Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automation Anywhere vs QAD Process Intelligence comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere
Ranking in Process Mining
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
560
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (3rd), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (3rd), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (3rd), Agentic Automation (2nd)
QAD Process Intelligence
Ranking in Process Mining
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 18.5%, down from 25.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QAD Process Intelligence is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

Vatsal Mehta - PeerSpot reviewer
Accommodates diverse use cases and effectively meets customer requirements
AI agents need further improvements. AI agent technology in agentic process automation is still evolving. We have only scratched the surface, and there are many potential use cases yet to be explored. As technology advances, I believe it will enable us to implement more comprehensive automation solutions. Document Automation has issues related to speed. When I compare Document Automation with IQ Bot, IQ Bot is faster than Document Automation. My understanding is that they are still evolving Document Automation, and this issue of slowness will be resolved in the upcoming .35 version, so we are good with that. They are working on signature identification and validations for handwritten documents. Currently, we are able to extract data out of scanned but digital images, but there is still scope for improvement for handwritten documents.
Use QAD Process Intelligence?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is very good in certain situations but lacks in others. For me, it's more the team tha...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applications that AA has limitations for, such as the Oracle. For web-based applicatio...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics
1. AP Moller Maersk 2. ABB 3. Accenture 4. Adidas 5. Aetna 6. Airbus 7. AIG 8. Allianz 9. Amazon 10. American Express 11. AmerisourceBergen 12. Amgen 13. AnheuserBusch InBev 14. Apple 15. AstraZeneca 16. ATT 17. Autoliv 18. Bayer 19. Bechtel 20. BHP Billiton 21. Boeing 22. BNP Paribas 23. Cisco Systems 24. Coca-Cola 25. Comcast 26. ConocoPhillips 27. Constellation Brands 28. Danone 29. Dell 30. Deutsche Bank 31. Dominion Energy 32. EON
Find out what your peers are saying about Automation Anywhere, Microsoft, Celonis and others in Process Mining. Updated: April 2025.
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.