Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlackBerry Workspaces vs Leapfile Managed File Transfer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Workspaces
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
24th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Leapfile Managed File Transfer
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
30th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Workspaces is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Leapfile Managed File Transfer is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Content Collaboration Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

RE
Facilitates monitoring and control of our repositories, but would benefit from the inclusion of workflows
Our primary use case for this solution is secure file sharing All of our different repositories of documents, like SharePoint and Box, were linked to Workspaces to ensure that sharing content was monitored, controlled, and secure. The most valuable features are the ability to revoke rights after…
Use Leapfile Managed File Transfer?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Also Known As

WatchDox
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

QIC, Evides
Xperient, Rea & Associates, Integrated Design Inc
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: July 2025.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.