We performed a comparison between Azure Data Factory and SAP Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The data copy template is a valuable feature."
"The most important feature is that it can help you do the multi-threading concepts."
"The initial setup is very quick and easy."
"The most valuable aspect is the copy capability."
"Allows more data between on-premises and cloud solutions"
"Feature-wise, one of the most valuable ones is the data flows introduced recently in the solution."
"The scalability of the product is impressive."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and the readily available adapters for connecting with various sources."
"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."
"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."
"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."
"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."
"The one element of the solution that we have used and could be improved is the user interface."
"We require Azure Data Factory to be able to connect to Google Analytics."
"The performance could be better. It would be better if Azure Data Factory could handle a higher load. I have heard that it can get overloaded, and it can't handle it."
"Sometimes I need to do some coding, and I'd like to avoid that. I'd like no-code integrations."
"The product could provide more ways to import and export data."
"There's no Oracle connector if you want to do transformation using data flow activity, so Azure Data Factory needs more connectors for data flow transformation."
"The solution needs to be more connectable to its own services."
"It does not appear to be as rich as other ETL tools. It has very limited capabilities."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."
"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."
"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."
"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."
Azure Data Factory is ranked 1st in Data Integration with 81 reviews while SAP Replication Server is ranked 27th in Data Integration with 6 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0, while SAP Replication Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Replication Server writes "Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, Snowflake and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, whereas SAP Replication Server is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Oracle GoldenGate, Fivetran, SSIS and SAP Data Services. See our Azure Data Factory vs. SAP Replication Server report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
