Camunda vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Camunda and Interfacing Technologies are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Interfacing Technologies is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Camunda holds a 12.5% mindshare in BPD, compared to Interfacing Technologies’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 77 Camunda reviews

7,546 Views
5,128 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

130 Views
58 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Camunda

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and Camunda compete in the business process management space. Interfacing Technologies seems more favorable with pricing and customer support, whereas Camunda stands out with its advanced feature set and justifies its higher cost.

Features: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center offers comprehensive process modeling, risk management features, and extensive compliance tools, attracting organizations that focus on regulatory adherence. Camunda provides seamless integration abilities, flexibility across IT environments, and notable adaptability, positioning it as a versatile solution for tech-savvy users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Interfacing Technologies offers straightforward deployment with significant customer support, ensuring smooth onboarding. Camunda gives flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premises, necessitating more technical expertise during setup.

Pricing and ROI: Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center features competitive pricing and promising ROI, appealing to businesses seeking cost-efficiency. Camunda requires a higher initial investment, though its long-term integration values justify the cost over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Design

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Process Automation (1st)

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in Business Process Design

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Camunda is 12.5%, up from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."

"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."

"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."

"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."

More Camunda pros

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

Cons

"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation. More open documentation would be beneficial to understand the deployment process better and facilitate easier setup."

"The documentation could use improvement."

"Probably one area I look forward to has to do with AI and how Camunda sees the AI angle on workflow."

"They have a migration plugin that can be used to migrate from one BPM to another BPM. It is in the beta stage since last year. If they can make it available in the market, it would be great. We are going to have a couple of migration projects for migrating from IBM BPM to Camunda, and this plugin would be useful. I have already discussed this with them two weeks ago and asked them to look into this and add it as a feature. We are expecting this plugin to be available in the next version. This is the only requirement we have at present. They keep on coming up with different features, which is helping us a lot. Its latest release that came out last month was awesome."

"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."

"The product does not have a dictionary."

"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."

More Camunda cons

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"Camunda's pricing is good."

"I use the open-source free version."

"The price is competitive with products like Bonitasoft and RHPAM (Red Hat Process Automation Manager). We have two versions of Camunda. The first version was open source, without support, but then we got a supported version."

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"Compared to other software, Camunda Platform is quite cost-effective."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

April 2025

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

April 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

Camunda

The Enterprise Process Center, A BPM software, helps companies gain a 360 degree blueprint of the organization in support of complex improvement, compliance and transformation initiatives. The EPC goes beyond process mapping & analysis, it covers the full spectrum of lifecycle governance and collaboration, enterprise architecture (EA), strategy-to-execution and workflow automation needs. The EPC offers a single repository to manage all complex business entity relationships and interdependencies, including: processes, procedures, roles, org units, resources, risks, controls, policies, rules, documents, strategic objectives, key performance indicators, systems, meta data & services. The EPC facilitates the alignment and visualization of strategic and operational performance and is often leveraged for quality, improvement, risk & audit management initiatives such as ISO, Lean, Basel III, SOX, and ITIL, amongst others.

Interfacing Technologies

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., EFFORTS, Stuart Wright

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

April 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.