We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and IBM InfoSphere DataStage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The platform is user-friendly."
"Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"It has been a stable product."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the product's versatility to inject data."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to transfer information via notes."
"We like the flexibility of modeling."
"The performance optimization is quite good in DataStage. It provides parallelism and pipelining mechanisms"
"It's a robust solution."
"The concept of integration is a valuable feature of the product."
"The best feature of IBM InfoSphere DataStage for me was that it was very much user-friendly. The solution didn't require that much raw coding because most of its features were drag and drop, plus it had a large number of functionalities."
"The ETL tools are probably the most valuable feature. It has an IBM tool, a friendly UI and it makes things more comfortable."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"Documentation could be improved."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Reduced cost would allow more customers to choose the product. It's quite expensive in relation to the cost of other similar solutions."
"The error messaging needs to be improved."
"The documentation and in-application help for this solution need to be improved, especially for new features."
"It would be great if they can include some basic version of data quality checking features."
"The initial setup can be complex."
"The troubleshooting guide is very bad."
"I want the tool to continue with the on-prem version, not the cloud one."
"In terms of intermediate storage, we have some challenges, especially with customers who store data in intermediate locations."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while IBM InfoSphere DataStage is ranked 7th in Data Integration with 37 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while IBM InfoSphere DataStage is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere DataStage writes "User-friendly with a lot of functions for transmission rules, but has slow performance and not suitable for a huge volume of data". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas IBM InfoSphere DataStage is most compared with IBM Cloud Pak for Data, SSIS, Azure Data Factory, Talend Open Studio and Informatica PowerCenter. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. IBM InfoSphere DataStage report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.