BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Checkmk comparison

BMC Helix and Checkmk are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC Helix is ranked #45, while Checkmk is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5. BMC Helix holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Checkmk’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Checkmk users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

494 Views
203 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

4,452 Views
3,072 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Checkmk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Checkmk compete in IT infrastructure management. BMC excels in feature robustness, while Checkmk is preferred for cost-effectiveness.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers robust cloud provisioning, lifecycle automation, and multi-cloud portal capabilities. It integrates with BMC's Capacity Optimization, Database Automation, and Bladelogic Server Automation to manage provisioning post-actions and compliance. Checkmk provides auto-discovery, custom monitoring checks, and resource monitoring. Its integration with services like Slack for immediate notifications enhances its user utility.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could enhance ease of deployment, improve customer support accessibility, and streamline training requirements. Checkmk can improve its graphical interface, add more advanced monitoring features for complex systems, and expand integration options with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management has a more complex deployment that requires extensive support. Checkmk, in contrast, features a straightforward installation and responsive support, making it more accessible for quick setups.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management involves higher setup costs, justified by its comprehensive features, making it viable for large organizations. Checkmk is cost-effective with essential monitoring capabilities, offering an appealing ROI for those with budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Checkmk Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Checkmk

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (38th)

Checkmk

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (14th), Server Monitoring (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Checkmk is 5.4%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Checkmk	5.4%
BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management	0.3%
Other	94.3%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

More Checkmk pros

Cons

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

More Checkmk cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is affordable."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 31% of the time

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 22% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 22% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 41% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 9% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

October 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC Helix

Checkmk provides a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to streamline IT infrastructure management with features like auto-discovery, custom checks, and effective alerting.

Checkmk serves as a powerful tool for organizations managing large networks of servers, databases, and network appliances across multiple locations. It simplifies monitoring tasks with features like auto-discovery, custom scripting, and Slack integration. Users benefit from its resource monitoring capabilities and scalability, although there are areas for improvement, such as alert acknowledgment and greater usability. It supports both Linux and Windows environments, enabling effective oversight of IT infrastructure. The growing body of documentation enhances its adaptability in complex settings.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-Discovery: Identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules automatically.
Custom Monitoring Checks: Tailor checks for databases and specific applications.
Slack Integration: Receive downtime alerts directly in Slack channels.
Automation for Scripts: Streamline repetitive tasks with scripts.
Effective Alerting System: Offers timely notifications on network activities.

What benefits can users expect?

Resource Efficiency: Saves time on configuration with automated features.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network and system requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Suitable option for budget-conscious users.
User-Friendly Setup: Easy to configure, reducing the learning curve.

Industries deploying Checkmk frequently utilize it for monitoring IT infrastructure, including servers and network appliances, to manage proactive issue identification and compliance. Companies employ it in the proof of concept phase or for ongoing monitoring, covering hosts, services, and custom application metrics.

Checkmk

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Checkmk

September 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Checkmk

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Checkmk and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Checkmk report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.