Bamboo vs GNU Make comparison

Atlassian and GNU are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Atlassian is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while GNU is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Atlassian holds a 4.2% mindshare in BA, compared to GNU’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 78% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of GNU users who would recommend it.

Bamboo

Read 23 Bamboo reviews

3,399 Views
3,229 Comparison Views

78% willing to recommend

GNU Make

Read 6 GNU Make reviews

1,236 Views
1,162 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Bamboo

GNU Make

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GNU Make and Bamboo are products competing in build automation and continuous integration. GNU Make holds an edge in simplicity and cost-effectiveness, while Bamboo stands out for its comprehensive features making it suitable for larger projects.

Features: GNU Make is efficient in automating build processes with its rule-based build paradigm and dependency management, making it ideal for smaller projects. It supports third-party integrations and nested makefile usage. Bamboo, meanwhile, offers continuous integration, delivery, and deployment capabilities with support for multiple platforms. It integrates well with the Atlassian ecosystem, providing numerous tools for modern software development.

Room for Improvement: GNU Make could benefit from an enhanced graphical user interface and broader support for non-standard makefile names. Additional features for improved integration with third-party tools would enhance its appeal. Bamboo might improve by reducing its complexity to simplify ease of use, enhancing integration with non-Atlassian products, and offering more competitive pricing options to broaden its market base.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GNU Make offers straightforward deployment with its open-source model but relies on user expertise and self-service support. Bamboo provides a comprehensive deployment experience with dedicated professional support, valuable for environments needing integrated services and fast troubleshooting.

Pricing and ROI: GNU Make provides a low-cost entry as a free open-source tool, ideal for small to medium projects. Bamboo's higher initial setup and subscription costs are justified by its extensive features and better long-term ROI for enterprise use, enhancing productivity for larger teams.

To learn more, read our detailed Bamboo vs. GNU Make Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. GNU Make

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,679 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo

Ranking in Build Automation

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GNU Make

Ranking in Build Automation

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 4.2%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GNU Make is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Bamboo	4.2%
GNU Make	1.7%
Other	94.1%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Christo Louw

Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting

Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.

Read full review

Josh Call

Software Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Enhances productivity with efficient dependency handling and a straightforward setup

GNU Make is used as a build system tool. Most people don't use GNU Make directly but utilize other systems like CMake to generate Make files, which are then run by GNU Make. This is common for tasks like compiling C++ code. In the industry, AI developers, for example, use GNU Make in their work…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can do the CI pipeline well."

"We had done some research and found the Microsoft Azure DevOps VSTS was not competent enough to support Core Java lambda functions, so we picked up Atlassian Bamboo and we are happy with it."

"The most valuable features are compiling and deployment."

"One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system, and the fact that it's integrated within Oracle products and can manage statutory people in our organization, with features and functionality that are all huge selling points."

"In my experience Bamboo is scalable."

"The platform helps us with automated and timely backup. It provides data replication as well."

"The technical support provided by Atlassian is very good."

"The most valuable feature of Bamboo is that it is a good tool for CI/CD integration."

More Bamboo pros

"Makefiles are extremely easy to work with using any preferred editor. GNU Make can be run directly from the terminal, not requiring any time wasted on clicking."

"Full-featured syntax allows building strategies as simple or as complex as one wishes, and declarative approach fits the task really well. Wide adoption also means that everybody knows what GNU Make is and how to use it."

"Setup is extremely straightforward."

"I have not encountered any scalability issues with GNU Make. It is as scalable as the project's structure is, and then some."

"Make tool, originally made for the GNU operating system, helps in the generation of executable from the main program source files."

"One of the best things about GNU Make is that, it is available on almost all Linux platforms."

"GNU Make is such an essential tool that it is almost impossible to imagine working without it. Not having it, developers would probably have to resort to doing everything manually or via shell scripts."

"GNU make is a build automation utility for running builds on various Linux flavored platforms."

More GNU Make pros

Cons

"It's a little outdated. It's three years old."

"It should be much easier to use. It shouldn't require a lot of reading to be able to use it."

"One of our enterprise customers were not satisfied with the scalability of the solution."

"Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier."

"The performance around the deployment feature could be improved."

"The tool is not capable of using YAML efficiently."

"We are lacking proper support for branched builds using multiple source repositories."

"While the community may grow over time, please ensure your current/future processes are not hindered by Bamboo's faults."

More Bamboo cons

"GNU make is a bad candidate for builds that require incremental builds often, as it does not support this feature."

"Vanilla GNU Make does not support any kind of colored output. A wrapper named colormake exists to work around this, but native (opt-in) support would be welcome."

"GNU Make does not provide traditional customer support."

"Make’s reliability is very poor and is not suitable for larger or incremental builds."

"Vanilla GNU Make does not support any kind of colored output."

"Poor reliability for larger or incremental builds."

"GNU Make requires using the Tab symbol as the first symbol of command line for execution. In some text editors this can be problematic, as they automatically insert spaces instead of tabs."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."

"The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."

"The price of Bamboo is reasonable."

"There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."

"If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."

"I rate the solution's pricing a three out of five."

"GNU Make is free and open source software."

"There is no price for this product. No licensing. It’s open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Bamboo?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bamboo?

My current use case for Bamboo is not as active as it once was. The team that I worked for still uses it, but I don't work on it as much anymore. Basically, Bamboo is used for CI/CD pipelines to bu...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Bamboo?

The term multi-stage building plans in Bamboo doesn't really ring a bell for me. I just use the standard features. I would rate my overall experience with Bamboo an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GNU Make?

GNU Make is a free solution that comes with Linux, which positively impacts operational costs by eliminating licensing fees.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GNU Make?

I am not familiar enough with it to suggest any specific new features or areas for improvement. It occupies its niche well.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GNU Make?

See all answers

Comparisons

Jenkins vs Bamboo

Compared 13% of the time

GitHub Actions vs Bamboo

Compared 10% of the time

Harness vs Bamboo

Compared 6% of the time

GoCD vs Bamboo

Compared 6% of the time

Chef vs Bamboo

Compared 6% of the time

More Bamboo Competitors

Jenkins vs GNU Make

Compared 16% of the time

TeamCity vs GNU Make

Compared 16% of the time

LaunchDarkly vs GNU Make

Compared 8% of the time

Harness vs GNU Make

Compared 7% of the time

More GNU Make Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo

August 2026

Download Bamboo product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

August 2026

Download GNU Make product report

Overview

Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian apps and Oracle products, along with flexible customization and automation in CI/CD pipelines. Its intuitive interface and support for build and deployment segregation enhance functionality, while managing complex multi-environment deployments efficiently.

Bamboo is renowned for its flexibility in managing CI/CD pipelines that automate development, testing, and deployment processes. It supports extensive customization through multi-build agents and custom pipelines, integrating effectively with Bitbucket, Jira, and a wide marketplace of connectors. Despite a limited REST API and certain integration challenges, Bamboo remains effective for complex deployments. Users seek better YAML capabilities, branched builds support, and improved training to mitigate its learning curve. Enhancing approval workflows and adding GitLab compatibility could further refine its usability.

What are Bamboo's most valuable features?

Seamless Integration: Works well with Atlassian apps, Oracle products, and third-party tools like Bitbucket and Jira.
Customizable Pipelines: Supports custom pipelines tailored to user needs, enhancing automation and flexibility.
Build and Deployment Segregation: Allows for clear separation, improving overall process management.
Marketplace Connectors: Offers extensive connectors for efficient workflows.
Multi-Environment Management: Handles complex deployments across different environments effectively.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Automation in CI/CD pipelines saves time and resources.
Scalability: Supports management of multiple applications, enhancing scalability.
Integration Capability: Effective integration with Bitbucket for smoother deployments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Customization allows adaptation to unique workflows.
Reduced Complexity: Manages complex environments, reducing manual intervention.

Organizations implement Bamboo to automate tasks like data replication, backup, and recovery, benefiting from seamless integration in development workflows. In industries focusing on scalability, Kubernetes training alongside Bamboo usage enhances deployment efficiency, making it a vital tool for managing multi-environment applications.

Atlassian

GNU Make is an automation tool designed to manage the build process of software projects. It determines the parts of a program that need to be recompiled and issues the necessary commands to rebuild only those files, saving time and computation resources.

The power of GNU Make lies in its ability to handle complex build dependencies with ease. It uses makefiles to define the relationships between source files and the rules for compiling them. This allows developers to define precise build instructions that increase efficiency and reduce errors. GNU Make is compatible with various platforms, making it a versatile choice for developers working in diverse environments. Its ability to parallelize builds on multi-core systems further enhances its efficiency, ensuring faster build times and improved project workflows.

What are the most important features of GNU Make?

Automatic Dependency Tracking: Automatically detects and handles changes in files.
Parallel Execution: Utilizes multiple cores, speeding up the build process.
Platform Independence: Functions across different operating systems.
Flexible Makefile Syntax: Allows customization and advanced build rules.
Incremental Builds: Only updates changed parts, saving time and resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Reduces development time with smart file recompilation.
Cost Savings: Minimizes resource usage, cutting down operational costs.
Scalability: Adapts to projects of varying complexity seamlessly.
Reliability: Provides consistent build outputs with minimal errors.

In software development, GNU Make is particularly valuable in industries such as embedded systems, enterprise solutions, and open-source projects. Its ability to manage dependencies and handle complex builds makes it ideal for maintaining large codebases where precise and efficient builds are crucial.

GNU

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Bamboo vs. GNU Make

August 2026

Free Report: Bamboo vs. GNU Make

Find out what your peers are saying about Bamboo vs. GNU Make and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bamboo vs. GNU Make report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.