No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AuraQuantic vs Pipefy comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
AuraQuantic enhances efficiency, speeds up tasks, optimizes resources, and boosts productivity and ROI through customization and automation.
Sentiment score
5.5
Pipefy boosts team efficiency through automation, reducing manual tasks, saving time and money, and optimizing workflows in the commercial sector.
With the entire service being constantly evaluated and with us having a trace of all this operational side, we are able to measure the quality of the service, how much each of the employees worked.
Head de Operações
In terms of money and time saved, Pipefy is a great time saver overall, reflecting in analysts handling additional projects beyond ticket management.
Finance Analyst at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The Kanban model makes it very technological, leading to increased productivity compared to something done manually, such as sending quotations by email.
Analista de Compras Junior at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
AuraQuantic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable support team that assists with implementation and troubleshooting.
Sentiment score
4.7
Pipefy's customer service is efficient and responsive, though some users face delays and prefer easier contact options.
I would rate customer support on a scale from one to ten as ten.
Analista de Negócios at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Whenever I needed support, and there were many times I needed it, they were extremely attentive and quick in their service.
PMO Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
This is cumbersome, and I find direct customer service with Pipefy to be lacking.
Finance Analyst at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
AuraQuantic is highly scalable, accommodating both easy starts and rapid growth, making it ideal for large clients and expanding needs.
Sentiment score
5.9
Pipefy excels in scalability, handling growth efficiently and reliably, while offering user-friendly customization to improve processes for all sizes.
Pipefy's scalability handles the volume of requests very well, and when new demands arise, it does not freeze or lag.
Analista de Compras Junior at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
It is a proportional increase in output without a proportional increase in headcount.
Field Office Coordinator at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Since we can track the whole process, its scalability is very good because we can analyze the entire macro.
Head de Operações
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
AuraQuantic is highly stable, performs excellently on Microsoft Azure, and has no reported issues, earning a ten out of ten.
Sentiment score
7.8
Pipefy is generally stable and reliable, with occasional downtime and good security, making it a dependable choice.
I don't remember any moment when something had an error or when something froze my operation.
Unknown at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
They always notify about any maintenance and also inform what the progress is when there is a problem.
PMO Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I would rate its stability at approximately 80 percent reliability with 20 percent downtime.
Analista de monitoramento at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

AuraQuantic needs better system integration, extensive documentation, intuitive training, easier customization, and more responsive technical support.
Pipefy needs better support, pricing flexibility, enhanced integrations, improved mobile app, and refined workflows for user satisfaction.
I believe this part could be improved because this kind of error should not happen while someone is using Pipefy.
Analista de Compras Junior at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Sometimes the person who is buying this platform is not going to use all these functions. So there could be smaller, intermediate plans so you can use Pipefy up to a specific point, and then you would have lower costs.
Head de Operações
Pipefy should alert users when they are creating conflicting rules.
business analyst at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

AuraQuantic provides scalable, transparent pricing with various plans based on deployment options, usage requirements, and number of users.
Enterprise buyers consider Pipefy's pricing high yet favorable, appreciating its value, comprehensive packages, and competitive billing system.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been cost-effective.
Software Firmware Engineer at Kohler Company
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing is that it was expensive.
Head de Operações
I also didn't have access to the prices, but I know that we had several users and, given what the platform delivers, it was a fair price.
Analista de Negócios at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

AuraQuantic is a user-friendly, zero-code platform for automating and optimizing processes with quick implementation and reliable support.
Pipefy enhances productivity and workflow visibility with automation, AI optimization, intuitive interface, and low-code flexibility for easy customization.
A specific outcome since using Pipefy is that we have reduced lead time significantly.
Lean 6 Sigma Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
In my opinion, some of the best features Pipefy offers are workflow customizations with low-code configuration, automation of repetitive tasks and approvals, an easy-to-use and intuitive interface, visibility and tracking across teams and processes, integration capabilities with other tools, centralized process management, notifications, and SLA tracking.
Sre at Atlas Technologies
Pipefy has had a positive impact on my organization by helping the collections team convert invoices that were overdue into paid invoices and, consequently, cash for the company.
Software Developer at a legal firm with 1-10 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic
Ranking in Process Automation
18th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (17th), Low-Code Development Platforms (21st), No-Code Development Platforms (9th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (14th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (22nd)
Pipefy
Ranking in Process Automation
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Agentic Automation (5th), AI Agent Builders (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pipefy is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Pipefy0.5%
AuraQuantic1.4%
Other98.1%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer at Banco de Guatemala
Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable
It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.
Tamires dos Santos Andrade - PeerSpot reviewer
PMO Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Workflow automation has transformed portfolio control and centralizes cross‑department requests
Something I would like to see improved in Pipefy is the dashboards. They are good, but they are a little limited. This point is important, and I would also like to see a bit more clarity in the use of AI tokens. Pipefy already offers connection and artificial intelligence tools that help you with your forms and make the process much more intuitive, but it is still a bit obscure regarding consumption, how that consumption occurs, and how to build this in a way that is relatively economical. Another important thing is related to cost. Pipefy's license cost is a high cost compared to other players in the market, but so far it has been worth it. Another thing I would suggest is if they had a white-label option where we could put a bit more of the company's identity. Pipefy already is white label, but the customization options are a little more limited. Turning that into a more attractive page would be nice for some companies so that we can incorporate it into our portals.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Construction Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
23%
Construction Company
16%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise13
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Pipefy?
I have been making adjustments daily. At this specific moment, leadership is still looking for ways to optimize it much more, of course, but I do not feel a lack of features because I have everythi...
What is your primary use case for Pipefy?
At KPMG, I used Pipefy mainly for handling support and requests. I handled job and project tickets for partners and managers, taking care of all the administrative work, reputational and financial ...
What advice do you have for others considering Pipefy?
The control aspect of Pipefy for leadership also helps so that we do not get lost, because since there is a very high workload, this helps us have better organization. The automation and control of...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
1. Accenture 2. Coca-Cola 3. Santander 4. IBM 5. Unilever 6. Siemens 7. Johnson & Johnson 8. Deloitte 9. PwC 10. Nestle 11. General Electric 12. Microsoft 13. Oracle 14. Amazon 15. Facebook 16. Google 17. Apple 18. Uber 19. Airbnb 20. Netflix 21. Adobe 22. Salesforce 23. Cisco 24. Intel 25. HP 26. Samsung 27. Sony 28. Toyota 29. Volkswagen 30. BMW 31. Mercedes-Benz 32. Audi
Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Pipefy and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.