Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Azure Red Hat OpenShift and Microsoft Azure are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Azure Red Hat OpenShift is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft Azure is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5. Azure Red Hat OpenShift holds a 1.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to Microsoft Azure’s 11.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Azure Red Hat OpenShift users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft Azure users who would recommend it.

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Read 11 Azure Red Hat OpenShift reviews

1,578 Views
1,483 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Read 324 Microsoft Azure reviews

48,885 Views
25,420 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Microsoft Azure

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Azure Red Hat OpenShift are competitors in the cloud services category, with Azure having an edge due to its extensive service offerings and integration capabilities, while OpenShift is preferred for advanced container orchestration.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers scalability, integration with Microsoft services, and a wide array of cloud services. Azure Red Hat OpenShift is recognized for its strong container orchestration, developer-focused tools, and hybrid cloud support.

Room for Improvement: Azure could improve in specialized container orchestration features, while OpenShift might enhance its integration with broader cloud services and reduce setup complexities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure provides streamlined deployment with comprehensive tooling, offering better service integration. In contrast, Azure Red Hat OpenShift focuses on containerization and Kubernetes with a specialized deployment model, excelling in developer-centric environments.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure typically presents a lower setup cost and flexible pricing models, yielding favorable ROI through its broad service catalog. Azure Red Hat OpenShift may have higher initial costs due to advanced features but delivers significant ROI for containerized workloads.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Microsoft Azure Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Microsoft Azure

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,287 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

324

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Azure Red Hat OpenShift is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 11.7%, down from 18.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure	11.7%
Azure Red Hat OpenShift	1.2%
Other	87.1%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

DeepakMishra

CEO, Head of Sales and Business Development at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Integrated cloud platform has streamlined app delivery and supported certified marketplace products

A potential area for improvement for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is to see managed identity support and ensure that some of the security features are not conflicting with Azure or Azure product features. I am sure in the future it will be more templatized so that we need not depend on Azure security features. Azure Red Hat OpenShift should be independent of Azure security features with respect to container scan and all that. Why would it use an Azure security feature? That is what I find. It is still yet to be GA and commonly available, but that is a strong reason for improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2832981

Cloud Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Cloud migration has reduced hardware dependency and supports secure global access to apps

The best features Microsoft Azure offers are cloud scalability, virtual machines, storage, networking, security, monitoring, and identity management. Scalability is the most valuable to our organization because Microsoft Azure allows businesses to scale resources up or down based on workload demand. This helps manage traffic spikes without buying permanent hardware. Virtual machines are also valuable as Microsoft Azure provides cloud-based Windows and Linux virtual machines to run applications, servers, and workloads. Identity and Access Management is important, as the integration with Microsoft Entra ID helps manage user authentication, role-based access, and MFA. For example, employees access business apps securely using single sign-on. Backup and disaster recovery are also important because they provide automated backups and failover options to ensure business continuity. Microsoft Azure positively impacts my organization by reducing infrastructure dependency, improving availability, and enabling remote access. Teams can access applications globally without on-premises server dependency, and in terms of cost, it is very low-cost.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's support and its automation tool that ensures we are secure and appropriately configured are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"Red Hat is a very stable product with good integration with products such as Kubernetes, and it also offers migration tools."

"It has a feature to automatically scale up or scale down. If my application is running in peak hours, it will automatically increase."

"The most valuable features of the solution are accessibility and scalability."

"It supports AKS and other projects like Kubernetes or EKS."

"Flexibility, a very well-developed interface, and ease of learning are the most valuable features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift."

"I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten."

"Technical support from Red Hat is very good."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift pros

"Azure Active Directory and Azure Active Directory Domain Services make it possible to have Azure VM's join a domain without the need for additional domain controllers."

"The ability to quickly create and manage resources is critical to getting things done, Azure just makes getting things done a lot simpler."

"Azure is a good product and I can recommend it to others."

"I would recommend Azure because there's a lot of documentation available and a lot of user guides, it has everything."

"The installation of the product is very straightforward; it's quite easy in general, the product is very stable, the performance has always been reliable, and we've found the solution to be extremely flexible."

"One feature I like in Microsoft Azure is its ability to host and run applications on virtual machines. It is a basic yet crucial capability for our team."

"There are a lot of things that we like about it. It is very easy to provision and configure. It is flexible and scalable."

"The initial setup is straightforward and the deployment can be completed within short time, and now we can deploy most components and services within a day or two."

More Microsoft Azure pros

Cons

"I would like Azure Red Hat OpenShift to be more open to new frameworks and languages. Currently, if I create a pod with Rust, it doesn't work in OpenShift, and I must create a layer of interpretation."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift's support should be improved."

"Technically, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is fine. However, its marketing could be improved, especially when compared to the robust marketing efforts of Azure, HPE, and Nutanix."

"One of the things to notice is that this product can be expensive."

"They need to improve the core licensing model."

"Automation could be improved."

"The product is expensive."

"There is room for improvement in terms of orchestration. While Azure orchestration offers valuable features, it's worth noting that it may not match the level of orchestration provided by Kubernetes itself."

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift cons

"The price needs to be lower because they're competing with AWS."

"The installation process is not very straightforward."

"There are always new features to add in terms of additional indicators, improving the looks of the dashboard and stuff. There are some dashboards that are not attractive, we are looking to make them fancier and nice-looking."

"There are a number of services offered by AWS that are not yet available on Azure."

"There is room for improvement in the product's AI capabilities and real-time data processing features."

"Cost management in Microsoft Azure can be complex, and beginners may find services difficult to navigate, so improvement is required in this area."

"It is pretty secure, but it can always be more secure."

"We have reported some bugs we encountered, and it would be good if those bugs were resolved more quickly."

More Microsoft Azure cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other cloud environments like Amazon or Google, Azure Red Hat OpenShift is an expensive solution."

"Azure Red Hat OpenShift is not a low-price solution; it's expensive. Pricing depends on the strategy and whether you buy it directly from Red Hat or the Azure portal. Additionally, some customers may need a complete disaster recovery solution, which requires additional licensing and software products for implementation, such as backups."

"It is expensive compared to a similar product."

"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The subscription models can be confusing and it would be beneficial for them to simplify them. We are on an annual subscription."

"The price of the solution can be expensive."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Its pricing model can be improved. It is variable, and if you do a simulation now, within a few months, the price can change, and your simulation would no longer be valid."

"It has the pay-as-you-go model. Its pricing should be better."

"The pricing model can be improved because we find that Azure pricing is a bit high."

"The pricing is better than AWS."

"It is operational expenditure (OPEX). There is no cost upfront. When you start using it, you have to pay the charges. Initially, the cost is less, but after you start using it more and more, the cost will go higher. It is a little bit costly, but that is okay because you get better resources. You also get better support in terms of how you create the resources. Documentation is available, and the SLAs are met."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	141
Midsize Enterprise	54
Large Enterprise	153

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

The pricing for OpenShift is similar to other solutions like Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) Studio. The plans with ARO and AWS are standard in the market. However, using OpenShift on-pre...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

My use case for Azure Red Hat OpenShift is for an employee engagement application and HR, and I have also used it for an agentic bot.

See all answers

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 17% of the time

Google Cloud vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon EKS vs Azure Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

More Azure Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 5% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 5% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift

September 2026

Download Azure Red Hat OpenShift product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

September 2026

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Also Known As

No data available

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

Overview

Azure Red Hat OpenShift provides enterprises with enhanced cloud-native flexibility and supports efficient multi-cloud migrations, simplifying infrastructure management, security, and patching.

Enterprises find Azure Red Hat OpenShift valuable for its advanced GUI, service mesh, automatic scaling, and integration capabilities. It aids regulatory compliance and streamlines application development with its DevOps integration, reducing release cycle times. The platform is appreciated for scalability, accessibility, and resilience. Users highlight its straightforward configuration, though improvements in the licensing model, cost-effectiveness, CLI, and support for data-intensive applications are needed. Orchestration, compatibility with new frameworks, and Azure dependency are areas for refinement. Built-in CI/CD tools are preferred over third-party solutions.

What are the key features of Azure Red Hat OpenShift?

Advanced GUI: Intuitive interface for streamlined management.
Service Mesh: Simplifies microservices management.
Automatic Scaling: Efficiently manages resources to meet demand.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with enterprise systems.
DevOps: Reduces release cycle time with unique integration.

Why consider Azure Red Hat OpenShift for your enterprise?

Cloud-Native Flexibility: Enhances adaptability for applications.
Security and Compliance: Aids in regulatory adherence.
Infrastructure Management: Simplifies with automation.
Scalability and Resilience: Handles workloads efficiently.

Businesses deploy Azure Red Hat OpenShift for pipeline management, containerized applications, and cloud migration. It supports banking operations, corporate integrations, and digital business development. Enterprises use it for Apache deployment in cloud platforms, advised by consultants transitioning from Broadcom to OpenShift.

Microsoft

Microsoft Azure is a versatile cloud platform known for its scalability, flexibility, and ease of use, offering comprehensive solutions like virtual machines, identity management, and data storage with robust security measures and global data centers.

Azure provides a straightforward setup with dynamic scaling and seamless integration with existing tools. Its robust security, compliance with privacy laws, and global data center presence make it a trusted choice for enterprises. With features supporting DevOps, IoT, AI/ML, and hybrid cloud environments, Azure facilitates efficient cloud migration and modernization, enhancing operational efficiency.

What are some of the key features of Microsoft Azure?

Scalability: Adjust resources automatically to meet demand.
Flexibility: Support for hybrid cloud setup and smooth integration with existing tools.
Virtual Machines: Extensive support for VMs to run various workloads.
Active Directory: Robust identity and access management services.
Data Storage: Diverse storage options for different data management needs.
Security Measures: Comprehensive security protocols and compliance support.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Microsoft Azure?

Cost Efficiency: Managed services that reduce operational costs.
Reliability: High availability with global data center coverage.
Ease of Migration: Facilitates transition from on-premises solutions to the cloud.
Operational Efficiency: User-friendly interface and extensive training resources.

Organizations primarily use Azure for infrastructure services, application hosting, and data management across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. Resellers deploy cloud services for clients in private, public, and hybrid clouds, supporting enterprise applications and digital transformation projects.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

Buyer's Guide

Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Microsoft Azure

September 2026

Free Report: Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Microsoft Azure

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Microsoft Azure and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,287 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Red Hat OpenShift vs. Microsoft Azure report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.