Barracuda CloudGen Firewall vs Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline comparison

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall and Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline compete in the network security and management category. Barracuda CloudGen Firewall often has the upper hand due to its comprehensive security features and scalability.

Features: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is equipped with application control, intrusion prevention systems, and TINA VPN technology. It scales efficiently with real-time and historical data analysis. Integration capabilities with IT architectures like LDAP and Active Directory are significant advantages. Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline provides superior network visibility and packet filtering capabilities, aiding in precise traffic analysis.

Room for Improvement: Barracuda's interface can be confusing, and detailed traffic analysis is limited. There are noted issues with IPv6 exposure and usability that could be enhanced. Gigamon could benefit from internal network analytics and integrated traffic visualization to reduce dependency on third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall is versatile in its deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, with variable technical support experiences. Gigamon is primarily used in hybrid and on-premises setups. Both products receive positive customer service feedback, though support consistency needs improvement.

Pricing and ROI: Barracuda CloudGen Firewall's competitive pricing and cost-effective management are highlighted, providing significant ROI through efficient resource utilization. Gigamon's pricing is considered high but justified by its performance and network management capabilities, though perceived value varies among users.