Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Stack HCI vs Dell vSAN Ready Nodes comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Azure Stack HCI provides financial benefits, efficiency, and cost savings, with added advantages for Microsoft Software Assurance users and Azure Arc access.
Sentiment score
6.3
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes provide 30-40% savings in CAPEX and OPEX, praised for cost-effective management within vSphere infrastructure.
There has been some return on investment in terms of just time usability and reduction of footprint.
The OPEX benefits are around 30 to 40% because the same engineer who manages vSphere can handle Dell vSAN Ready Nodes, eliminating the need for additional support engineers.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.7
Azure Stack HCI's customer service receives positive ratings, excelling in technical support while working on SDN training improvements.
Sentiment score
7.0
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes support is efficient but sometimes lags behind competitors in response time for complex issues.
There is always room for improvement in terms of response time and reaching knowledgeable staff quickly.
Whether we have pro support plus or just the basic level, they are helpful and reliable as long as we provide the necessary details.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
Azure Stack HCI provides scalable, reliable infrastructure with automated scaling and high availability, favored by organizations globally.
Sentiment score
7.0
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes offer flexibility and scalability, but face challenges with automation, hardware compatibility, and costs for larger setups.
For large environments with frequent scalability actions, we propose the Terraform solution that builds ESXi, does necessary configuration, and automatically starts up for associating with the existing environment.
I would rate scalability around seven because when customers want to expand capacity but all the drive slots are full, they are forced to buy new servers or nodes which adds more costs with licenses and hardware.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Azure Stack HCI, built on Hyper-V, offers scalable, stable clustering, but some find it lacks full maturity, rated 7/10.
Sentiment score
6.7
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes are stable and reliable with high user ratings, despite some initial challenges and occasional issues.
A disk group for five disks can be problematic, and customers need to tolerate downtime if the disk is not available.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Stack HCI needs improved networking management, simplified operations, faster deployment, better integration, stability, and user support.
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes need enhancements in automation, integration, scalability, and pricing to address stability and deployment challenges.
Hyper V seems to lag behind compared to VMware.
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes are useful as a product, but the lack of expansion with VMware has led customers to refrain from further upgrades.
A faster firmware lifecycle with the release of validated firmware catalogs more quickly would be a desired improvement.
In some cases, we have seen hardware failures and performance issues where performance suddenly deteriorates.
 

Setup Cost

Dell vSAN Ready Nodes are competitively priced, but costs and ROI vary, especially with cloud services integration.
The licensing is quite expensive because it's per call.
As a group under Comcast, we receive very good pricing from Dell due to our considerable business dealings.
 

Valuable Features

Azure Stack HCI optimizes performance with advanced networking, NVMe, Kubernetes, and Azure integrations for efficient data center management.
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes offer compact design, integrated management, scalability, performance, and ease of use, appealing to users.
The integration with Azure using Azure Arc is excellent.
The ability for single-team management without requiring a separate storage team for managing arrays and fiber channel switches is also a valuable feature.
I would say in-house management, administration, and storage policies are the three key differentiators compared to normal non-Dell vSAN Ready Nodes where we are leveraging external storage.
Dell's technical support is generally very good.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Stack HCI
Ranking in HCI
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Dell vSAN Ready Nodes
Ranking in HCI
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the HCI category, the mindshare of Azure Stack HCI is 3.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell vSAN Ready Nodes is 2.6%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
HCI
 

Featured Reviews

Nicholas Diesel - PeerSpot reviewer
The storage for local usage is very efficient for an HCI product but virtualization needs improvement
Azure Site Recovery is brilliant. The integration with Azure using Azure Arc is excellent. Additionally, Azure storage for local usage is very efficient for an HCI product. There has been some return on investment in terms of time usability and reduction of footprint, and obviously, HCI two emissions and other factors.
Saleh Khalid - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient consolidated storage and plug-and-play with room for more flexibility
The initial setup was straightforward. However, there is a need for detailed steps, and missing any step could result in the solution not working. The whole environment, including designing and preparation, took around two weeks, and the deployments, including shipping of the servers and everything, took another two weeks to make it production ready. It was around four weeks in total from starting design to being production ready.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stack HCI?
The pricing is very competitive unless you are talking about the actual licensing itself. The licensing is quite expensive because it's per call.
What needs improvement with Azure Stack HCI?
A little bit of the storage architecture could be improved. The integrated switching could use some enhancements. The virtualization platform always has room for improvement. Hyper V seems to lag b...
What do you like most about Dell vSAN Ready Nodes?
If I consider the overall product, I would say that it is an excellent solution that offers very good performance and stability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell vSAN Ready Nodes?
There is no specific licensing model for vSAN ReadyNodes as it is linked with Broadcom VMware's solutions rather than Dell's. As a group under Comcast, we receive very good pricing from Dell due to...
What needs improvement with Dell vSAN Ready Nodes?
There are no specific issues, but in some cases we have seen hardware failures and performance issues where performance suddenly deteriorates.
 

Also Known As

No data available
vSAN Ready Nodes
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Rackspace
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Stack HCI vs. Dell vSAN Ready Nodes and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.