We performed a comparison between Camunda and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."
"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pros →
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"Documentation can be improved."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."
"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Cons →
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is ranked 20th in Business Process Design with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center writes "Highly integrated, user-friendly, and supports mobile devices". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
