Azure Front Door vs Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Front Door and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Microsoft Security Suite solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Front Door vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Rules Engine is a valuable feature.""I am impressed with the tool's integrations.""You can assign as many web application firewall policies as you want to the same instance of Front Door.""I particularly appreciate its load-balancing capabilities as it allows us to manage multiple instances and support a global presence effectively.""The most valuable feature is that you can implement resources globally. It does not depend on location and ability or something like that. This is to connect clients around the world.""Has a great application firewall and we like the security.""The solution is good.""It inspects the traffic at the network level before it comes into Azure. We can do SSL offloading, and it can detect abnormalities before the traffic comes into the application. It can be used globally and is easy to set up. It is also quite stable and scalable."

More Azure Front Door Pros →

"The solution is up-to-date and helps prevent zero-day attacks.""The product's stability is very high...The scalability of the product is amazing.""One valuable feature is the Microsoft Security Scorecard.""The solution helps identify threats and vulnerabilities.""The product’s most valuable features are compliance, recommendations, and inventories."

More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pros →

Cons
"The product needs to improve its latency.""The product's features are limited compared to Cloudflare. The tool also doesn't work well in a hybrid environment. I would like to see a way to add personalized APIs in the system.""There is room for improvement and they're working on it.""The user interface needs improvement as it is difficult to create the mapping to link the problem with your private address sources.""This is a relatively expensive solution.""I'm responsible for the governance and cost control of Azure. I'm not a specialist in any products and therefore I couldn't really speak effectively to features that are lacking or missing.""There's a limitation on the amount of global rules we can add.""We should be able to use Front Door defenders with multiple cloud vendors. Currently, they can be used only with the Azure cloud. Azure Front Door should also be able to do global load balancing and provide internal front door services. Microsoft should clearly define what Traffic Manager, Application Gateway, and Azure Front Door products do. These are similar products, and people get confused between these products."

More Azure Front Door Cons →

"The setup phase of the product is not that easy and needs a person to have a certain level of expertise.""It is challenging to extract and customize reports from the system.""Integration can be improved.""The general support could be improved.""The technical support takes too much time to resolve tickets."

More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is on a pay-as-you-go basis."
  • "The solution is a bit expensive."
  • "The product is expensive."
  • "The pricing of the solution is good."
  • "The transition to the premium tier has led to increased costs, making it more expensive than the classic tier."
  • More Azure Front Door Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product’s pricing is medium."
  • "The licensing model follows a per-user per-month structure."
  • "I rate the product's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."
  • "The tool is a bit costly."
  • More Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Microsoft Security Suite solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the… more »
    Top Answer:The transition to the premium tier has led to increased costs, making it more expensive than the classic tier. However, we acknowledge that this pricing reflects additional features and capabilities.
    Ranking
    15th
    Views
    1,957
    Comparisons
    1,691
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    8.7
    27th
    Views
    249
    Comparisons
    210
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Azure Front-Door
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Front Door is a global, scalable entry-point that uses the Microsoft global edge network to create fast, secure, and widely scalable web applications. With Front Door, you can transform your global consumer and enterprise applications into robust, high-performing personalized modern applications with contents that reach a global audience through Azure.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    Defender Vulnerability Management delivers asset visibility, intelligent assessments, and built-in remediation tools for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and network devices. Leveraging Microsoft threat intelligence, breach likelihood predictions, business contexts, and devices assessments, Defender Vulnerability Management rapidly and continuously prioritizes the biggest vulnerabilities on your most critical assets and provides security recommendations to mitigate risk.

    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company33%
    Computer Software Company33%
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Healthcare Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Front Door vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Front Door vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Front Door is ranked 15th in Microsoft Security Suite with 10 reviews while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is ranked 27th in Microsoft Security Suite with 5 reviews. Azure Front Door is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Azure Front Door writes " An easy -to-setup stable solution that enables implementing resources globally and has a good technical support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management writes "The vulnerability assessment is very accurate because it runs directly into the vulnerability database". Azure Front Door is most compared with Amazon CloudFront, Cloudflare, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai and AWS Global Accelerator, whereas Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Sentinel. See our Azure Front Door vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management report.

    See our list of best Microsoft Security Suite vendors.

    We monitor all Microsoft Security Suite reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.