GitLab and Check Point CloudGuard Code Security both compete in the realm of software tools, with GitLab focusing on the DevOps lifecycle, particularly software development integration, while Check Point CloudGuard Code Security concentrates on cloud security environments. GitLab seems to have the upper hand in development integration and management, whereas CloudGuard shines in security-focused features for multiple cloud platforms.
Features: GitLab provides extensive features for DevOps processes including CI/CD pipelines, seamless cloud integration, and comprehensive code management. Its user-friendly interface and integrated security functionalities enhance development efficiency. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security specializes in advanced threat detection, vulnerability analysis, and deep code analysis, offering robust security across diverse cloud environments. It prioritizes threat prevention and security compliance for seamless protection across multi-cloud deployments.
Room for Improvement: GitLab could improve in areas such as documentation, expanding third-party tool integration, and refining its user interface for enhanced usability. Enhancements in CI/CD pipeline automation have also been suggested. Check Point CloudGuard may benefit from clearer documentation, stronger integration capabilities with external tools, and simplifying setup processes to minimize user complexity in deploying security measures.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab supports flexible deployment across on-premises and cloud environments, though users find its technical support adequate but not always prompt for intricate issues. Check Point CloudGuard excels in cloud deployment offerings, supported by professional services, although there is a noted reliance on specialized partners for comprehensive deployment and issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: GitLab tends to be costlier for smaller teams but delivers good ROI through its comprehensive feature set. It offers an open-source version that is cost-effective for smaller implementations. Check Point CloudGuard presents a value-focused pricing model accessible to various business sizes, though improvements in licensing modules are recommended. Both products report positive ROI due to their distinct contributions to either development workflow efficiency or security enhancement.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
I would rate the support for Check Point CloudGuard Code Security as good because we can quickly email support about any problems we encounter, and they reply instantly to provide help.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.
We raised a request with GitLab support, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong.
All the features we have on the firewall on the on-premises side, we also have under CloudGuard such as IPS, Anti-Bot, and all these blades are set up in our CloudGuard.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
The most valuable features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security include our approach to manage it via the management we have on-premises, and we also deploy the same extension management of CloudGuard to manage all the virtual systems on Azure.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| GitLab | 11.7% |
| Check Point CloudGuard Code Security | 1.3% |
| Other | 87.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 35 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 42 |
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security provides real-time protection and compliance enhancement across diverse infrastructures, streamlining security management with automated processes and accurate threat detection.
Designed to support multiple code languages and cloud environments, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security offers seamless integration with existing workflows. By implementing intuitive dashboards and role-based access control, it enhances operational efficiency while minimizing human error. The system secures identities, API keys, and configurations, aligning with legal frameworks to strengthen infrastructures against modern threats. However, improvements are needed in documentation, multilingual support, and easier integration with SIEM. Attention to geolocation, logging, and learning curves also requires enhancement.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security?Across the tech industry, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is applied to enhance cloud and application security, providing thorough protection against vulnerabilities and breaches. By integrating security across cloud environments and data centers, organizations achieve improved practices and adherence to compliance standards.
GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.
GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.
What are GitLab's most valuable features?In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.
We monitor all DevSecOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
