Carbonite Server vs Teradata comparison

OpenText and Teradata are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #56, while Teradata is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5. OpenText holds a 0.7% mindshare in BRS, compared to Teradata’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Teradata users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

1,252 Views
939 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Teradata

Read 76 Teradata reviews

10,676 Views
214 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

Teradata

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Teradata and Carbonite Server are competing products in the data management space. Teradata emerges as the dominant choice due to its comprehensive features and robust analytics capabilities.

Features: Teradata offers advanced analytics, scalability, and integration capabilities suitable for large-scale data warehousing. Its analytical power is unmatched. Carbonite Server excels in data protection with quick recovery features and a strong emphasis on security and data recovery.

Room for Improvement: Teradata could improve in deployment complexity, reducing the need for technical expertise. Users also seek more intuitive interfaces and cost-effective solutions. Carbonite Server's areas for improvement include expanding analytics capabilities, enhancing scalability for large data environments, and providing more customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server offers straightforward deployment and strong customer support, making setup and assistance highly accessible. Teradata's deployment requires technical know-how but is backed by dedicated customer service focusing on performance and technical issues resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Teradata has higher setup costs due to extensive features and customization but offers significant ROI for complex data needs. Carbonite Server's lower upfront costs provide quicker ROI, appealing to organizations seeking cost-efficiency and protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. Teradata Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Teradata

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

56th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (48th)

Teradata

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Data Integration (15th), Relational Databases Tools (8th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (9th), Marketing Management (6th), Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 0.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Dale Dirkes

President at DIAD Consulting, Inc.

A simple, efficient, reliable product

The efficiency and convenience are excellent. The pricing is very good. It shows you what has been updated via little green dots. The solution is very automatic. I don't have to worry about it. It was easy to set up. Technical support has been helpful in the past. The solution has been problem-free.

Read full review

RajeshKumar25

Principal Consultant & Director at Quensulting

Harnessing advanced parallelism for top performance while embracing cloud trends

Teradata is primarily used for data warehousing across all customers. My clients have built-in applications that use Teradata, and their use varies from customer to customer, depending on the industry and database size. The primary function is as an OLAP analytical ecosystem Scalability is…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easy verification of things is the most valuable feature."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"Technical support handled all our issues quickly and effectively."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"The solution is very stable."

More Carbonite Server pros

"The ability to handle machine data parallel processing is the most valuable feature of Teradata."

"We did performance testing. We had a set of real life MicroStrategy reports. Our conditions were: Not allowed to redesign data model, not allowed to rewrite the queries, all queries should be generated by MicroStrategy, no aggregates. Teradata appeared to be way faster than a similarly configured (in terms of hardware) Oracle server."

"Parallel processing features have helped to easily dump any size of data and retrieve data with great performance."

"I've never had any issues with scalability."

"Things have started moving faster in my company, such as data retrieval happens more quickly."

"Their extensive experience in data warehousing, the platform's performance, and their strong reputation in the market are the most valuable."

"Building a data warehouse with Teradata has definitely helped a lot of our downstream applications to more easily access information."

"IntelliFlex is easy to scale - one of its best features is that you can upscale it to the size you want."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"The stability has room for improvement."

"The only thing that I would like to see improved is related to marketing. Currently, it is very difficult to find the right paper and stuff for me. Their marketing department should provide better information because currently, it is very difficult to find information on the internet. It was bought over by OpenText, and you won't be able to find a lot of information about this solution on their site. They should also provide training facilities for commercial purposes. Some of my colleagues recently went for pilot training, and they were technical. If I want to get trained, the training has to be more commercial. Currently, there is no such training for users like me."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

"It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI."

"They should add more connectors to different platforms."

"Sometimes the large injestion takes days to load data, and some of our stored procedures take two to three days."

"Since I was working on the very basic, legacy systems, the memory thing was always a challenge. If Teradata is moving to the cloud, the space constraint or the memory issue that my company generally faces will eventually resolve, in time. What I'd like to see in the next release of Teradata is that it becomes full-fledged on the cloud, apart from better connectivity to various systems. For example, if I have to read or include a Python script, if I write some basic codes, I should be able to read even unstructured data. I know that it's not supported even in Snowflake, but at least semi-structured data support, if that can be a little more enhanced, that would be good."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"The solution needs improvement in its stability, support and pricing."

"There are some ways that the handling of unstructured data could be improved."

"Teradata's UI could be more user-friendly."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"Its price is reasonable."

"The solution is open source."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"We had a lot of parties involved when purchasing from the AWS Marketplace. They are very flexible and aggressive in trying to close the deal. They are good at what they have to offer and listening to the customer. It's a two-way street."

"The solution requires a license."

"Teradata is expensive, so it's typically marketed to big customers. However, there have been some changes, and Teradata is now offering more flexible pricing models and equipment leasing. They've added pay-as-you-go and cloud models, so it's changing, but Teradata is generally known as an expensive high-end product."

"The cost is substantial, totaling around $1.2 million, solely dedicated to upgrading the hardware."

"We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise."

"The cost is significantly high."

"In the past, it turned out that other solutions, in order to provide the full range of abilities that the Teradata platform provides plus the migration costs, would end up costing more than Teradata does."

"Teradata is not cheap, but you get what you pay for."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

See all answers

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

See all answers

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 28% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 23% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 10% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 9% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Carbonite Server

Compared 8% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 12% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

August 2025

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Teradata

July 2025

Download Teradata product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture

Overview

Carbonite Server securely replicates data to the local backup server while securing a second copy in the cloud. Granular restore and local failover options ensure rapid recovery and minimal data loss. With integrated hardware and cloud failover for critical systems, Carbonite Server provides reliable data protection.

OpenText

Teradata is a scalable data analytics platform designed to meet enterprise demands for large-scale data management and processing, focusing on performance, scalability, and security for complex query executions.

As a leading data warehousing solution, Teradata integrates advanced analytics enabling organizations to derive insights from massive datasets. It supports high-volume data workloads with its architecture optimized for analytical queries. Users benefit from its robust scalability, allowing seamless expansion as data grows. Teradata's SQL engine is compatible with a wide range of data types, ensuring flexibility in data analysis. With advanced security measures, it protects sensitive data across various environments, providing peace of mind to users handling critical information.

What are the most important features of Teradata?

Linear Scalability: Easily expands data processing capabilities to handle increasing data loads without performance degradation.
Advanced Analytics: Supports complex analytical operations integrating machine learning and AI for predictive insights.
SQL Compatibility: Offers a comprehensive SQL interface that supports complex queries across diverse data types.
Data Security: Implements rigorous security protocols to protect data integrity and confidentiality.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Decision-Making: Derive actionable insights quickly for strategic business decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource usage reduces operational costs associated with data processing.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined data operations save time, allowing teams to focus on analysis.
Enhanced Scalability: Seamless growth without significant additional investment as data volumes increase.

Teradata is widely used in industries like finance, telecommunications, and healthcare, where data-driven decisions are critical. Companies leverage its robust analytics capabilities to enhance customer experiences, streamline operations, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. In these sectors, quick access to data insights can significantly impact competitive advantage.

Teradata

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

Netflix

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. Teradata

July 2025

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. Teradata

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. Teradata report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.