Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS CodePipeline vs CloudBees comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS CodePipeline optimizes development efficiency and resources, enhancing monitoring with expected financial returns similar to AWS Batch.
Sentiment score
7.5
CloudBees licensing offers robust ROI with security, support, and automation, enhancing efficiency and trust in production environments.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
AWS CodePipeline support receives mixed reviews, with faster assistance in business plans; documentation helps some manage independently.
Sentiment score
6.9
CloudBees support gets mixed reviews, often praised for responsiveness but criticized for frequent issues and plugin upgrade suggestions.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS CodePipeline is scalable and flexible, efficiently managing deployments across languages with high user satisfaction, despite Linux limitations.
Sentiment score
7.8
CloudBees efficiently supports scalable multi-environment operations, integrating with architectures like Kubernetes, despite notable resource consumption.
AWS CodePipeline is good for scalability, and I rate it as nine out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
AWS CodePipeline is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues if correctly configured, aligning well with CI/CD expectations.
Sentiment score
6.6
CloudBees is generally stable but can encounter issues during upgrades, plugin compatibility, and in complex server environments.
I rate the stability of AWS CodePipeline as a ten out of ten because I have not experienced any issues with it.
 

Room For Improvement

AWS CodePipeline users want lower costs, faster builds, enhanced multi-cloud support, better integrations, UI, customization, and improved technical documentation.
Users seek CloudBees improvements in speed, integration, GUI, plugins, authentication, reliability, AI integration, and standardized templates.
The documentation for AWS CodePipeline is lacking and makes it difficult to find information due to its complexity.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find AWS CodePipeline cost-effective and flexible, with monthly costs typically under $5 per pipeline.
Enterprises favor CloudBees for its core product and security features, accepting high costs due to substantial benefits.
 

Valuable Features

AWS CodePipeline excels in integration, flexibility, cost-efficiency, security, and simplifies transitions with robust deployment and management tools.
CloudBees enhances CI/CD efficiency with scalability, tool integration, advanced security, cloud support, and seamless Jenkins management.
It allows me to test changes in an isolated environment before deploying them to the entire user base.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline
Ranking in Build Automation
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
CloudBees
Ranking in Build Automation
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Configuration Management (11th), Value Stream Management Software (3rd), DevSecOps (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 5.6%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CloudBees is 1.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty - PeerSpot reviewer
A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture
Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.
YashBrahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes
Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Legal Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?
Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?
AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.
What needs improvement with CloudBees?
There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

CodePipeline
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. CloudBees and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.