Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bicore FLIGHTMAP vs LiquidPlanner comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bicore FLIGHTMAP
Ranking in Project Management Software
85th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (24th)
LiquidPlanner
Ranking in Project Management Software
34th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Bicore FLIGHTMAP is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiquidPlanner is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Project Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user92886 - PeerSpot reviewer
Building project portfolios in this product helps our team decide on a suitable set of KPIs. It should have more keyboard shortcuts, especially for advanced users.
Building the project portfolio in FLIGHTMAP helps our team decide on a suitable set of KPIs for our overall projects. KPIs are set for different metrics like time, resources, staffing, costs, risks & benefits. Once we have a portfolio composed, then we visually optimize the portfolio to find the right project mix for our requirements. The visual insight analysis is intuitive, it always helps to explore a data set with the various chart types; most notably, we use the bubble chart, project funnel chart, and portfolio roadmap. For financial metrics, we use the pie chart and bar chart. Our most common PPM actions are set up in the workflow module that runs automated processes based on our pre-set criteria. The visual diagrams and data from FLIGHTMAP can be automatically exported to reports (presentations, documents, and spreadsheets).
PG
Good for reporting, but a little rigorous in its methodology and not conducive to real project management
It is a little rigorous in its methodology and is cumbersome. For example, I have a hard stop date and I would like a project to end by a specific date, but this is not how this solution works. It sorts of spits out the project date based on your resource availability, dependencies, and so on. This sort of project planning works in theory, but that's not always the case. It also relies heavily on resources entering their time into the system, that is, how much time they worked on each of the tasks so that it can sort of consistently update the project. I know that in a lot of organizations, including ours, it is almost impossible to get them to track the time. In terms of additional features, they can include more integration with Microsoft because integration is going to be a key functionality.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

FLIGHTMAP
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

FLIGHTMAP is used by leading industry clients such as DAF Trucks, TomTom, and Canon-Océ, as well as by public organizations including the European Commission and the EIT ICT Labs.
Amazon, Redapt, Toshiba, LinkedIn, Nintendo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cummins
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Asana, monday.com and others in Project Management Software. Updated: July 2025.
861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.