48 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

1,844 Views
443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Contrast Security Protect

Read 3 Contrast Security Protect reviews

728 Views
706 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Contrast Security Protect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Contrast Security Protect and Check Point CloudGuard WAF are leading solutions in web application security. User reviews suggest Contrast Security Protect holds the upper hand in pricing and support, while Check Point CloudGuard WAF is preferred for its feature-rich capabilities, providing greater value for many users.

Features:Contrast Security Protect is known for dynamic application self-protection, detailed vulnerability insights, and seamless integration with existing workflows. Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced threat prevention, flexible deployment options, and excels in feature richness in larger environments demanding high security.

Room for Improvement:Contrast Security Protect could improve its alerting system for faster responsiveness and enhance customization options to better fit user needs. It's suggested that Contrast works on simplifying its user interface. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users want more user-friendly reporting tools, faster update processes to keep up with emerging threats, and better integration with third-party apps.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Contrast Security Protect offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer support that simplifies the setup and operational phases. In contrast, Check Point CloudGuard WAF's deployment demands more effort due to its complexity, but its customer service is praised for effectively resolving complex issues.

Pricing and ROI:Contrast Security Protect is perceived as cost-effective, with reduced incident response times leading to higher ROI and lower initial setup expenses. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, despite higher setup costs, provides long-term ROI through comprehensive security features that justify the investment, appealing particularly to security-focused organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Contrast Security Protect Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Contrast Security Protect

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)

Contrast Security Protect

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Contrast Security Protect is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	0.3%
Contrast Security Protect	0.7%
Other	99.0%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

Akshay Waghmare

Manager at Deloitte

A stable DevSecOps product that gives fewer false positives

We use the product for DevSecOps. The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives. Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration. I have been using the product for a year. Contrast Security Protect is stable. The solution is scalable. My company has ten…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use and multiple functionalities."

"Whenever there was a new CVE, Check Point CloudGuard WAF used to block them."

"Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI."

"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."

"The automated policy creation and threat intelligence have helped my team by reducing manual configuration and saving time, and the threat intelligence updates ensure immediate protection against new threats, simplifying daily operations and improving response speed."

"It is a highly scalable solution with a quick turnaround time for deployment and running of the software across any IT system."

"The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"The solution has excellent real-time capabilities."

"The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives."

"Protect provides us with more in-depth visibility into ongoing attacks."

Cons

"The documentation of each of the tools that they offer needs to be better."

"It was costlier than other solutions."

"The user interface, SmartConsole, sometimes malfunctions and requires a restart."

"When I migrate the traffic from our mobile application to CloudGuard, we are not getting what we expected."

"The learning curve was a challenge due to initially incorrect configurations."

"The reporting can be improved."

"I would like to be able to integrate the theme of Artificial Intelligence to help review issues and to monitor and view the security issue while also suggesting and interpreting and additionally configuring solutions - basically, acting as an interpreter."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than that, it is fine."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"There's room for improvement in the initial setup."

"Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration."

"Protect's reporting GUI is very basic. To get all statuses from the APIs, we needed to write our own KPI dashboard to provide reports."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

I don't know about the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF, as I don't manage costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Contrast Security Protect?

The product gives a few false positives. We get 99 percent true positives.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Contrast Security Protect?

Contrast Security Protect needs to improve integration.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Contrast Security Protect?

We use the product for DevSecOps.

See all answers

Comparisons

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 19% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

OpenText Core Application Security vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 30% of the time

Acunetix vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 23% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 23% of the time

Mend.io vs Contrast Security Protect

Compared 23% of the time

More Contrast Security Protect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

October 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

September 2025

Download Contrast Security Protect product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

Contrast Protect

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Contrast Security is the world’s leading provider of security technology that enables software applications to protect themselves against cyberattacks, heralding the new era of self-protecting software. Contrast's patented deep security instrumentation is the breakthrough technology that enables highly accurate assessment and always-on protection of an entire application portfolio, without disruptive scanning or expensive security experts. Only Contrast has sensors that work actively inside applications to uncover vulnerabilities, prevent data breaches, and secure the entire enterprise from development, to operations, to production.

Contrast Security

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

Williams-Sonoma, Autodesk, HUAWEI, Chromeriver, RingCentral, Demandware.

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Contrast Security Protect

September 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Contrast Security Protect

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Contrast Security Protect and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Contrast Security Protect report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.