

Box and SharePoint compete in the content management space. Box seems to have an advantage due to its mobile-friendly collaboration features, while SharePoint integrates deeply with Microsoft tools, making it ideal for those environments.
Features: Box enhances productivity with seamless file sharing, real-time editing, and structured file organizing. It integrates well with third-party applications and is user-friendly across platforms, including mobile. SharePoint offers strong integration with Microsoft tools, ensuring efficient workflows and robust security, creating a seamless experience within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Room for Improvement: Box needs to refine its search functionality for better indexing and document retrieval. Its integrations, particularly with Microsoft products, could be expanded. SharePoint could improve its performance speed and usability, with a need for simplifying configuration complexity and enhancing integration with non-Microsoft tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Box offers cloud-based deployments that enhance accessibility and collaboration. Its customer service is well-regarded, though its technical support process could be more streamlined. SharePoint's hybrid deployment model allows tailored implementations but often requires substantial IT involvement for configuration and integration. Customer service reviews are mixed, depending on internal or external support resources.
Pricing and ROI: Box provides a range of pricing plans, offering flexibility though some find its per-user cost high. It is generally seen as providing positive ROI through enhanced efficiency and reduced storage risks. SharePoint is perceived as cost-effective, offering extensive capabilities at an affordable price for budget-conscious organizations, yielding significant ROI through improved collaboration and workflow automation despite setup and licensing overheads.
Now, we can work and share live documents; they can see the real-time changes being made, and we can even get on a meeting and work on the document at the same time.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, the collaboration, versioning control, and data accuracy improved, allowing us to finish the project in just one month or two instead of six.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, they can collaborate in a very fast way.
Typically once you do, they are able to provide assistance on whatever you need.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is in an end-of-support era, so there is very limited customer support available.
The customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very responsive and proactive.
They got good results and everything is working, so it turned out okay.
Box - Intelligent Content Management plans have unlimited data, which is great.
I am uncertain about its effectiveness at an enterprise level, where SharePoint might be preferred.
We did not have any problem scaling Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.
For large organizations, I would recommend Sharepoint Online or cloud-based solutions as better options.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth efficiently.
Box was very stable and did not have any latency issues.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is stable in my experience.
If Box had an AI feature to summarize and identify documents based on their contents, it would significantly enhance usability.
To open and see who is accessing the document now and see my movements across the document or the file we are sharing together.
Additional customization with the automation workflows that Box - Intelligent Content Management offers would be helpful.
I would like to see more of AI's analytics and observations come into Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, particularly regarding user interface, speed, or integration with other tools.
Sometimes it would have been quicker to search outside of Microsoft or Sharepoint and use Google, or even find a YouTube video that explained how to do something, which should not be necessary for a Microsoft product that we pay for.
We can definitely improve the search feature, which should crawl every page and every list to retrieve data.
I found the pricing reasonable because when I was working for an IBM partner, Box was free for us.
Box - Intelligent Content Management has fairly good pricing for licenses, especially if you do an annual plan.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has been transparent
It enhances the security of our documents, files, and content.
Box had a very easy-to-use search feature and a good user interface on its website, which was faster and better than SharePoint.
I find the synchronization feature most valuable in Box. When I use multiple devices, it syncs them together and gives excellent results.
The workflows that connect Outlook, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, and OneDrive among others allow me to manage multiple actions for all these tools.
The workflow feature specifically helped my team by not only improving efficiency but also impacting our costs, as it saved on printer, paper, and ink consumption while allowing managers to approve requests from anywhere at any time.
I am not sure how we would share some of these resources as easily with another solution, especially being able to control who can access what at different levels and who can edit which files, who can upload, and who can see different things.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Box | 3.6% |
| Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 | 0.4% |
| Other | 96.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Box offers seamless integration with third-party apps, strong collaboration tools, and secure content distribution to enhance productivity across devices.
Box is a powerful platform for file storage and collaboration, known for its security, ease of use, and advanced integration options. Supporting seamless synchronization and real-time editing, Box facilitates effective teamwork and secure sharing of content both internally and externally. Though it faces challenges such as folder-level security and collaboration speed, Box remains a preferred choice for enterprises seeking efficient document management and secure file transfers. Its robust feature set, including metadata management and customizable permissions, supports remote work and facilitates easy access to stored documents and workflows.
What are the key features of Box?
Why do users appreciate using Box?
In industries like finance, healthcare, and legal, Box is employed for secure document storage and sharing, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Teams leverage its features for secure project collaboration, e-signatures, and handling large files, making it invaluable in sectors requiring strict data management protocols.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 features robust security, seamless Microsoft integration, and workflow automation, enhancing collaboration, file sharing, and document management.
Organizations leverage Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 for online data storage and efficient business process automation. It offers improved communication and secure file sharing through real-time collaboration and mobile access. While the platform increases productivity with version history and access control, areas such as offline functionality and performance enhancement need focus. The outdated user experience and limited browser support are aspects requiring attention.
What are the key features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7?In specific industries, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 is utilized for secure document management and collaboration. Manufacturing companies use it for managing complex workflows and storing files securely. In healthcare, it supports data consistency and real-time collaboration to ensure quality patient care.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.