No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Boomi iPaaS vs Tray.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
Boomi iPaaS boosts integration speed and efficiency, reducing costs and resources, delivering rapid returns within months.
Sentiment score
5.3
Tray.io's automation cut tasks by 80%, saved 40 weekly hours, and increased renewals, despite engineer cost concerns.
We have automated complete order-to-cash processes for multiple customers, saving over 90 million dollars.
Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger
The return is faster since development efforts are minimized, allowing for quicker integration delivery.
CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
I have observed a 100% return on investment, with considerable time saved and clients very happy with the output they received.
Associate at Ltim
I have seen a return on investment as the company has been renewing the product for the entire 19 months we have been using it, which indicates that trust is high and they likely see value and advantage in using the system.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It has even eliminated a position on our team because that person was no longer needed once we started the automations.
Applications Analyst at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.0
Boomi iPaaS support is responsive with varied quality; improvements in bug management and tiered costs are pointed out.
Sentiment score
4.8
Tray.io's platform is user-friendly, but those needing support find it adequate, with newsletters and updates being particularly helpful.
Seamlessly meeting SLAs and providing excellent responses to challenges and issues related to interface and data connectivity.
GenAI Strategist at Wipro Limited
The tech support is very good, offering immediate responses and chat options.
Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger
We receive service that is more than adequate, even exceptional.
CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
I have never used the customer support for Tray.io because the software is very easy to use and we never needed to contact support.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi iPaaS is scalable and adaptable, though some face challenges with complexity, cost, and log management.
Sentiment score
7.0
Tray.io scales well for large operations but struggles with increased complexity, affecting data processing in extensive deployments.
The reason we wanted to use our own Kubernetes cluster was to do automatic scaling for utilized resources, allowing us to save.
CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
We have built approximately 1,100 interfaces for one customer, which is a significant achievement.
Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger
We were able to deploy it from a small company within Tata with 200 people to what is now a multinational company with 92,000 people globally.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated.
Operations Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Tray.io's scalability is very good.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Boomi iPaaS is generally stable with minor issues, praised for 99.99% availability but some prefer Jitterbit's interface.
Sentiment score
7.8
Tray.io is stable and reliable, with challenging setup but performs well, despite some memory limitations affecting workflow processing.
In my experience, Tray.io is stable, as we have never experienced issues with it failing or being unavailable.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The biggest issue we have with Tray.io is that it runs out of memory space and does not process all of our workflows.
Applications Analyst at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Tray.io is stable, considering the number of workflows we automate.
IT Engineer at a consumer goods company with 51-200 employees
 

Room For Improvement

Boomi iPaaS requires enhancements in UI, documentation, support, API management, and offers improvements in pricing, training, and deployment processes.
Tray.io should enhance user-friendliness, debugging, documentation, pricing, integrations, and data handling for non-technical users and mid-market needs.
The integration landscape has become complex, and having a data strategy with unified data models would make integration easier for any platform, including Boomi.
GenAI Strategist at Wipro Limited
A significant area for improvement is version control.
CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
The ETL aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at the moment.
Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger
When an automation fails, it usually provides the JSON format, and if Tray.io could include a summary of what the actual error entails, that would be quite beneficial.
IT Engineer at a consumer goods company with 51-200 employees
I believe Tray.io can be improved by offering integration with Tableau, which is still not available.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

Boomi iPaaS offers cost-effective integration solutions, but expenses may increase with additional usage and connectors despite competitive pricing.
While pricing is relative, compared to others, it is favorable.
CTO at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
The pricing for Boomi iPaaS is reasonable, costing around $6,000 per year.
Integration and Solution Architect/AI Engineer (Boomi and Workday) at Tech Bridger
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates it is a little bit high but still reasonable.
Associate at Ltim
No one has complained in the finance department, and it is very rare for Tata Motors to refrain from complaining about pricing.
Principal AI and Data Science Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Boomi iPaaS simplifies integrations with low-code tools, connectors, and automation, enhancing efficiency, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.
Tray.io offers robust automation with error handling, data integration, and seamless platform connectivity through a user-friendly low-code interface.
It automates the creation and population of a data warehouse, reducing the need to write SQL scripts and procedures.
Innovation & Data Management Enterprise Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
I can definitely say I see specific positive outcomes after moving to Boomi iPaaS, noting improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and faster project delivery.
Associate at Ltim
The most valuable features of Boomi are the integration capabilities, the Data Hub product, and the UDI integration.
GenAI Strategist at Wipro Limited
The connector SDK is also very nice; it has a large library of pre-built connectors that can connect a lot of proprietary internal tools directly into Tray.io, allowing the developer to build, test, and deploy custom connectors using Node.js and integrate the data directly into Tray.io.
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
The logging and debugging features in Tray.io have helped us considerably, especially when dealing with APIs that return errors sometimes.
Operations Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Tray.io is low-code automation, meaning you do not have to be an expert in JSON to understand the components and create automations.
IT Engineer at a consumer goods company with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Boomi iPaaS
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (17th), AI Observability (17th)
Tray.io
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
15th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (15th), Cloud Data Integration (17th), Low-Code Development Platforms (19th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Boomi iPaaS is 6.9%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 1.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Boomi iPaaS6.9%
Tray.io1.9%
Other91.2%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

SG
Associate at Ltim
Cloud integration has transformed projects and delivers faster, more secure business workflows
In my opinion, the best feature Boomi iPaaS offers is its user interface, which is easy to maintain, has a low cost, and offers low licensing costs, making it very easy to develop any integration. Regarding features, Boomi iPaaS performs best and is more stable. It also has easy support, allowing me to contact the Boomi support vendor team for assistance with atoms, molecules, runtimes, and clusters. Security-wise, it is also more secure, enabling the use of internal OAuth 2.0 tokens and basic authentication for high-level authentication, and I can integrate with third-party services to obtain authentication, with some banking projects in Boomi iPaaS using PayU, Razorpay, and various payment platform authentications. The positive impact of Boomi iPaaS on my organization has been significant, as after adopting it, I received many projects with the help of the Boomi vendor who brought me opportunities for Boomi iPaaS usage. Previously, I used TIBCO, MFT, and WebMethods, which were all very old systems. Boomi iPaaS is cloud-based and continues to update constantly, which has been very useful and led to more business. I can definitely say I see specific positive outcomes after moving to Boomi iPaaS, noting improvements in efficiency, cost savings, and faster project delivery. The connector-based licensing cost is very low compared to other integration tools, and for security purposes, it is helpful. I have observed significant good performance transitioning from old legacy systems to Boomi iPaaS.
Amrit Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Automated student enrollments have reduced manual work and now free our team for higher-value support
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows. Introducing a more intuitive visual interface similar to what we have in make.com right now would make the platform much more collaborative and easier to work with for any non-technical folks or newly onboarded engineers, allowing them to be briefed faster. Visual debugging is another area where troubleshooting complex nested loops can feel very abstract. Having clearer, more visual step-by-step data tracking during test runs would speed up the development and testing process. The pricing model is geared heavily towards enterprise budgets; offering more flexible mid-market pricing tiers would make it more accessible for a growing organization that wants a small start and scale up gradually. The core platform security is highly robust and easily meets our requirements for SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. However, when utilizing their AI features such as Merlin AI with sensitive student data, we maintain a very cautious approach. While Tray.io provides enterprise-grade governance guardrails and data masking capabilities, our internal compliance policies prevent us from passing any personally identifiable student information directly through AI-driven processors. We trust Tray.io's underlying infrastructure security, but we believe organizations must still enforce strict data filtering protocols on their end to ensure student privacy is maintained. During our evaluation, we tested the AI capabilities in a sandbox environment, primarily using it to generate workflow drafts and natural language prompts from web data schemas. Strength-wise, it is highly capable when it comes to translating simple text descriptions into functional workflow templates. It serves as a great accelerator, helping to map standard files quickly and reducing the initial setup time for basic integrations. For issues, in the case of highly custom APIs or deeply nested data structures, accuracy declines. We noticed occasional misinterpretation of complex schemas, meaning our developers still had to manually review and correct the outputs. It is a highly helpful productivity booster but still requires human oversight for enterprise-grade reliability.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Healthcare Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise16
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates it is a little bit high but still reasonable.
What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
In terms of improvements, there is not much to enhance, but I believe a more user-friendly UI, solid Agent Garden features, and more training initiatives to promote Boomi iPaaS would be beneficial....
What is your primary use case for Boomi AtomSphere Integration?
My main use case for Boomi iPaaS is integration, as I have been integrating Boomi iPaaS with many source and destination systems such as Salesforce. I use Boomi iPaaS as an integrator, connecting w...
What needs improvement with Tray.io?
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-ce...
What is your primary use case for Tray.io?
We used and evaluated Tray.io for approximately three to six months during a proof of concept evaluation phase. During this period, our engineering and operation teams utilized the platform to buil...
What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?
I give Tray.io an eight out of ten rating mostly because of how it is developer-centric and lacks a low-code platform and the pricing. The reduction in manual data tasks had a direct positive impac...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Boomi
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach
Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi iPaaS vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.