Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection comparison

Azure Front Door vs. Microsoft Purview Information Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.9

Azure Front Door offers ROI through cost reduction, quick setup, and simplified management, prompting proactive adoption amid system phase-out.

Sentiment score

6.4

Microsoft Purview enhances protection, automates compliance, reduces response time, and supports growth, though exact savings are hard to quantify.

Azure Front Door offers a quick return on investment once it is set up.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Co-Founder at arpa

Purview can do a quick scan, and it doesn't use human resources, so it gets time to do things that we need humans to focus on.

Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade

The E5 license comes with different solutions like data discovery classification, CASB, DLP solutions, and Defender for Cloud.

Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

The cost of data loss and your data going to a competitor is potentially massive.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Client Experience Officer at 1234 Micro Technologies

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.1

Azure Front Door's customer service is mixed; some praise responsiveness and documentation, others find problem-solving quality inconsistent.

Sentiment score

4.0

Users experience inconsistent Microsoft Purview support, citing slow responses and unresolved issues, despite some improvements in visibility and engagement.

I am able to set up a critical call with Microsoft, and they respond quickly to tickets with the highest severity.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Co-Founder at arpa

Sometimes, I get a fast and knowledgeable response, while other times, I've experienced delays and received no resolution.

Client Experience Officer at 1234 Micro Technologies

It's hard to be an ambassador for a product when you know it will be hard to get support.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade

After our issues are reported, it takes a long time to find a resolution.

SantoshDeshpande

Director Security Architecture at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.1

Azure Front Door offers scalable, reliable global capabilities, highly rated by users, though it may become costly with extensive use.

Sentiment score

6.0

Microsoft Purview Information Protection is praised for scalability despite some concerns with data analytics speed and policy update intervals.

I find that Front Door can become expensive for large-scale projects with more transactions and users.

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

I consider the scalability of Azure Front Door to be strong.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Co-Founder at arpa

It can be scaled across different departments organization-wide very quickly and easily.

Client Experience Officer at 1234 Micro Technologies

It can handle large collections of data without issues.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade

Scalability can be improved by reducing these intervals.

Ayse Kocak

Information Technology Senior Expert at Garanti Teknoloji

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.4

Azure Front Door is praised for stability and performance, with minor DNS issues and advantages in updates via Azure Portal.

Sentiment score

7.0

Microsoft Purview is stable and reliable, with minor delays and occasional drawbacks, fostering user trust and wide deployment.

I rate Azure Front Door's stability a nine because it is easy to make updates through Azure Portal.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Co-Founder at arpa

Once implemented, I haven't had issues with its consistency.

Client Experience Officer at 1234 Micro Technologies

The product is stable, and whatever it does, it does better than any other thing.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Since identity is where everything is based, if that goes down, you're screwed.

reviewer2778771

Director, Network & Cloud Infrastructure at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Azure Front Door needs improvements in multi-cloud support, pricing, user interface, DDoS protection, and enhanced functionalities as per feedback.

Microsoft Purview requires better integration, pricing, navigation, and feature enhancements to address user concerns about functionality and support.

If I could use Azure Front Door with private IP addresses, it would be more beneficial.

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

It relies on the WAF module where users must configure rate-limiting rules, as it does not automatically sense malicious spikes in traffic.

reviewer2226693

Architect at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

The only significant adjustment required is with URL set parameters that need to be passed for an existing domain.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Co-Founder at arpa

Effectiveness in Microsoft Purview Information Protection means enforcing the policy and making sure it works consistently across non-Microsoft products as well.

SantoshDeshpande

Director Security Architecture at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

A lot of functionality in Microsoft Purview Information Protection is not exposed in an API officially yet, which has made a lot of implementation work difficult because we have to do click ops instead of DevOps.

Jp Bourget

CEO at Blue Cycle

Having a roadmap or updates about new releases would be helpful for demonstrating to clients.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Client Experience Officer at 1234 Micro Technologies

Setup Cost

Azure Front Door offers flexible, tiered pricing praised for balancing cost and features, though premium levels may seem expensive.

Microsoft Purview offers competitive pricing, flexible enterprise licenses, and cost-effective bundled solutions, despite some complexity in licensing options.

Azure Front Door is cheaper for small projects, companies, or applications compared to using separate tools.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

I talked to people who had compared it to other products on the market, and they're spending five figures to get started.

Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade

The E5 license covers most of the solutions for different technologies, so that way, it is good and more affordable compared to any other solution.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

Our focus is on helping customers maximize their software investment.

JohnAssouline

Business Development Manager, Transformational Services at Dell Technologies

Valuable Features

Azure Front Door enhances security, performance, and global reach with features like SSL offloading, load-balancing, and traffic analytics.

Microsoft Purview enhances data protection with encryption, automated labeling, and compliance, excelling in Microsoft ecosystem integration and management.

Azure Front Door provides DDoS protection and features related to WAF.

Azure Consultant at cloudshift

Azure Front Door includes a built-in web application firewall, which performs signature-based checks of the request payload, offering protection against common attacks or malicious requests.

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Front Door report

Co-Founder at arpa

Microsoft Copilot is an advantage because it's enterprise-grade AI.

JohnAssouline

Business Development Manager, Transformational Services at Dell Technologies

It's paramount to have a single solution for information protection.

Client Experience Officer at 1234 Micro Technologies

Regardless of the education, the employee might share the information anyway, so the AI shouldn't be the first point of failure. It should be a human making good decisions.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Mgr Data Engineering at Avanade

Categories and Ranking

Azure Front Door

Ranking in Microsoft Security Suite

18th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (4th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (13th)

Microsoft Purview Informati...

Ranking in Microsoft Security Suite

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Governance (7th), Data Privacy Management Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Microsoft Security Suite category, the mindshare of Azure Front Door is 2.3%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Information Protection is 2.0%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Microsoft Security Suite Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Information Protection	2.0%
Azure Front Door	2.3%
Other	95.7%

Microsoft Security Suite

Featured Reviews

reviewer2226693

Architect at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Optimizing global application performance with robust security measures and advanced traffic management

DDoS capabilities in Azure Front Door could certainly be improved. Although Microsoft states it comes with basic DDoS protections out of the box, I find it often ineffectual in mitigating thousands of requests from a single source in a short span of time. User then have to rely on the WAF module where users must configure rate-limiting rules, as it does not automatically sense malicious spikes in traffic. I believe Front Door should have an out-of-the-box premium DDoS protection that can automatically detect and block malicious traffic. I would appreciate improvements in the turnaround time for support, especially since issues with Azure Front Door are usually critical for businesses. If there is an issue, it often results in downtime for line of business applications. I have faced this situation multiple times as one of the largest financial institutions in India is hosted there, adhering to strict SLAs that require prompt responses.

Read full review

Achieve comprehensive data protection with reliable performance and room for enhanced discovery accuracy

Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech

The product is still in a growing phase. I could see that many use cases in their product are not capable enough in terms of detecting or protecting. Compared to other products, they are in the middle of bringing their solution up to the mark, so it is not a full-grown solution. They have to get more accurate results in terms of data discovery and classification. The second thing is their support; support from Microsoft takes a lot of time to get a response from their support team. The third thing is their OCR capability is not that great in terms of identifying the documents. We would love to see response times of less than 24 hours. Additionally, there is no way to check the policy's current status in terms of whether it got synced or not. You have to wait and test the use cases after 24 hours or after 48 hours, and once it starts working, then it appears the policy got implemented.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsoft Security Suite solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Front Door?

I am not sure about the pricing but believe Azure Front Door might require a higher cost due to its entry point nature.

What needs improvement with Azure Front Door?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

In my experience with Microsoft Purview Information Protection, the experience of pricing, setup costs, and licensing is confusing, especially knowing what I have to do for add-ons with buying SCUs...

What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

I think the role of sensitivity labels in guiding AI interaction with Microsoft Purview Information Protection is pretty good, but for us, it's too general. It says, "Here's a dataset" and because ...

What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

My main use case for Microsoft Purview Information Protection is sensitivity labeling, as I use it for exposing labeling for inside Teams and outside Teams.

Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare vs Azure Front Door

Compared 13% of the time

Akamai vs Azure Front Door

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Global Accelerator vs Azure Front Door

Compared 9% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Azure Front Door

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Front Door Competitors

Varonis Platform vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Cyera vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 7% of the time

BigID Next vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Data Governance vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Priva vs Microsoft Purview Information Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Purview Information Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Download Azure Front Door product report

Azure Front Door

February 2026

Microsoft Purview Information Protection

January 2026

Microsoft Purview Information Protection report

Download Microsoft Purview Information Protection product report

Also Known As

Azure Front-Door

Microsoft Information Protection

Overview

Azure Front Door enhances web application performance and security by leveraging traffic inspection, SSL offloading, and a web application firewall. It enables intelligent routing, load balancing, and global resource deployment while providing essential features for online application security.

Azure Front Door integrates GitOps for seamless deployment, offering significant capabilities in giant networks like CDN functionalities and DDoS protection. Its advanced configurations include traffic analytics and transit layer security. Despite its affordability and scalability, users see room for improvement in global load balancing and private IP address support, citing integration challenges with other cloud vendors. The interface may appear complex, and some users desire more transparent pricing, better DDoS defenses, and enhanced monitoring. This platform is especially beneficial for securing external traffic and optimizing content delivery, providing DNS integration and disaster recovery mechanisms.

What are the key features of Azure Front Door?

Traffic Inspection: Enhances security with comprehensive traffic analysis at the network level.
SSL Offloading: Streamlines SSL certificate management and encryption processes.
Web Application Firewall: Offers protection against web vulnerabilities and threats.
Global Resource Implementation: Facilitates deployment across multiple regions.
Intelligent Routing and Load Balancing: Optimizes traffic distribution for efficient performance.
Bot and DDoS Protection: Shields applications from malicious traffic and attacks.
CDN Capabilities: Accelerates content delivery with local caching and optimized routing.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Affordability: Provides robust features at competitive pricing.
Scalability: Adapts easily to growing traffic demands and business needs.
Security: Delivers comprehensive defenses against cyber threats.
Performance Optimization: Enhances application responsiveness and delivery speed.
Global Reach: Supports globally distributed applications with ease.

In industries focusing on online presence and global user engagement, Azure Front Door is invaluable for optimizing web application performance. E-commerce platforms deploy it to secure transactions and enhance load times. Media companies leverage its CDN and security features to ensure seamless content delivery. Enterprises with international operations find it crucial for reliable and secure data access across regions.

Microsoft

Implement Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) to help you discover, classify, and protect sensitive information wherever it lives or travels.

MIP capabilities are included with Microsoft 365 Compliance and give you the tools to know your data, protect your data, and prevent data loss.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft