We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product provides self-healing features."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"AWS Auto Scaling is cost-effective and very useful for businesses."
"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."
"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."
"The tool's stability could be improved."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The product’s security features need improvement."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"The solution must improve automation."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"It could be cheaper."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."
"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 27th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) writes "Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is most compared with Azure Monitor. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
