BMC Compuware Xpediter vs Gen comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo
152 views|103 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Broadcom Logo
279 views|98 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Compuware Xpediter and Gen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development.
To learn more, read our detailed Mainframe Application Development Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I."

More BMC Compuware Xpediter Pros →

"Full packets, enable you to develop software and systems using these packets, and implement software on the mainframe side and the client side. You can use the same packets, so it's very powerful.""You can easily manage the code, and you can easily find other changes, other group changes, other models, other components.""CA Gen has provided us web development capability."

More Gen Pros →

Cons
"Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs."

More BMC Compuware Xpediter Cons →

"I cannot use DB2 specifications, DB2 comments, easily.""The product needs to be well marketed, then adopted. I am not seeing many customers using the product."

More Gen Cons →

Ranking
Views
152
Comparisons
103
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
279
Comparisons
98
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Application Development
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development. Updated: May 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA Gen
Learn More
Overview

Xpediter is Compuware’s mainframe application interactive debugging tool. It also offers code coverage for mainframe application analysis.

Xpediter enables developers to get into an interactive test session with minimal effort and quickly move applications into production with greater confidence.

With Xpediter, developers can:

  • See and control source code execution line by line
  • Fully understand what each individual instruction is doing
  • See and control all data variables within a test session
  • Resolve production abends without impacting program logic or risking data corruption
  • Monitor and control execution with added flexibility
  • Use Code Coverage to view documented proof that code has been executed
  • Trap transactions initiated by a remote source or a non-terminal task
  • Gain full control of testing
  • Create conditions during test to ensure execution of all code in a program
  • Work alongside other developers who are debugging application code in the same or different logical IMS systems through Xpediter’s integration with COPE IMS virtualization technology

CA Gen provides a single, integrated development environment that can help your teams create and maintain large-scale business applications for multiple platforms. This streamlined environment can help reduce manual labor and speed migration time while ensuring the future relevance of existing environments and applications.
Sample Customers
Credit Union, IMT, Chunghwa Telecom, Pitney Bowes, Helvetia
Global bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm26%
Insurance Company11%
Manufacturing Company11%
Computer Software Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm16%
Manufacturing Company14%
Government11%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise76%
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Application Development
May 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development. Updated: May 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Compuware Xpediter is ranked 6th in Mainframe Application Development while Gen is ranked 4th in Mainframe Application Development. BMC Compuware Xpediter is rated 8.6, while Gen is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BMC Compuware Xpediter writes "From a development perspective, it allowed me to validate every line of my logic if necessary, most times in one pass". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Gen writes "Rapid development software tool. Mature solution to make changes and put them in production". BMC Compuware Xpediter is most compared with IBM Debug Tool, InterTest, BMC Compuware Topaz Workbench and IBM Fault Analyzer for zOS, whereas Gen is most compared with IBM Rational Developer for z Systems.

See our list of best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Application Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.