BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs Veza comparison

BeyondTrust and Veza are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. BeyondTrust is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.0, while Veza is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5. BeyondTrust holds a 3.1% mindshare in PAM, compared to Veza’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of BeyondTrust users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Veza users who would recommend it.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Read 32 BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management reviews

5,929 Views
2,727 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Veza

Read 2 Veza reviews

4,763 Views
905 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Veza

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

BeyondTrust and Veza are both significant players in the security and identity management field. Veza appears to have a slight advantage due to its broader identity governance capabilities.

Features: BeyondTrust provides granular control in privilege management, minimizing security risks with elevated permissions. It also specializes in delegation management and offers robust privilege controls. Veza focuses on a comprehensive identity governance framework, enabling automated access reviews and enhanced compliance reporting. Furthermore, it supports extensive identity management capabilities for broader governance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BeyondTrust's deployment is streamlined and fits seamlessly into existing infrastructures. It also offers personalized customer support. Veza's cloud-first approach allows for faster integration though it requires a steeper initial learning curve. Customer service is efficient for both companies, with BeyondTrust having a slight edge in personalized support.

Pricing and ROI: BeyondTrust requires a higher upfront investment, yet its focus on privilege management provides valuable returns in terms of risk mitigation. Veza offers a more attractive pricing model with significant ROI through its efficient identity and access management solutions. Despite the higher initial costs, BeyondTrust's specialized features can lead to substantial risk reduction savings.

To learn more, read our detailed BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Veza Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Veza

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privil...

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (22nd)

Veza

Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (24th), Identity Management (IM) (21st), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (9th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (8th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is 3.1%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veza is 1.6%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management	3.1%
Veza	1.6%
Other	95.3%

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Featured Reviews

NasirAkbar

Presales Engineer at SAUDI PARAMOUNT COMPUTER SYSTEMS

Improved security measures with some support response delays

For BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, the best features are the security measures we have, such as not sharing any credentials with employees in the bank sector. For security purposes in BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, when employees are working in the system, we can make a recording of the video, showing the modifications and configurations they made, allowing us to see everything. The recording option is available. BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management positively impacts the organization by providing more security and benefits, such as ensuring that if modifications are made, we can see where mistakes occurred in the recording video. The recording video in BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management allows us to see modifications and mistakes, which is an advantage.

Read full review

HarshalJethwa

Cloud Operations Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Centralized access control has strengthened least privilege and streamlined audit compliance

The best features Veza offers in my experience are access visibility to see who can access what and which parts, relationship mapping of a user to roles, policies and resources, and risk detection such as over-permission and unused permission privileges. I can perform audit compliance using those features and the platform supports multiple platforms. Out of those features, I find risk detection to be the most valuable in my day-to-day work because I can check who has over-permission or unused permissions and understand relationship mapping and access visibility. Veza has positively impacted my organization by improving access for our users, allowing us to check the user and perform auditing for our system or organization. We are now able to implement least privilege practices, which has made our organization and system more secure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AI adds value by automating the onboarding of assets and using smart rules to assign privileges."

"It has some features that other products don't have yet, differentiation that sets it apart in the marketplace... Those features are a centralized dashboard and the ability to issue and revoke entitlements within minutes. That makes a difference."

"PowerBroker allows elevation of required actions or application and eliminates the need of user having full administrative access."

"I find the solution’s features like section management, password management, and analytics valuable."

"Technical support is good."

"I find the comprehensive Privilege Access Management features valuable, including automation, and the ability to integrate with applications and the Windows operating system."

"The privileged access management into sensitive systems is very valuable. That includes control from the endpoint all the way through to the managing of passwords and credentials that are used by the person to access the sensitive information. It's very useful, because nobody ever really maintains passwords for those endpoint systems. It's maintained in the Dropbox password file."

"It reduces major vulnerabilities by removing local administrator privileges."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management pros

"It's the only current GRC vendor with licensing rights for HITRUST 11.3 framework, and I've avoided expensive HITRUST licensing costs through a custom control framework."

"Veza has positively impacted my organization by improving access for our users, allowing us to check the user and perform auditing for our system or organization, and we are now able to implement least privilege practices, which has made our organization and system more secure."

Cons

"The deployment process should be clarified or made simpler."

"There are some features in CyberArk that are better, cheaper, or easier to implement."

"What's bothering me, which is true of all of them, is that sometimes, the error codes that come up don't necessarily get reflected in the searches within their support sites or they're out of date. I would rather search by an error code than type in the text and search for it by text because the error code means that it is programmatic, and it is known. It might not be desired, but it at least is not unexpected. If you don't have an error code, you just get an anomalous error, and if it is lengthy, it can be difficult to search and find the specific instance you're looking for. This is something I would like all of them to improve. BeyondTrust, CyberArk, Centrify, and Thycotic could do some improvements in staying up to date and actually allowing you to search based on the product version. They are assuming that everybody is on their way to release. They put out a new release, but it is not reflected on the support site, which makes no sense to me, especially when they revamp all the error codes. They all have been guilty of this in some way."

"Technical support for BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management should be an enterprise edition; whoever is working in the bank sector for security purposes needs to be 100% secure on the servers."

"How the accounts are presented in the solution's UI can be improved."

"All products have room to improve. I would like to see support for many more systems, such as AS400."

"They need to come up with better integrative options which should be customer-centric."

"That said, having said that, it has zero intelligence in checking whether the script is legitimate or bad."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management cons

"Veza can be improved as it is currently not suitable for small projects due to its high cost, complex setup, and requirement for more integration with multiple systems."

"The support experience could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It was very expensive."

"Its pricing and licensing are okay. We were in the perpetual model when it was on-prem, and now, with the SaaS service, we have a subscription model. As a customer, I would always like to see a lower price, but it seems to be priced at the right model currently, and we are trying to get the maximum benefits out of it."

"Price-wise, it is very competitive. In our area, government entities and banks don't go for the monthly payment. It is a headache even for us in terms of finance and procurement to go for monthly payments. Quarterly might be more logical and reasonable, but the minimum that we go for is one year, and sometimes, we even try to compile and give one offering for three years."

"The product’s licensing is different for Windows, Linux, and Mac. The tool’s licensing is yearly."

"What BeyondTrust was providing was user-based licensing which was a great benefit from the client point of view. Recently, I don't know why, the licensing model has been changed, and that is the reason that they have lost a bit of their edge when it comes to the PAM, against our competition. The asset-based licensing, from the user's point of view, is not beneficial. The licensing should be based on the users. The greater the number of users, the greater will be the load and the greater the scalability problems. I presume that is why the licensing model has changed."

"PowerBroker for a Mac client is three times the price of the Windows version."

"The solution's pricing is high."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	15

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

BeyondTrust's pricing is premium but negotiable for Bangladesh. Expect 20-30% extra costs from currency/import factors. Start with modular licensing (EPM first), demand emerging market discounts, a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

In future updates of BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, I would prefer to see features for Password Safe and VPN access, as we have applications for that. Technical support for BeyondTrust ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veza?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is much higher and the setup is very complex.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veza?

Veza can be improved as it is currently not suitable for small projects due to its high cost, complex setup, and requirement for more integration with multiple systems. Additionally, there are no e...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Veza?

My main use case for Veza is to use it for authentication and to determine who can access what and what can be accessed by the system or organization users. We set permissions for cloud platforms a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 9% of the time

Idira Endpoint Privilege Manager vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 7% of the time

WALLIX Bastion vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Identity Governance and Administration vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 5% of the time

Omada Identity vs BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

Compared 5% of the time

More BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Competitors

Lumos vs Veza

Compared 12% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Veza

Compared 9% of the time

Idira IGA vs Veza

Compared 6% of the time

Saviynt Identity Cloud vs Veza

Compared 6% of the time

Formalize vs Veza

Compared 5% of the time

More Veza Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management

August 2026

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management report

Download BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM)

July 2026

Download Veza product report

Also Known As

BeyondTrust PowerBroker, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Windows, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Mac, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Linux, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management for Unix, Avecto Defendpoint

No data available

Overview

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management offers enhanced security through asset discovery and privilege elevation without administrative rights, supporting seamless operations in complex environments.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management combines advanced threat detection with powerful tools like application control and session management. It is designed to secure IT infrastructures by removing local admin privileges and facilitating remote application publishing. With integration capabilities and robust compliance support, it is suitable for sectors needing stringent security measures. However, improvements in update frequency, Mac integration, and pricing, along with enhanced reporting and console access, are needed to broaden market reach. Organizations value its scalability and flexibility, despite needing better support and development maturity.

What Features Define BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

Asset Discovery: Identifies and catalogs IT assets for comprehensive visibility.
Privilege Management: Manages user privileges to minimize risks.
Session Management: Monitors and controls sessions for secure access.
Password Management: Secures credentials to prevent unauthorized access.
Application Control: Enables whitelisting and blacklisting for security.
Analytics: Offers insights into security trends and threats.

What Benefits Should Organizations Expect from Using BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management?

Enhanced Security: Reduces vulnerabilities by managing permissions effectively.
Scalable Deployment: Adapts to growing organizational requirements.
Compliance Support: Assists in meeting regulatory standards.
Improved Integration: Facilitates connections with other platforms like Active Directory.

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management is widely adopted in the finance and healthcare industries for privileged access management and compliance. It is instrumental in secure server access and remote management, aligning with zero-trust approaches and integrating smoothly with enterprise platforms.

BeyondTrust

Veza Core Authorization Platform enhances data access visibility, centralizes control, and simplifies user permissions management. Its robust security through zero-trust principles, seamless integration, and automated compliance reporting boost organizational efficiency, productivity, and security, while streamlining workflows and minimizing vulnerabilities.

Veza

Sample Customers

Aera Energy LLC, Care New England, James Madison University

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Veza

August 2026

Free Report: BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Veza

Find out what your peers are saying about BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Veza and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs. Veza report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.