IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs. SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server

Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Provides good visibility into our jobs, reduces workload, and is easy to use
We have multiple technologies, and we have different types of jobs, such as Informatica jobs, SAP jobs, database jobs, web service jobs, etc. In... Read more →
SouvikGhosh
The solution consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management
Before implementing Axway, we were doing script-based point-to-point file transfers using a shell script. That means if a file has to go from... Read more →
Use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
July 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: July 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
622,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
  • "This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."
  • "The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
  • "You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."
  • "Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
  • "BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
  • "You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."
  • "There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    622,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
    What is the biggest difference between Oracle DAC Scheduler and Control-M?
    Top Answer:Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:The reporting is top-notch. I haven't found any other applications on the market that can replicate what Control-M… more »
    Read all 46 answers   →
    What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?
    Top Answer:Axway consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management. Now, all we… more »
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY Man...
    Top Answer:I don't know the exact cost of the Amplify license, but the support agreement costs around $30,000 annual.
    What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer?
    Top Answer:One area of improvement is troubleshooting. When a transfer fails, they provide little information about the login… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    SecureTransport, Axway SecureTransport, AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, AMPLIFY MFT
    Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
    Learn More
    BMC
    Axway
    SolarWinds
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility
    As a multi-protocol MFT gateway, Axway SecureTransport provides the flexibility you need to support virtually any MFT use case. Secure, manage, and track file flows among people and applications inside your enterprise, and beyond your firewall to your user communities, mobile devices, and the cloud. Perform high-volume automated file transfers between systems, sites, lines of business and external partners, to user-driven communications and mobile, folder- and portal-based file sharing.

    Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

    Offer
    Learn more about Control-M
    Learn More
    Learn more about Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer
    Learn More
    Learn more about SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    BNP Paribas Securities Services, Bollor_, E.ON AG Group, BMW Group, IdenTrust, Gassco, International Post Corporation, SNCF, DB Schenker Logistics, Logius, CSCA, La Poste
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    July 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: July 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    622,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is ranked 9th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 2 reviews while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is ranked 28th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is rated 8.6, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer writes "The solution consolidated all of our communications into one platform, simplifying network and port management". On the other hand, Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer is most compared with Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, MOVEit, AWS Transfer for SFTP, IBM Sterling File Gateway and BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, whereas SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is most compared with AWS Transfer for SFTP.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.