Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

Auvik and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Auvik is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while ManageEngine is ranked #85. Auvik holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 99% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 216 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

18,261 Views
12,417 Comparison Views

99% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

3,027 Views
1,756 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and Auvik Network Management are competing network management solutions. Auvik seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features that justify its cost.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 offers integrated network, server, and application monitoring, providing a comprehensive IT management approach. It supports multivendor environments, customized dashboards, and SLA monitoring. Auvik focuses on automated network discovery, features real-time network mapping, and offers traffic analysis through NetFlow. ANM's advanced automation and network documentation provide feature advantages.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could improve its automation capabilities, offer more intuitive user interfaces, and enhance the speed of deployment. Auvik could expand its support for non-networking devices, enhance its alerting system, and improve scalability options for larger organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 requires more time for deployment due to its comprehensive set of capabilities and complex setup. Its support documentation is detailed but less accessible. Auvik offers a simple, cloud-based deployment model, speeding up integration, and provides strong customer support with clearer implementation guidance.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 is noted for its reasonable initial costs, supporting adoption in smaller organizations. Auvik, despite its higher upfront cost, delivers greater long-term ROI through reduced network management time and proactive monitoring features, making it a worthwhile investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

4th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

216

Ranking in other categories

Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

85th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

69th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Asset Management (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	1.3%
ManageEngine IT360	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AmanThakkar

Software Engineer at Titanslab Inc.

Network automation has reduced troubleshooting time and supports faster issue resolution

The biggest and best feature I have experienced with Auvik Network Management (ANM) is automatic network discovery, along with features such as topology map, instant alerts, real-time monitoring, easy remote access, and simple dashboards. Among those features, I find automatic network discovery to be the most useful because it gives a clear picture of the entire network without having to create manual diagrams. It is very easy to use Auvik Network Management (ANM), so even a new team member can quickly understand the network because everything is displayed in a very clear way. Auvik Network Management (ANM) has positively impacted our organization by reducing troubleshooting time, improving network visibility, providing a very clear picture, and helping us support multiple client networks and environments very efficiently. We have noticed a 35 to 40% improvement in troubleshooting speed, less manual work in documenting any network system, faster responses to network issues, and better uptime with the client networks.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All of the features are valuable, but the ability to remote into anything, whether it's a terminal or a browser, is really big for us. It makes things a lot easier day-to-day."

"The impact of Auvik Network Management on reducing business disruptions related to network issues is significant."

"The most valuable features of Auvik are the alerting and monitoring; those functions mean it easily more than pays for itself."

"We saw several warnings on several of our older switches. We would not have seen this stuff unless we had gone into these switches and read through these logs on our own, but Auvik was holding this data and giving us these warnings so that we could go in and sort out what was wrong."

"The most valuable feature of Auvik is the comprehensive network management it provides."

"The ability to have visibility on a network to see the traffic and the ability to see if devices are misconfigured and if something changes in that configuration, are most valuable."

"My favorite feature so far is the alerts section. We've got our main company at the top, and then all of our customers are underneath that. We can either filter by a single customer or one of their sites specifically, or look at it from the top down and see the whole picture. It's an easy way for me to be able to have a high-level overview. I can see the status of all of our sites simultaneously without having to really dig in and get super granular, unless I want to."

"The most valuable feature is the notification that alerts us to an offline server, whether the server is rebooting, resetting, or if we have network issues with the internet service provider."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

"The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training."

"I would suggest you use this product as it's easy for administration, and is based on distributed model support."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"The technical support is good."

"All I know is that when it comes to managing the active directory, ManageEngine is something I consider to be the best."

"Customer Service: Absolutely fantastic."

"The primary use case of this solution is to manage and to protect the web servers, the mail server, and the website in my company."

Cons

"It would be useful if network monitoring tools could differentiate between traffic on individual physical ports and traffic on logical interfaces like LAGs or bonded interfaces. Ideally, the tool would also recognize and remove duplicate traffic counts within the overall flow metrics."

"They can maybe provide some more best practices or guidance around how large a network should be. They can provide some cutoff points, such as, if you have 30 network devices, you might want to chunk that into a smaller subset or site. They can help you better plan and design how to create your Auvik sites, especially if you have a large environment."

"The mapping automatically finds all the interfaces but tags some of them incorrectly. For instance, if it can't find how a CPU interface is connected, it will use the MAC address last seen on the router and sometimes attribute cloud-connected devices to the route, but it's not actually there. That's not a true connection."

"Auvik could have better compatibility with more devices."

"Navigating around the map on more complex networks is pretty painful if you're showing endpoints. I know there are filters to knock it down, but sometimes that's not enough. It handles like 'early-90s Java.'"

"I found the search feature somewhat frustrating. For example, let's say I'm searching for an IP address. Even though this thing exists, it doesn't do a good job of showing it to me."

"The NetFlow app can be a bit compressed and difficult to customize for better readability."

"More capabilities in terms of default OIDs, so we can leverage more of the information from SNMP would be good to see."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"This is because of the lack of available technical knowledge in terms of competence and maximizing the power of the product."

"The GUI could be improved."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"ManageEngine needs to fix the downtime scheduler for SNMP monitored devices. Alarms are still generated for the devices placed into scheduled maintenance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost for all the devices that we were billed at in my last job was about $2500 annually. It wasn't much. It has the most reasonable pricing as compared to any product out there. I can't complain. It is amazing. It allows me to bundle inside the package what I charge customers per user per month. I don't charge them per device anymore. That's not how we do things in the industry. It is per user per month. The way Auvik is charging us allows me to do it. For example, if they charge $250 for a certain number of seats, I'm just going to write the costs onto per user per month. I have a few leftover licenses to use, which allows me to go out and make some more sales and give some freebies at some shows. So, it makes me very flexible. I am very happy with it. It is billed by network devices. You could choose which billable device you want. What is really nice is that if you don't want one switch to be billable and the other one to be billable, you can do that. You just won't have the features that the billable switch has, which isn't horrible. Sometimes, you don't need that. What I'm really happy about is that Auvik doesn't force things on you and doesn't say, "You have to have all of this," and that's a great business model."

"The pricing is reasonable, neither exceptionally cheap nor excessively expensive—it aligns well with what I anticipated."

"I find Auvik's pricing to be a good value for the features offered."

"I don't know how much the solution costs, but the fact that we've moved almost all of our customers over to it means it must be worth the value. Our platforms are costly, but we switched to Auvik, so the company must see it as cost-effective."

"The pricing is fair; it's just the right price for what the solution provides."

"Their licensing model is basically per managed device. You pay X amount per managed device, and managed devices are limited to switches, routers, firewalls, and wireless LAN controllers. So, the only things that we pay for are our switches, routers, firewalls, and wireless LAN controllers, but there are orders of magnitude more devices that Auvik manages that we don't pay for. It also manages servers, workstations, and phones. Auvik will gather KPIs from anything that is connected to the network if it can be managed via a standard like SNMP or WMI. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is by device. We have 75 devices, which is a little more than we really need. With school and volume discounts, it is still a little over $16,000 annually. Our WiFi access points are not being billed, but all our switches and routers are."

"Auvik is expensive, but given how much we use it and how many hours it is saving over the year, it is justified."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

32%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	155
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

I am from the technical department, so the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspects have been managed by the management.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) can be improved with better reporting options. While there are options for reporting, having more clarity would be helpful, along with more advanced analytics and mor...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

Our main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is to monitor and manage the client networks, helping us to track the network devices and identify issues quickly to monitor the performance and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 3% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Zabbix vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 8% of the time

Netreo vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 6% of the time

USU Valuemation vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 6% of the time

ServiceNow vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 5% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

August 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

IT360

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

ManageEngine IT360 is a comprehensive tool crafted for IT management, offering a robust framework to monitor and manage network infrastructure efficiently.

Designed for IT professionals, ManageEngine IT360 integrates IT management and network monitoring, offering seamless oversight of an organization's entire IT framework. Users gain insights into performance, data flow, and bottlenecks, assisting in maintaining optimal infrastructure efficiency. It provides actionable intelligence to support informed decision-making.

What are the key features of ManageEngine IT360?

Comprehensive Network Monitoring: Provides detailed metrics for tracking and maintaining network performance.
Fault Management: Quickly identifies issues for prompt resolution, minimizing downtime.
Performance Management: Continuously evaluates system performance to ensure IT assets are operating as expected.
Help Desk Integration: Facilitates streamlined support processes through seamless module integration.
Server Monitoring: Delivers insights into server health and performance metrics, aiding in proactive management.

What benefits and ROI should be considered when evaluating ManageEngine IT360?

Cost Efficiency: Provides comprehensive management tools reducing the need for multiple software investments.
Productivity Enhancement: Minimizes downtime improving productivity across IT teams.
Improved Decision Making: Offers real-time data aiding strategic infrastructure planning.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing IT requirements, ensuring long-term solution viability.

ManageEngine IT360 finds its application across industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. In finance, it enhances data security and network reliability, critical for transactional integrity. Healthcare sectors use it to ensure system uptime crucial for patient management systems. Manufacturing sectors rely on it for uninterrupted operations, ensuring system efficiencies align with production demands.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360

August 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.