• Home
  • AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] vs. CA NetMaster File Transfer Management

AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] vs CA NetMaster File Transfer Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] and CA NetMaster File Transfer Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Improved organizational collaboration but needs to enhance UI
The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization.
Use CA NetMaster File Transfer Management?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's $249 per month per instance. It's not great; it's pretty pricey. We've got multiple users on that one instance. If we had to build it by hand, we would win on cost there, but obviously, there is effort and time. In terms of the additional costs, they do have some specific pricing, but for our use case, we don't end up going over $249. They do specify in their pricing what they're charging for."

    • More AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about AWS Transfer for SFTP?
    Top Answer:The solution has helped with collaboration in our organization.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with AWS Transfer for SFTP?
    Top Answer:The tool's UI should be pretty easy and straightforward. I would also like to see a simple audit report of the SFTP guest account that shows the amount of data transfers and security kind enabled.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for AWS Transfer for SFTP?
    Top Answer:We have integrations with third-party systems that unfortunately make use of a very old-school, file-based protocol. Instead of an API or HTTP-based protocol where you make a request to an endpoint… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    39th
    out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    40
    Comparisons
    24
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Broadcom
    Overview

    AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol.

    CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

    Sample Customers
    Myriota, FINRA, Celgene, Kontor New Media, Belong, ThinkCX, BluTV
    Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company8%
    Government7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 3 reviews while CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is ranked 39th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] is rated 8.0, while CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] writes "Always works, handles all types of load, and allows us to have S3 files as storage". On the other hand, AWS Transfer for SFTP [EOL] is most compared with IBM Sterling File Gateway, MOVEit, Kiteworks, CA XCOM Data Transport and Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, whereas CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is most compared with .

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.