

Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Azure NetApp Files compete in cloud storage solutions. Azure NetApp Files appear to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and high performance.
Features: Microsoft Azure Object Storage is praised for its scalability, integration capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. Azure NetApp Files stands out with its performance, flexibility, and comprehensive file management features.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure Object Storage users often report occasional latency, the need for more streamlined management tools, and improved documentation. Azure NetApp Files users desire better integration with third-party services, easier configuration options, and enhanced user interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Object Storage is noted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Azure NetApp Files requires a more complex setup but offers excellent support once implemented.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Object Storage is considered cost-effective with good ROI benefits. Azure NetApp Files, while more expensive, provides significant ROI due to its high performance and advanced features.
I have seen a return on investment as it saves both time and money with this agile technology.
Microsoft has limitations with Azure Files, which do not support disaster recovery, so they approached NetApp for help based on their experience in on-premises and cloud storage.
They have top-notch people.
If I want to change something on my resources or directly access it via the portal, there is not a service level agreement of 100%, and sometimes it's quite difficult to access.
The customer support for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is not good.
Technical support from Microsoft is good.
Scalability is high. I would say it's probably around nine because it's quite a robust solution that can scale up to maybe even five hundred terabytes of data.
The storage is very scalable, so you can effortlessly scale it.
The downloading of high volume data and scalability processes face performance issues related to high data volumes.
Most of the time, it fits the requirement, but for drastic demands, we may need to provide quotas and other requirements to Microsoft for them to manage forecast and capacity planning.
In terms of storage stability, I believe it's robust and stable, with a high level of redundancy in the cloud backend.
The downloading of high volume data and scalability processes face performance issues related to high data volumes.
From a security standpoint, there is a question mark due to past cyber attacks.
If they bring the cost a little bit closer to what Azure Files offers, it can be a great product in the market and bring a lot of business to NetApp.
I would like for them to have more compression so that it can avoid using more storage.
When using Data Lakes for analytics and frequently pulling data from our source database to Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, there should be faster methods to download large data from Microsoft Azure Storage Blob to different locations.
They need enhancement in security aspects. Security alerts and integrations could be improved as part of lifecycle management, especially for archives and restoration requirements.
The improvement needed for Microsoft Azure Object Storage is to reduce the transactional charges, as these read and write operation charges are higher.
It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.
It's highly priced, and there's no cost reservation option available compared to Azure Files.
It's a pay-per-use solution and a good idea for proof of concept and value.
The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is cheaper compared to other competitors, such as Google or third-party solutions, which easily engages customers.
Regarding pricing for Microsoft Azure Object Storage, I find it reasonable.
The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes.
I think the most valuable feature is using the cross-region replication because this feature was not available in Azure Files, and this was the differentiator.
Since I work mostly with AI/ML, data piping, data integrations, and ETL tools, these features are valuable.
When talking about storage accounts, customers utilize Azure file as a replica of the file server, allowing them to access file shares or storage accounts from their systems, making it easy to use while automatically syncing data with the cloud.
The ability to store everything inside Blob or Object storage and use it for archiving data is beneficial.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure Object Storage | 3.3% |
| Azure NetApp Files | 3.7% |
| Other | 93.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.
Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.
What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.
Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers enhanced scalability, cost-effectiveness, and high availability, making it essential for managing large volumes of structured and unstructured data efficiently.
With features such as robust encryption, Geo-redundant storage, and seamless Office 365 integration, Azure Object Storage supports critical business workloads by providing secure, flexible, and scalable data management solutions. It handles diverse data types, ensuring optimal performance for applications and efficient lifecycle management, making it a solid choice for data storage, backup, and disaster recovery. Users leverage its support for open source tools and APIs to enhance capabilities in IoT data analytics, Kubernetes storage, and file sharing. Although optimizing certain aspects like performance consistency, cost structure, and integration ease are suggested, Azure Object Storage remains widely valued in the data storage domain.
What are the key features?Incorporated into industries such as education, public sector, and managed services, Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides reliable data management and security solutions supporting IoT analytics, container storage, and archival services. These sectors benefit from its elasticity and scalability, allowing them to handle live data streams, logs, images, and critical documents effectively.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.