Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The implementation of this tool for security management and control is very simple.""Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment.""Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic.""Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning.""We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities.""Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development.""We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events.""The data center security system has provided real-time analytics on performance and data configuration processes."

More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pros →

"It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.""We chose Forcepoint as part of our cybersecurity strategy, and one of the key expectations was to prevent data leakage."

More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Pros →

Cons
"I am satisfied with the performance and results enhanced by this product since we deployed it.""There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is.""There needs to be better security around API integration.""This is a highly technical solution for users who do not have security experience. It requires specialized knowledge of configurations to use it correctly.""It is generally difficult to find documentation about the product, and there is relatively little to find.""They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing.""We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development.""I would like this solution to be extended to cellular devices or tablets."

More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Cons →

"The deployment is a little bit difficult. It requires two to three separate servers for databases and the application.""From an end user's perspective, it's not always clear what's happening with the DLP. It would be beneficial to have more use cases available, perhaps on a countrywide basis."

More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is extremely affordable and high value for cost."
  • More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license."
  • More Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than… more »
    Top Answer:It is extremely affordable and high value for cost.
    Top Answer:There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the… more »
    Top Answer:It primarily influences policy enforcement, cloud application access control, and endpoint network coverage.
    Top Answer:The licensing cost is roughly 90 US dollars per year, per license.
    Top Answer:Ideally, it should have some native analytical tools with good graphical options, but the current options lack customization. Improved analytical tools would provide a more granular technical view and… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    392
    Comparisons
    93
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    587
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    29
    Comparisons
    18
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    682
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Spectral
    Learn More
    Overview

    CloudGuard Code Security’s automated tools integrate with developers’ tools to detect code vulnerabilities and to identify secrets and misconfigurations in the code before deployment, preventing unauthorized use to nefarious ends. With CloudGuard Code Security, organizations can prevent exposing API keys, tokens and credentials, in addition to remediating security misconfigurations. With a super-fast platform, CloudGuard Code Security ensures security without compromising productivity.

    Simplifying data security through personalized automation

    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm36%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Transportation Company9%
    Engineering Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Security Firm11%
    Government10%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 11th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 11 reviews while Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is ranked 26th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4, while Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP writes "Stable product, key part of cybersecurity strategy but country-specific configuration issues requiring manual work ". Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Snyk, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP is most compared with . See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Forcepoint Risk Adaptive Protection for DLP report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.