Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Capillary Engage+ vs Oracle Fusion Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Capillary Engage+
Ranking in CRM Customer Engagement Centers
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Fusion Service
Ranking in CRM Customer Engagement Centers
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
CRM (12th), Marketing Management (7th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Capillary Engage+?
Share your opinion
Dhivakar I - PeerSpot reviewer
Have faced persistent configuration issues and performance delays that slow down large workflows
From a developer's perspective, it could be more open for programming language configurations. It is currently restricted to Groovy scripting. While UI and UX designs are open to JavaScript configurations, there are restrictions on certain functions that can be used. The solution could be enhanced to better serve customers when dealing with complex programs. The customer's websites face issues with loading properly, and response time gets longer when implementing larger workflows. This could be improved to achieve lower response times even with larger workflows involving multiple system integrations and complex architecture. The agent decay capabilities need improvement in future releases. Currently, there are some agent decay configurations available for developers to implement, but this area needs enhancement. Performance issues exist in the Sandbox area. The Sandbox is a trial area for configurations, but if work continues for a long time without publishing, it tends to get corrupted, requiring deletion and rework from the ground up. This has caused significant rework and effort multiple times. Technical support can be challenging to work with. When facing product-related issues or configuration problems, the support experience varies. Sometimes the technical support is knowledgeable and helpful, but often they redirect problems elsewhere and cause delays in resolution.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CRM Customer Engagement Centers solutions are best for your needs.
872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Oracle Service Cloud?
From a developer's perspective, it could be more open for programming language configurations. It is currently restricted to Groovy scripting. While UI and UX designs are open to JavaScript configu...
What is your primary use case for Oracle Service Cloud?
I have been working on implementing Oracle Fusion Service to mainly higher education industry clients and one banking client. Before that, I was working with financial services-based solutions for ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle Service Cloud, Oracle RightNow
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Pacifico Seguros Generales, Elsevier B.V., Madison Area Technical College, Bigtree Entertainment, Pvt. Ltd., HM Land Registry, Walmart Stores Inc., MakeMyTrip Ltd., Orbitz Worldwide LLC, Big Fish Games Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in CRM Customer Engagement Centers. Updated: October 2025.
872,019 professionals have used our research since 2012.