We performed a comparison between Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade and MetaDefender Email Security Solutions based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Email Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Defender is a SaaS platform, so it offers more flexibility. Managing the permissions is easier. The solution's automated detection and response features are scalable."
"The technical support is good and quick to resolve issues."
"The deployment capability is a great feature."
"I like its investigation capabilities, as that is what is most important to me. It is fairly simple with a user-friendly interface."
"The basic features are okay and I'm satisfied with the Defender."
"Threat Explorer is one of the features that I very much like because it is a real-time report that allows you to identify, analyze, and trace security attacks."
"At the moment we are satisfied with this product. It's a stable, scalable, and resilient solution for us."
"The product is not resource-intensive."
"It does a better job of recognizing spammers."
"When sharing files with my colleagues, it provides a comprehensive report on the security status of the document."
"Anti-spam and malware phishing are valuable features of the solution."
"It has several very good features that form an excellent tool."
"Mail sanitisation features are second to none."
"Check Point offers us flexibility when it comes to customizing the configurations that we want to manage, thus allowing us to meet the specific needs of our company."
"The policies and port blocking are the most valuable features. We have a significant amount of spam emails passing through our network."
"It is easy to install, and the deployment is super easy as well."
More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Pros →
"The most valuable feature is called summary reconstruction which is used to deliver encrypted files to users."
"The most valuable feature of MetaDefender Email Security is the CDR. Customers purchase this solution specifically for data communication, as the other features can be obtained through other technologies that most customers already possess. Therefore, data communication serves as the foundation for the platform."
"The sanitization is very good."
"The custom alerts have to improve a lot."
"There is room for improvement with the UI."
"We need a separate license and we don't know how to get the license that is required."
"Microsoft wants its well-paying customers to finish testing some of its half-baked products, find bugs, and report bugs back to Microsoft's team, which is a little frustrating for those who have to manage it and roll it up to thousands of people across the organization."
"We are always looking for others tools to increase automation on tasks. There can be better integration with other solutions, such as PowerPoint and email."
"Microsoft Defender for Office 365 should be more proactive."
"They have moved features from one console to another. Things have been moved around in the interface and it takes me time to find where certain features are."
"The UI needs to be more user-friendly."
"There's definitely room for improvement when it comes to adapting to different languages in one environment."
"I would like this solution to be more integrated into other applications that Check Point has so that it could be managed quickly and safely from the Infinity Portal."
"It is expensive but worth it."
"There could be an extension of the trial period to 60 days."
"Installation time could be improved as it takes too long to install."
"In my book, more and more customized integrations could be made available so that different kinds of mail servers and cloud servers can be internally integrated for real-time system flow and security enablement."
"Mobile solutions should be added to Check Point because business email is also used by users on mobile devices."
"If you face any configuration problems, Check Point is the only solution."
More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Cons →
"Although the number of AV engines is good, it could be better."
"The DLP should be upgraded and has room for improvement."
"They offer a feature called SmartLink neutralization. I have tried it before. It seemed to work most of the time; however, I had a few users for whom it just wouldn't work. Whenever they click on a link, it stays on the MetaDefender page, saying that it's scanning it and never moves forward."
More Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
More MetaDefender Email Security Solutions Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is ranked 11th in Email Security with 32 reviews while MetaDefender Email Security Solutions is ranked 24th in Email Security with 3 reviews. Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is rated 8.2, while MetaDefender Email Security Solutions is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade writes "Effectively secures data centers against various threats, including spam emails and provides policy-based control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MetaDefender Email Security Solutions writes "Helpful support, and useful dashboards". Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is most compared with Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Abnormal Security, Cisco Secure Email, Fortinet FortiMail and Sophos Email, whereas MetaDefender Email Security Solutions is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection and Barracuda Email Security Gateway. See our Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs. MetaDefender Email Security Solutions report.
See our list of best Email Security vendors.
We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.