Axonius vs Qualys Exposure Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Axonius and Qualys solutions aren't in the same category. Axonius is ranked #3 in CASM , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 26.8% mindshare in the category. Qualys is ranked #2 in VM , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Axonius users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

Axonius

Read 11 Axonius reviews

6,788 Views
4,752 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys Exposure Management

Read 102 Qualys Exposure Management reviews

22,494 Views
14,171 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Axonius

Qualys Exposure Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Axonius and Qualys Exposure Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Armis, Axonius and others in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM).

To learn more, read our detailed Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,743 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axonius

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Vendor Risk Management (8th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd)

Qualys Exposure Management

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (3rd), Vulnerability Management (2nd), Configuration Management Databases (3rd), Container Security (10th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Axonius is designed for Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) and holds a mindshare of 26.8%, down 32.1% compared to last year.
Qualys Exposure Management, on the other hand, focuses on Vulnerability Management, holds 4.0% mindshare, down 7.1% since last year.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Axonius	26.8%
Armis	11.0%
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	10.0%
Other	52.2%

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qualys Exposure Management	4.0%
Wiz	4.8%
Tenable Nessus	3.6%
Other	87.6%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Zhtay Zhtay

senior security engineer at a educational organization with 5,001-10,000 employees

Asset discovery has transformed how we find unprotected devices and deploy endpoint defenses

The best features Axonius offers, in my opinion, are asset discovery, finding rogue devices, and vulnerability management. When I mention device discovery and management, the speed of discovery, the level of detail, and network-level discovery stand out to me. Axonius has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we discover thousands upon thousands of devices that don't have EDR tools, which means they are not protected. With Axonius, we were able to find them and deploy the EDR tool that they needed. I can share that we found about the Linux servers and Windows servers, hundreds of them, that were deployed. They were re-imaged and didn't have an EDR tool, and the integration with other tools proved that these devices are live on our network, and they just don't have a specific tool that we need to deploy to them.

Read full review

Ajay Paul

System Engineer at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Vulnerability management has prioritized high‑risk patching and simplified bulk system reporting

The primary issue is with the reporting functionality. Even though we fix vulnerabilities, the reports do not reflect the changes immediately. Sometimes we need to manually run a script to scan the systems before Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management will update the scan results. The main issue is the reporting delay, and sometimes the Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management agent will not scan the system, which means we do not receive accurate reports in a timely manner. Additionally, there are many metrics for calculating vulnerabilities, such as the Qualys ID, severity scores, CVSS scores, and other metrics. The abundance of information can be confusing. These two aspects are the most significant negatives I have experienced with this tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With this solution in place, we are now 100% compliant along with security functions or operations area management."

"Axonius offers excellent features including ease of use, the ability to ingest all assets at one central display, creating multiple visualization dashboards, the ability to create an enforcement center to complete tasks and support the program, and support for government operations."

"Overall, I would rate Axonius an eight out of ten."

"I like that the tool has a user-friendly interface. It helps organizations and big companies improve business requirements and control processes."

"Axonius provides preconfigured dashboards that can be customized to your needs."

"The solution's technical support was good...The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward."

"he best feature I found in Axonius is that it shows us the duration of eCheck, and it shows us what device is down and in which part of the system life cycle or the checking part the system is down in."

"Axonius has positively impacted my organization significantly, as we discover thousands upon thousands of devices that don't have EDR tools, which means they are not protected."

More Axonius pros

"The Qualys Agent is most valuable for getting insight into what is happening on what device with all its metadata."

"The platform's most valuable features include its robust vulnerability detection capabilities and automated remediation workflows."

"The top one for me is that the vulnerabilities are kept up to date."

"Overall, the solution is highly rated because of its simplicity and efficiency."

"I would recommend Qualys because it's very easy to use."

"The features that are most valuable are the identification, scan features, and the identification of vulnerabilities."

"Detects new hosts along with vulnerabilities."

"It is quite easy to implement."

More Qualys Exposure Management pros

Cons

"Axonius can improve on delivering compliance-related features."

"We can have fetch cycle issues."

"Axonius needs to improve by having the ability to ingest IoT data, as customers are requesting IoT data which we are currently unable to provide."

"I think Axonius can be improved with more integration with different third-party tools, so we can identify which tools are missing and what more we can do with these endpoint devices floating around on our network."

"For us, the product's deployment phase was a little challenging because we had to deal with other departments and business units."

"Adding more detailed descriptions or YouTube videos about specific features would help improve the application."

"Axonius could improve by increasing their integrations with more technology vendors."

"For Axonius, I would suggest supporting more ticketing platforms and enhancing API integration directly into the platform rather than just the connector. This would allow for better integration from different systems, possibly into workflows, which I think is currently lacking."

More Axonius cons

"This solution could be improved by extending the agent capabilities to different operating systems including Mac and Linux. We would also like the capability to easily check for vulnerability in assets in the IOTs."

"The solution is a bit expensive if you do not have access to discounts."

"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."

"It's too early for me to say if there is any room for improvement since we're in the first couple of months of using this solution."

"I have used the support from Qualys Container Security and they could improve their knowledge."

"The user interface (UI) is quite complicated."

"Integration could be better. When you think about scanning, it's not used just with this product alone but with other Qualys products. If you think about the bundle, the product itself is good. But integration with other products and packages has space for improvement. They should also offer a better price for bundles."

"The response time of technical support takes a while."

More Qualys Exposure Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Axonius is quite a bit cheaper compared to other solutions."

"We are on a subscription model with them."

"An annual license for a single scanner costs around $3,000."

"Qualys is cheaper and more affordable than other solutions."

"Qualys VM is quite expensive. It's a subscription-based license, and it's yearly. Right now, it's open for me, and I don't have any limitations or caps on the licenses. They are seeing if the product is viable for 4500 users. I can add as much as I want, and at the end of the subscription, they'll let me know how many licenses were actually used and bill me accordingly. On a scale from one to five, I would give their pricing a three. It's still expensive."

"There are no additional fees in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Qualys VM is better suited for medium to large companies because the price can be too much for smaller customers."

"The solution is reasonably priced for the value it provides."

"In Nigerian Naira, we spend about roughly four to five million to use this solution and this is expensive compared to solutions like Nessus."

"There is a license for the use of this solution. We pay annually instead of monthly to receive a better discount on the price."

More Qualys Exposure Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,743 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	75

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axonius?

For pricing, I would rate it as a 7, where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axonius?

Axonius needs to improve by having the ability to ingest IoT data, as customers are requesting IoT data which we are currently unable to provide. Axonius has several capabilities that could be impr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axonius?

My main use case for Axonius is as a sysadmin. I use Axonius to ingest data from security tools, provide access to users, create dashboards, and provide reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys VMDR?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that we can consider both time and money saved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys VMDR?

I haven't explored Qualys VMDR's vulnerability lifecycle automation yet. One of my analysts mentioned that queries lack grouping operators in Qualys VMDR. From my experience, I would appreciate imp...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Qualys VMDR?

I have some understanding about PeerSpot, and I have visited the website. PeerSpot is similar to TrustRadius. It takes reviews from customers or end users who are using the tools and technologies i...

See all answers

Comparisons

Armis vs Axonius

Compared 13% of the time

JupiterOne vs Axonius

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

OctoXLabs vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

Armis Centrix for Asset Management and Security vs Axonius

Compared 7% of the time

More Axonius Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Qualys Exposure Management

Compared 4% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Qualys Exposure Management

Compared 3% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Qualys Exposure Management

Compared 3% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Qualys Exposure Management

Compared 3% of the time

Wiz vs Qualys Exposure Management

Compared 2% of the time

More Qualys Exposure Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Axonius

October 2026

Download Axonius product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys Exposure Management

October 2026

Download Qualys Exposure Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Qualys VM, QualysGuard VM, Qualys Asset Inventory, Qualys Container Security

Overview

Axonius offers robust asset management, enhancing network visibility by consolidating data from various devices. It excels in automatic device categorization for up-to-date inventories, crucial for compliance and risk assessments. Key features include automated policy enforcement and comprehensive reporting tools, which streamline workflows and improve organizational productivity and security compliance. Integrations with other IT tools further enhance its efficiency.

Axonius

Qualys VMDR is a comprehensive cybersecurity tool offering vulnerability management, patch management, and continuous monitoring with real-time asset discovery. It delivers scalable, cloud-based solutions that enhance security operations without additional infrastructure.

Qualys VMDR provides a robust platform for enterprise security, integrating vulnerability management, compliance, and asset inventory for full visibility across cloud and on-premises environments. It features a comprehensive dashboard with threat intelligence-driven prioritization and remediation capabilities. Users benefit from accurate assessments via agent-based scanning and appreciate the intuitive, customizable scanning and reporting interface. However, there's room for improvement in false positive reduction, UI simplification, and integration capabilities, along with enhancements in asset management for large-scale deployments and the vulnerability database. Enhancing technical support speed, patch management, compliance standards, and inter-module navigation would further enrich user experience.

What are the key features of Qualys VMDR?

Vulnerability Management: Identifies and manages security vulnerabilities across environments.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated with the latest patches.
Continuous Monitoring: Offers real-time insights into security posture.
Asset Discovery: Provides up-to-date asset inventory and visibility.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances prioritization and remediation processes.
Customizable Dashboard: Facilitates easier scanning and reporting through an intuitive interface.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating Qualys VMDR?

Scalability: Cloud-based deployment offers easy, cost-effective expansion.
Accurate Assessment: Agent-based scanning keeps security data current.
Enhanced Security Operations: Comprehensive features streamline vulnerability management.
Advanced Reporting: Facilitates detailed insights for better security decision-making.

Qualys VMDR is widely used in industries needing stringent security and compliance measures, offering comprehensive vulnerability and compliance management. It is deployed to secure web applications, servers, and crucial assets, supporting a wide range of sectors by ensuring policy adherence and vulnerability tracking through its powerful cloud platform.

Qualys

Sample Customers

Extreme Engineering Solutions, AppsFlyer, Landmark Health, Natera

Agrokor Group, American Specialty Health, American State Bank, Arval, Life:), Axway, Bank of the West, Blueport Commerce, BSkyB, Brinks, CaixaBank, Cartagena, Catholic Health System, CEC Bank, Cegedim, CIGNA, Clickability, Colby-Sawyer College, Commercial Bank of Dubai, University of Utah, eBay Inc., ING Singapore, National Theatre, OTP Bank, Sodexo, WebEx

Buyer's Guide

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Armis, Axonius and others in Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,743 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.