Azure NetApp Files vs Everpure Evergreen One comparison

NetApp and Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. NetApp is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.2, while Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.0. NetApp holds a 3.7% mindshare in CS, compared to Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 17 Azure NetApp Files reviews

2,499 Views
1,175 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Everpure Evergreen One

Read 5 Everpure Evergreen One reviews

1,778 Views
551 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Everpure Evergreen One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2026

Azure NetApp Files and Everpure Evergreen One compete in the cloud storage solutions market. Azure NetApp Files is often highlighted for its robust feature set, while Everpure Evergreen One is praised for its cost-effectiveness and broad compatibility across platforms. Based on feature set and ROI potential, Azure NetApp Files seems to have the upper hand due to its seamless integration and high-performance capabilities within its own ecosystem.

Features: Azure NetApp Files offers dynamic storage management, seamless connections with other Azure services, and high-performance capabilities suited for demanding enterprise needs. Everpure Evergreen One provides excellent scalability, data protection, and offers integrated features for mixed-cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Azure NetApp Files could improve its affordability for small and medium-sized businesses, expand compatibility across more non-Azure platforms, and enhance feature availability for mixed-cloud environments. Everpure Evergreen One could benefit from deeper integration with specific cloud ecosystems, enhanced user interfaces for easier management, and more detailed support documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure NetApp Files provides streamlined implementation within the Azure environment, benefiting from Microsoft's extensive support. Everpure Evergreen One simplifies deployment across mixed-cloud setups with efficient customer support that addresses diverse platform needs.

Pricing and ROI: Azure NetApp Files generally involves higher initial costs but promises substantial ROI when integrated into existing Azure infrastructures, enhancing resource efficiency. Everpure Evergreen One offers competitive pricing with a cost advantage in heterogeneous environments, delivering strong ROI through its versatility and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Cloud Storage

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (6th), Public Cloud Storage Services (12th)

Everpure Evergreen One

Ranking in Cloud Storage

14th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (14th), Managed Cloud Services (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 3.7%, down from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Everpure Evergreen One is 3.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure NetApp Files	3.7%
Pure Storage Evergreen One	3.2%
Other	93.1%

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13

Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs

The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.

Read full review

Santhosh Sridhara

Cloud Architect at DXC Technology

OpEx storage model has simplified SLAs, capacity planning, and cyber‑resilient recovery

The most valuable features in Pure Storage Evergreen One are the SLAs, which are tied to the kind of services that we are going to run. These SLAs govern the consumption and the reporting as well. I find it more attractive when we are tied to a specific SLA, and the VRA is providing the services within that agreed SLA, then there is no requirement for a complete capacity assessment. The entire capacity review, assessment, and recommendations come as part of Pure Storage Evergreen One solution. Pure Storage Evergreen One has a list of services which will provide the services, including cyber resilience. First, they have complete capacity management which is done by them and which will also provide us a heads up on how we are consuming the services and where these services can be improved. Second, it will also provide us some of the key attributes, such as we can take the snapshots and LUN snapshots, which will provide a cyber-resilient copy where data can be secured in case of a cyber attack. We have an option to basically recover the earliest. Third, because of this feature and because of Pure Storage Evergreen One, I am talking about the Evergreen aspect. Because of Evergreen, we also have an option to upgrade the controllers based on the SLAs. If the agreed SLAs are not meeting the requirement, we have a provision to upgrade the controllers and so on. This is giving a good feature for us to evaluate and provide a valuable proposition to the customer who wants to use Pure Storage as a Pure OpEx model.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring downtime, which is a strong point. Based on the money spent, we can get performance improvements and high availability."

"The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes."

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent, and the solution’s combination of ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot."

"I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up."

"It has saved a lot of time. Because in the older, conventional hardware system, they need to raise a ticket to go to storage engineering, then storage engineering would increased the size. Now, it's dynamic. You don't have to do anything. This improved the time by more than 50 percent."

"Azure NetApp Files gives our clients better options."

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"We use Azure NetApp Files mainly for backup."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"The Evergreen program is excellent, and the pricing is quite reasonable. My friends who work there are doing very well and consistently achieving strong results. Like any company, they experience occasional downturns but perform impressively overall."

"We have snapshots. We put snapshots on disks, and we can save information. In the case of ransomware, everything is in the snapshot. We have a snapshot lock on it, so it's safe."

"Pure Storage has the highest Net Promoter Score in the market."

"The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous peer environment we were running on, and it seems to have a better feature set."

"The speed of the product is quite a bit better in performance than the previous environment we were running on, and it seems to have a better feature set."

"The most valuable features in Pure Storage Evergreen One are the SLAs, which are tied to the kind of services that we are going to run, and these SLAs govern the consumption and the reporting as well."

Cons

"I don’t like the solution’s configuration and support."

"The deployment process is somewhat complex compared to other storage solutions."

"Its pricing can be better."

"We would like for the files which are coming in that we can version them. So, if a file is accidentally deleted, there should have a recycle bin option where we can go back, and at least once, clean it up."

"We were looking for a clustered solution that has over-complicated things because we had it in AWS, which is Amazon."

"We would like to see more paired regions for the replication."

"This solution would be improved with more innovation."

"I would like to see multi-zone redundancy so that I don't have to worry about it. I just back up my data to that one SMB share and I know that it's replicated to a different region."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"I would love to explore more options on what Pure Storage Evergreen One can offer in general, mostly from the cybersecurity perspective and air gap."

"Many customers report that the starting price is quite high. However, the overall total cost of ownership can be reduced over time due to features like the Evergreen architecture, which allows savings through less management and environmental benefits."

"To me, I think it's a little expensive. Then again, you get what you pay for."

"The only potential drawback is that Pure Storage might be overkill if you don't need microsecond response times."

"I'm not sure if any improvements are needed."

"It would be nice to have support in Swedish."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

"Our pricing has not been determined because we are still waiting on additional features."

"Its price is double the price of the premium disks, which is the main reason why customers don't go for this solution in the end."

"NetApp is a premium offering, so it's not a cheap product, but it is well-priced. It combines a couple of properties which customers like us are willing to pay. Could it be cheaper? Yes, but if you combine fully supported, fully managed, easily provisioned, scalable, and quick all in one product, it's a good selling point. You can ask a lot of money for all these. If you have a use case like we do, it's a perfect match. It's like the Porsche of storage solutions in the cloud. It is totally worth the cost."

"The price of Azure NetApp Files could be better."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum. A one terabyte minimum would be better."

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is very good."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Retailer

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

Because of our own governance, we can propose options for consumption, and we also provide both CapEx as well as OpEx based solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure Storage Evergreen One?

I would love to explore more options on what Pure Storage Evergreen One can offer in general, mostly from the cybersecurity perspective and air gap. If the solution can be such a way where it can b...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pure Storage Evergreen One?

We are subscribed for Pure Storage Evergreen One and Pure1, which allows us to have an OpEx kind of a model working along with them. This is providing us an advantage. Pure Storage Evergreen One an...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 15% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon FSx vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

HPE GreenLake vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 20% of the time

Dell APEX vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 12% of the time

HPE GreenLake for File Storage vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 8% of the time

NetApp Keystone vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Everpure Evergreen One

Compared 6% of the time

More Everpure Evergreen One Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

March 2026

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Everpure Evergreen One

March 2026

Download Everpure Evergreen One product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

Pure Storage Evergreen One

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

Everpure Evergreen One is recognized for delivering valuable features with SLAs aligned with service requirements, particularly appealing to industries craving low latency and advanced tech refresh capabilities.

Everpure Evergreen One enables organizations to manage primary storage for virtual machines in data centers with robustness and efficiency. It supports VMware and VDI environments while providing substantial performance improvements. Users are offered enhanced data security through frequent snapshot backups and an intuitive interface that facilitates rapid feature adoption complemented by guided workshops. Its architecture boasts speed, making it a reliable choice for short-term and long-term storage needs, although starting costs can be high. Companies find that operational expenses are reduced over time due to its efficient design, contributing to superior capacity management and cyber resilience, along with seamless API integration.

What are the key features of Everpure Evergreen One?

SLAs Aligned with Service Requirements: Guarantees tailored to organizational needs, enhancing operational reliability.
Comprehensive Capacity Management: Facilitates effective resource allocation and device management.
Cyber Resilience with LUN Snapshots: Regular backups that ensure enhanced data protection against unforeseen events.
Controller Upgrades: Maintains peak performance aligned with service level agreements.
Fast Architecture: Supports industries requiring low latency and quick data accessibility.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Everpure Evergreen One?

OpEx Model: Flexible operational expenditure through Pure1, fostering capital efficiency.
Simplicity and Speed: Appreciated for its straightforward operation and rapid processing capabilities.
Seamless Integration: Ease of incorporating APIs with servers, promoting streamlined workflow management.
Reasonable Pricing: Viewed as cost-effective given its long-term ownership benefits and advanced features.

Implementations of Everpure Evergreen One in industries often focus on enhancing infrastructure consumption for reseller businesses. It serves as a primary storage solution for virtual machines, where performance and security are paramount. It supports organizations by addressing both short-term storage needs and providing resilience for long durations, which is crucial for data centers managing extensive VMware and VDI infrastructures. Industries benefit from its fast performance and guided workshops that assist teams in leveraging the full potential of its technologies.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Aflac 5. Allstate 6. Amazon 7. American Express 8. American Greetings 9. Ameriprise Financial 10. ATT 11. Autodesk 12. Bank of America 13. Barclay's 14. Baxter International 15. Berkshire Hathaway 16. BlackRock 17. Boeing 18. Bristol-Myers Squibb 19. Capital One 20. Caterpillar 21. Citigroup 22. Coca-Cola 23. Comcast2 4. ConocoPhillips 25. Constellation Brands 26. CVS Health 27. Dell 28. Disney 29. Dominion Energy 30. Eli Lilly and Company 31. Equinix 32. ExxonMobil

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One

March 2026

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Everpure Evergreen One report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.