"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"We are mostly using transmission rules. It has a lot of functions and logic related to transmission. It is a user-friendly tool with in-built functions."
"As a data integration platform, it is easy to use. It is quite robust and useful for volumetric analysis when you have huge volumes of data. We have tested it for up to ten million rows, and it is robust enough to process ten million rows internally with its parallel processing. Its error logging mechanism is far simpler and easier to understand than other data integration tools. The newer version of InfoSphere has the data catalog and IDC lineage. They are helpful in the easy traceability of columns and tables."
"It is quite useful and powerful."
"The Hierarchical Data Stage is good."
"The most valuable feature is the data integration for data warehousing."
"Once you have Infosphere up and running properly, it is stable."
"Offers great flexibility."
"The performance optimization is quite good in DataStage. It provides parallelism and pipelining mechanisms"
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"The interface needs improvement."
"The pricing should be lower."
"In the future, I would like to see more integration with cloud technologies."
"The response time from support is slow and needs to be improved."
"It doesn't have any big data connections. It would be good to have them because most of the systems are moving towards big data. There should also be a user-friendly way to interact with the cloud. Its loading process is very slow. It takes a lot of time for around 5 or 6 million records, and we are not able to provide real-time data to the vendors due to this delay. Its performance needs to be improved. It is also like a legacy system. It is not updated much. In higher versions, they only do small changes. We would like to have new features and new technologies."
"It would be useful to provide support for Python, AR, and Java."
"Currently lacking virtualization ability."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 6th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews while IBM InfoSphere DataStage is ranked 8th in Data Integration Tools with 9 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "A good integration tool that is stable, but has a complex initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere DataStage writes "Robust, easy to use, has a simple error logging mechanism, and works very well for huge volumes of data". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SSIS, Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas IBM InfoSphere DataStage is most compared with SSIS, Talend Open Studio, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and Azure Data Factory.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
