Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs JFrog Xray comparison

Microsoft and JFrog are both solutions in the Container Security category. Microsoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.1, while JFrog is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.8. Microsoft holds a 0.7% mindshare in Container Security, compared to JFrog’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JFrog users who would recommend it.

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Read 40 Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) reviews

839 Views
276 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

JFrog Xray

Read 8 JFrog Xray reviews

3,038 Views
762 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

JFrog Xray

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

JFrog Xray and Azure Kubernetes Service compete in the tech sector. JFrog Xray has an edge in security analysis, while AKS is favored for container orchestration within the Azure ecosystem.

Features: JFrog Xray is praised for deep security scanning, continuous vulnerability reporting, and dependency monitoring. AKS offers container orchestration, automated upgrades, and scalability within Azure. The key differentiator is JFrog Xray's security focus versus AKS's comprehensive management and integration features.

Room for Improvement: JFrog Xray could improve scalability, integration with other DevOps tools, and documentation. AKS needs enhanced monitoring tools, simplified configuration, and improved customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JFrog Xray is easy to deploy but needs better documentation and support. AKS integrates well with Azure but has a complex initial setup and mixed reviews on customer service.

Pricing and ROI: JFrog Xray is cost-efficient with tangible ROI but could offer better pricing options. AKS has higher upfront costs but justifies them with extensive features and integration. JFrog Xray stands out in cost-effectiveness, while AKS offers a comprehensive feature set worth its price.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. JFrog Xray Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. JFrog Xray

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Ranking in Container Security

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

JFrog Xray

Ranking in Container Security

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JFrog Xray is 3.9%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Shaijith KB

Senior System Engineer at General Directorate of Residence and Foreigners Affairs (GDRFA)

Professional services boost confidence but pricing and user-friendliness need attention

We have multiple solutions such as SimpliVity, Nutanix, and DXRail, which are all part of our Ansible-based system. It gives us more confidence and we can control our groups effectively. The solution is not particularly user-friendly for novice administrators, making it challenging to understand certain aspects. Templates are not readily available, requiring users to build their own worksheets and everything from scratch. This is a main decentralization we observe compared to VMware. We have tested various solutions including Rancher, RHEL, Canonical from SUSE, and the bare metal version from RHEL direct. Since pricing is not a major concern, we chose the best fit for our application, which was specifically designed for this particular platform.

Read full review

Mokshi Pandita

DevOps Engineer at Rambøll Danmark A/S

An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project

We could create any number of repositories, but we can create only thirty projects with JFrog Xray. If I want things to work, it has to be one project and multiple repositories that belong to different real projects. So I have a limitation of thirty projects, despite being a premium customer. JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard. Although I am able to generate reports, there is no proper dashboard where I can see the total number of vulnerabilities, the total number of license issues, and how many vulnerabilities are fixed. Second, I found the shift left approach missing with JFrog Xray. JFrog Xray has integration with IDEs, but it does not tell you about the vulnerabilities until the artifact is created. However, Snyk could directly integrate with your repository and would not allow you to build unless you fix the problem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has great support and is flexible to understand."

"The Front Door and Service Bus are the most vital features"

"AKS as a service is very good when you need to leverage applications or functions with much variability in their usage because you're trying to be as efficient as you can with resources."

"The integration with Azure's security capabilities is very good. The Azure managed identity and integration with the Azure application gateway for App Ingress are valuable features. Additionally, it is a very stable tool."

"Its support team resolves technical issues accurately."

"The product serves the purpose of helping streamline our company's application deployment and scaling processes."

"The most valuable features of AKS are rollback updates, high availability, easy management, speedy execution and deployment."

"The integration with Azure's security capabilities is very good. The Azure-managed identity and integration with the Azure application gateway for App Ingress are valuable features. Additionally, it is a very stable tool."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pros

"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."

"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."

"Good reporting functionalities."

"The most valuable features of JFrog Xray are its curation capabilities, its native integration with Artifactory, scanning for vulnerabilities, and license compliance features."

"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."

"The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."

More JFrog Xray pros

Cons

"The product’s cost could be reduced."

"Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is more flexible but more complex to maintain."

"There is room for improvement in automation processes, as well."

"The engineering team can reduce the management of the platform itself by improving the data plane part of the system to upload more management."

"I would like to see the stability get more synchronized."

"More control over Infra scanning can be introduced."

"The costs are rising rapidly, and we have not seen any cost reductions by moving to Azure."

"I would like to see a graphical user interface."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cons

"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."

"The out-of-the-box PostgreSQL provided is not stable, which is why we are considering enterprise support."

"X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL."

"I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images."

"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."

"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."

"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."

"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."

More JFrog Xray cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We could spend as little as $25 or $30 a month on Kubernetes Services, compared to the typical $100 a month expenditure for a virtual machine."

"The cost of the solution is extremely high. Both Amazon and Azure cost extremely high. Given the basic features like when they are coming over the cluster nodes, we think over ten times before giving the solution to clients. No matter how many offerings the solution provides, it becomes so much of a burden that you are not even getting back your invested money from customers."

"We are facing a significant challenge regarding OEM licensing. The issue arises from the fact that certain licenses required for our own purposes are not provided by Microsoft's licensing. Consequently, we are unsure about the most suitable mobile license provisioning model offered by third-party providers."

"The price of AKS is expensive. We pay approximately $10,000 monthly."

"As you scale your operations, AKS becomes more cost-effective."

"The control plane is free and we only pay for the usage and time."

"It is an expensive solution."

"Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is an expensive solution"

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

Could you please tell what areas of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) you think could be improved or enhanced? It doesn't necessarily have to be something advanced. Perhaps there are some minor things...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

Could you please describe your customers' usual use cases for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

See all answers

What do you like most about JFrog Xray?

JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JFrog Xray?

X-ray needs improvement in supporting more than one database, as it currently only supports PostgreSQL. More support during troubleshooting sessions would also be beneficial.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JFrog Xray?

Our primary use case for X-ray includes multiple activities such as security and vulnerability scanning. We already use Black Duck for these purposes, and we are evaluating how JFrog Xray can offer...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 75% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 5% of the time

SUSE Rancher vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 4% of the time

Orca Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Competitors

Black Duck vs JFrog Xray

Compared 14% of the time

Trivy vs JFrog Xray

Compared 14% of the time

Veracode vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

GitHub Dependabot vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs JFrog Xray

Compared 6% of the time

More JFrog Xray Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

June 2025

Download Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) product report

Buyer's Guide

JFrog Xray

June 2025

Download JFrog Xray product report

Also Known As

No data available

JFrog Security Essentials

Overview

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications using Kubernetes. With AKS, developers can focus on building applications while Azure takes care of the underlying infrastructure. It offers features like automatic scaling, monitoring, and security, ensuring high availability and reliability. AKS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, enabling easy integration with existing workflows. It also provides a flexible and open-source environment, allowing developers to use their preferred tools and frameworks. With AKS, organizations can accelerate their application development and deployment processes, while reducing operational overheads.

Microsoft

JFrog is on a mission to enable continuous updates through Liquid Software, empowering developers to code high-quality applications that securely flow to end-users with zero downtime. The world’s top brands such as Amazon, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Uber, VMware, and Spotify are among the 4500 companies that already depend on JFrog to manage binaries for their mission-critical applications. JFrog is a privately-held, global company, and is a proud sponsor of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation [CNCF].

If you are a team player and you care and you play to WIN, we have just the job you're looking for.

As we say at JFrog: "Once You Leap Forward You Won't Go Back!"

JFrog

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

google, amazon, cisco, netflix, oracle, vmware, facebook

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. JFrog Xray

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. JFrog Xray

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. JFrog Xray and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. JFrog Xray report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.