Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform comparison

Bitdefender and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Bitdefender is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.3, while Trellix is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.9. Bitdefender holds a 0.3% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Bitdefender users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Read 158 Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reviews
  • 9,620 Views
  • 6,445 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 9, 2025

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and Bitdefender GravityZone XDR compete in the enterprise security software category. Bitdefender appears to have the upper hand with its strong malware detection and user-friendly AI-driven features.

Features: Trellix offers data loss prevention, encryption, and centralized management via ePolicy Orchestrator. Its threat prevention is complemented by robust integration capabilities. Bitdefender provides effective malware detection, strong ransomware protection, and an easy installation process with AI-enhanced threat analytics.

Room for Improvement: Trellix users seek reduced resource consumption, improved configuration simplicity, and better integration with Mac and Linux systems. Bitdefender could improve its DLP capabilities and unify its management features for a better console experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix allows extensive on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments suited for complex environments needing custom features. Bitdefender excels in cloud deployment with seamless customer service, known for responsiveness and convenience.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix is perceived as more expensive due to bundled feature complexity, yet claims cost-effectiveness for complex needs. Bitdefender offers competitive pricing, particularly beneficial for large user bases, facilitating cost-effective scaling and strong ROI through efficient protection.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone Ext...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
38th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
29th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Network Detection and Response (NDR) (18th)
Trellix Endpoint Security P...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
9th
Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
158
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is 4.2%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
 

Featured Reviews

Robin Cook - PeerSpot reviewer
Exceptional threat detection and effortless installation impress users
The solution has best-in-breed technology and scores very highly on efficacy rates. The threat detection rates are exceptionally good, better than most of the competition. The solution is highly respected in the industry. The product is very scalable, and the installation is reported to be extremely easy, even for those without great technical capabilities.
Read full review
Abdullah Al Hadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization capabilities allow clients to autonomously deploy policies
There are a few areas where Trellix Endpoint Security can improve. Firstly, the high CPU utilization when agents are installed can negatively impact client systems. Another issue is with end-users outside the network, where the agent handler sometimes fails to deploy the product properly. Improvements are needed in forensic analytics to detect specific vulnerabilities. It would also help if detection specifics were identified more quickly and the problem-solving process accelerated, especially to meet larger clients' expectations.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The quarantine computer functionality is very good for me."
"The product is easy to use."
"The threat detection rates are exceptionally good, better than most of the competition."
"The best features in the product, as a reseller, are the integrated SOC; integration with a SOC is one of the advantages."
"I find Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus to be a pretty good solution for the mid-level market, specifically for organizations with up to two hundred fifty users. I like that it is an averagely priced solution. It also has a straightforward installation that can be completed within three to five minutes. Its technical support is also good enough."
"It never fails. Bitdefender always catches all of the viruses that have been detected on customer sites."
"The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools."
"The solution has best-in-breed technology and scores very highly on efficacy rates."
More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) pros
"The exploit guard and malware protection features are very useful. The logon tracker feature is also very useful. They have also given new modules such as logout backup, process backup. We ordered these modules from the FireEye market place, and we have installed these modules. We are currently exploring these features."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"Trellix Endpoint Security is a proven, robust, and cost-effective solution that protects the organization from different types of ransomware and attacks."
"Trellix Endpoint Security offers robust access protection, addressing major concerns in prevention. It provides both application control and user access control within its access protection features."
"The EPO, the ePolicy Orchestrator, is the best endpoint protection central management system."
"The performance is good."
"We can manage everything from the central console and it is very easy."
"The solution is stable."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pros
 

Cons

"Adding a feature like Data Loss Prevention would be beneficial."
"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform."
"The solution seems to be pretty amateur for an EDR solution, and it should be more in sync in terms of features, with solutions such as FireEye and SentinelOne."
"The solution must improve its management features."
"Some customers would like additional features that aren't available through the current GravityZone platform. Some feedback has been about the deletion of other software not going smoothly during the installation of Bitdefender, particularly the removal of previous software like Sophos."
"I would like automatic issue fixing for users without needing to physically open the PC. I'd prefer updates and fixes from the cloud to avoid headaches and save time."
"Detection and response is a disadvantage that could be improved."
"The mobile version needs improvement."
"It can be quite complicated to learn McAfee Endpoint Security and to feel comfortable with the environment."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly. There are multiple solutions and there is no clear line differentiating all of them. There is a centralized console where we manage everything but most of the administrators feel a little confused when it comes to managing multiple products from a single place."
"What needs improvement in Trellix Endpoint Security is the reduction of resource consumption by the scanning feature. There should be daily signature updates for protection."
"Recently, Trellix has introduced a CDR, which involves more manual response than automatic. I believe they should enhance the system by adding features like automated response and the ability to create custom playbooks. This is crucial for an EDR solution, and currently, Trellix lacks this feature while other products offer it."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"Patch management is unavailable"
"The solution lacks device control."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus is pretty average, meaning it's not cheaper, but it's pretty good. It has average pricing."
"It's a very good price for MSP. It's cheaper than Symantec."
"We have purchased licenses for the use of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus. The price of the solution is reasonable but could be better."
"I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing."
"The price of the solution is fair, we have a complete security package."
"The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"We had a discount when purchasing the solution because of the size of our company and we are happy with the price."
"Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."
"The pricing is mid-ranged and quite reasonable compared to other similar products."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
6%
Government
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
The best thing about Bitdefender is that it has got top-notch features and it is not tied to specific countries like some other antivirus tools.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
It's a good price for the solution and for the customer.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Plus?
Detection and response is a disadvantage that could be improved. It could be improved by the technical teams of Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR). I think the detection ...
See all answers
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...
See all answers
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Endpoint Security?
It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 26% of the time
Darktrace vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Darktrace vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 22% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 20% of the time
Vectra AI vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Vectra AI vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 16% of the time
Wazuh vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Logo
Wazuh vs Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Compared 16% of the time
More Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 15% of the time
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 8% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 7% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 6% of the time
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Logo
Tanium vs Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Compared 4% of the time
More Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
August 2025
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reportDownload Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
July 2025
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform reportDownload Trellix Endpoint Security Platform product report
 

Also Known As

GravityZone Ultra Plus
McAfee Endpoint Security, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
 

Overview

Bitdefender GravityZone XDR enhances network security via advanced threat detection, offers centralized incident response, and comprehensive endpoint protection. Users value the user-friendly interface, robust analytics, and streamlined management, significantly boosting organizational efficiency and productivity.
Bitdefender

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers essential features like centralized management, threat prevention, and encryption, facilitating seamless scaling and integration with other systems while prioritizing user security.

This comprehensive platform focuses on endpoint protection, antivirus capabilities, and malware defense. It enhances cybersecurity with data loss prevention, advanced threat detection, and AI-driven features for reliable protection without impacting performance. Central management and advanced reporting streamline integration and ease of use. Flexible policy deployment through the management console and its robust security measures, such as DLP and device control, further increase protection. Challenges include high CPU and memory usage affecting performance, a complex interface, and lengthy deployment. Third-party integration and Windows Hello support need improvement. Additional concerns involve improved threat detection and faster technical support responses.

What are the key features of Trellix Endpoint Security Platform?
  • Centralized Management: Allows seamless integration and scaling with consistent control across environments.
  • Threat Prevention: Provides comprehensive antivirus and malware protection to secure systems.
  • Encryption: Ensures data security with robust encryption techniques.
  • Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights and analysis for better decision-making.
  • AI-Driven Detection: Offers reliable threat detection without impacting system performance.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Comprehensive Protection: Offers extensive security measures for protecting digital environments.
  • Ease of Integration: Simplifies the process of incorporating into current systems and processes.
  • Flexible Policy Deployment: Supports adaptable policy management to meet diverse requirements.
  • Scalability: Enables growth while maintaining efficiency and security.
  • Robust Security Features: Provides advanced security measures like DLP and device control.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform is widely implemented in industries such as banking and government for securing mobile and desktop devices. Its capabilities cover network security, device control, and remote access protection, catering to diverse environments by offering robust cybersecurity management against advanced threats.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe
inHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Buyer's Guide
Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
July 2025
Free Report: Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Bitdefender GravityZone Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform report.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.