We performed a comparison between Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and JFrog Xray based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the autoscaling and self-healing."
"The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages."
"The most valuable features of AKS are rollback updates, high availability, easy management, speedy execution and deployment."
"The serverless capability and auto scale feature are the most valuable."
"It is easy to maintain the solution."
"The setup was straightforward and it took one hour to deploy."
"The most valuable features of AKS are scalability, deployability, and automation."
"It is appealing to us due to its complexity, which aligns well with our requirements."
"JFrog Xray's reporting feature has a lot of options in it, including scanning."
"Good reporting functionalities."
"If multiple dependencies and vulnerabilities are found in a project, JFrog Xray is intelligent enough to tell you which vulnerability to target first."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"JFrog Xray shows us a list of vulnerabilities that can impact our code."
"I would say that this solution has helped our organization by allowing us to automate a lot of the processes."
"The most valuable feature of JFrog Xray is the display of the entire internal dependencies hierarchy."
"It would be nice if they could handle the management of personal information more efficiently."
"It just loses out because you have less access to it programmatically, with less technical or customizable access."
"The initial setup of AKS is complicated. The setup depends on the cluster, nodes, and lots of other things. There are also lots of extremely critical small devices. Moreover, you will have to pay them even while setting up the solution. It is not like you setup first and then pay for it."
"This is a fairly expensive solution, which can make it prohibitive for smaller organizations."
"There is room for improvement in automation processes, as well."
"We would like to see the addition of a service report from the server for this solution, so that we can monitor the health of server operations."
"Its integration functions could be enhanced."
"In terms of cost perspective, they could make the product more affordable."
"Lacks deeper reporting, the ability to compare things."
"JFrog Xray does not have a dashboard."
"Since we have been using the solution via APIs, there are some limitations in the APIs."
"JFrog Xray's documentation and error logging could be improved."
"I think that the user interface should be expanded to provide customers with a better dashboard for reviewing their feedback regarding their images and the vulnerabilities that are associated with the images."
"The speed of JFrog Xray should improve. Other solutions have better performance."
"Reporting is crucial, but it is lacking in the current tool. Every organization seeks specific data points rather than general information. Therefore, we require customized reports from the Xray tool."
More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is ranked 13th in Container Security with 32 reviews while JFrog Xray is ranked 18th in Container Security with 7 reviews. Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is rated 8.2, while JFrog Xray is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) writes "Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JFrog Xray writes "An intelligent solution that prioritizes which vulnerability to target first in your project". Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is most compared with OpenShift, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, SUSE Rancher, Qualys VMDR and Tenable.io Container Security, whereas JFrog Xray is most compared with Black Duck, Snyk, Veracode, Mend.io and Trivy. See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. JFrog Xray report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
