Carbonite Server vs iDrive comparison

OpenText and IDrive Inc. are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. OpenText is ranked #44, while IDrive Inc. is ranked #25 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 1.3% mindshare in CB, compared to IDrive Inc.’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDrive Inc. users who would recommend it.

Carbonite Server

Read 7 Carbonite Server reviews

3,973 Views
2,384 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

iDrive

Read 2 iDrive reviews

1,654 Views
1,654 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Carbonite Server

iDrive

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Carbonite Server and iDrive are competing in the data backup solutions category. Carbonite Server seems to have the upper hand in pricing and deployment efficiency, while iDrive's extensive feature set provides significant value.

Features: Carbonite Server offers seamless integration with existing IT setups, strong data recovery options, and reliable deployment tools. iDrive emphasizes cross-platform compatibility, advanced data encryption, and a diverse array of security features designed to enhance accessibility and protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Carbonite Server is recognized for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, enabling rapid setup for businesses that need quick solutions. iDrive, though providing comprehensive service, involves a more complex deployment model that may require initial setup efforts.

Pricing and ROI: Carbonite Server offers competitive pricing with efficient cost management, making it attractive for businesses focused on budget control and predictable ROI. iDrive's pricing is higher, but its extensive features deliver substantial value, positioning it as a premium option despite its cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Carbonite Server vs. iDrive Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. iDrive

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Carbonite Server

Ranking in Cloud Backup

44th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (57th)

iDrive

Ranking in Cloud Backup

25th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Carbonite Server is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of iDrive is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
iDrive	0.8%
Carbonite Server	1.3%
Other	97.9%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Chris Puddy

Backup, storage and disaster recovery technical specialist at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

A reliable backup product which needs little management

For most technical users the setup and initial deployment are fairly straightforward and once deployed it 99% of the time looks after itself. Installation of the agents is similar to most other products in that it has an install wizard to guide you, the accompanying documentation is also very useful to assist wherever you are in the agent install and policy setup process. Normally our customers' IT team does the deployment of agents, however, this isn't a daunting task unless you are dealing with multiple servers to protect the product. On a server-by-server basis, the deployment doesn't take long. From the MSP side of things, the infrastructure sitting behind the scenes doesn't take too much to install, configure and maintain.

Read full review

reviewer2539458

President at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Offers lot of storage space, and you can set up several different types of backups

I’ve had some issues with iDrive. I don’t have an updated version of Windows, so that might have something to do with it. I’m running a 2018 version of Windows 10, and I haven’t had any issues with Acronis. But I have had issues with iDrive, though they do seem to fix issues, but more slowly. It would be nice if iDrive could do what Acronis does and be able to do local disk images. Instead, the only local backup they do is a file backup. I’ve had issues like the scheduler mysteriously erasing my settings. I have to babysit it and make sure it’s doing the backups regularly because sometimes when they do updates, it scrambles my backup settings. I found out later that it hasn’t been doing backups for a few days, which is annoying. The email updates were another issue I had. It was giving me email updates for successful backups, and I don’t need my inbox full of those messages. And now I told them, I need an email message when the thing’s not running. But it doesn’t work that way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable."

"The solution is a free engine to help work with the container."

"I find the BMR/image and the recovery pieces are valuable."

"This solution is very simple to use and I will recommend it to anybody."

"The efficiency and convenience are excellent."

"The Granular Restore of SQL feature has been a lifesaver more times than I can count. One of the main reasons for looking at Carbonite was their support for platforms like AIX and AS/400 Series."

"It seems reliable and easy to use."

"It does not slow down your computer or use a lot of resources as it works."

More Carbonite Server pros

"iDrive will keep up to 30 versions of a file."

"The encryption process is the most useful part of using iDrive for data security. I also use the background backup feature which helps me to clone and conduct computer backup. These features are very reliable, especially when restoring images from damaged servers. But I don't use the real-time backup feature; I always use the scheduled backup."

Cons

"The stability has room for improvement."

"I would like to see an improvement on the management user interface, as well as Kellion integrations."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet; its public cloud support can be improved."

"The Hyper-V backup has room for improvement."

"It could be a little bit easier or faster to be able to access data files without having to download anything."

"The support for object storage isn't quite there yet. Its public cloud support can be improved. I would love to see the public cloud support for object storage, and it would be great, but what I always hear from the folks at Carbonite is that in a lot of cases, it directly competes with their cloud offering. So, I don't know when or where that will go or if that will go anywhere, but we are hopeful to see something. The dashboard is a little outdated. If they gave it a facelift and put some better design around their dashboard, that would be tremendous. I generally care less about the visual aesthetics of an application as long as it does what it needed to do, which is true in the case of this solution. We also have the Microsoft 365 platform. Because they're two separate platforms, I have to log in to my Microsoft platform to manage it, and I have to log into my Carbonite server backup platform to manage it. Having these two coexist together in one management console is really what we're looking for, but we went for it knowing this. We also knew that there would be some integration coming down the road. So, we're again hoping to see some of that coming in 2021."

"In the next release I would like to see an improvement in the auto failover option."

"They do not yet have USB recovery but they are adding it in coming releases."

More Carbonite Server cons

"The disadvantage of using real-time backup in iDrive is that it significantly impacts server performance, causing considerable speed issues. The archiving process needs improvement along with the management of bandwidth and CPU. There should also be more options for creating conditions to manage the workload of the environment, making the system easier to balance."

"I’ve had issues like the scheduler mysteriously erasing my settings. I have to babysit it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is reasonable."

"The solution is open source."

"We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license."

"The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year."

"According to our evaluation done five to seven years ago, iDrive is cheap and it covers a lot of our needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

18%

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Non Tech Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iDrive?

The pricing’s really good for the amount of backup space you get. I get five terabytes. I think it’s, like, eighty bucks a year, something like that.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iDrive?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering iDrive?

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Carbonite Server

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

SugarSync vs Carbonite Server

Compared 4% of the time

Carbonite Safe Backup vs Carbonite Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Carbonite Server Competitors

pCloud vs iDrive

Compared 17% of the time

Synology C2 Backup vs iDrive

Compared 16% of the time

Multcloud vs iDrive

Compared 14% of the time

OpenDrive vs iDrive

Compared 11% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud vs iDrive

Compared 6% of the time

More iDrive Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

August 2026

Download Carbonite Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

August 2026

Download iDrive product report

Also Known As

Carbonite Recover Backup

No data available

Overview

Carbonite Server offers robust disaster recovery and data protection, with efficient features for restoring and managing complex server environments.

With capabilities like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL granular restore, Carbonite Server supports AIX and AS/400 Series, making it versatile for different platforms. Its efficient replication and failover processes are particularly beneficial for maintaining business continuity. Users appreciate the straightforward setup, responsive technical support, and automatic updates. There is room for improvement in areas such as instant recovery, more granular user permissions, and enhanced cloud integration. Managed service providers find it useful for offering reliable cloud and on-premises backup solutions.

What are the key features of Carbonite Server?

Bare Metal Recovery: Simplifies full system recovery with minimal user intervention.
SQL Granular Restore: Enhances precision in database recovery operations.
Platform Support: Compatible with AIX, AS/400, VMware, vSphere, and vSAN.
Efficient Replication: Facilitates swift disaster recovery and data transfer.
Automatic Updates: Ensures current software status with less manual effort.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Disaster Recovery: Quick recovery processes improve business resilience.
Easy Verification: Simplifies compliance and data integrity checks.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes system resource usage, enhancing performance.
Reliable Support: Access to responsive technical support mitigates downtime.
Data Protection: Comprehensive solutions for cloud backups and data security.

Industries leveraging Carbonite Server enjoy its ability to support cloud backups, off-site data protection, and complex server restoration, especially in virtualized environments. It is widely used by managed service providers to deliver backup services and ensure application consistency in data transfers.

OpenText

iDrive is a reliable and user-friendly cloud storage solution that securely stores and backs up important files and data. With efficient backup and restore capabilities, seamless syncing across devices, and robust security measures, iDrive is expertly designed for personal and business use. Users appreciate its ease of use and the ability to access files from multiple devices, making it a valuable tool for efficient data management.

IDrive Inc.

Sample Customers

INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County

1. BMW 2. Audi 3. Mercedes-Benz 4. Volkswagen 5. Ford 6. General Motors 7. Toyota 8. Honda 9. Nissan 10. Hyundai 11. Kia 12. Volvo 13. Jaguar Land Rover 14. Porsche 15. Subaru 16. Mazda 17. Mitsubishi 18. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 19. Tesla 20. Peugeot 21. Renault 22. Citroën 23. Skoda 24. Seat 25. Mini 26. Bentley 27. Rolls-Royce 28. Lamborghini 29. Aston Martin 30. Ferrari 31. Maserati 32. Alfa Romeo

Buyer's Guide

Carbonite Server vs. iDrive

August 2026

Free Report: Carbonite Server vs. iDrive

Find out what your peers are saying about Carbonite Server vs. iDrive and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Carbonite Server vs. iDrive report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.