AttackIQ vs CyCognito comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AttackIQ Logo
1,973 views|1,309 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
CyCognito Logo
318 views|218 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AttackIQ and CyCognito based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS).
To learn more, read our detailed Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
NOUBOUM NOUBI BORIS HERMAN
Use CyCognito?
Ranking
Views
1,973
Comparisons
1,309
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
318
Comparisons
218
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Pentera logo
Compared 25% of the time.
Picus Security logo
Compared 17% of the time.
SafeBreach logo
Compared 16% of the time.
Cymulate logo
Compared 16% of the time.
XM Cyber logo
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn More
CyCognito
Video Not Available
Overview

The AttackIQ platform enables continuous validation that your security controls, processes and people are working as intended and delivering ROI. It seamlessly integrates into any existing network, delivering immediate visibility into your security program so you can uncover gaps in coverage, identify misconfigurations, and quickly prioritize remediation efforts.

Legacy security testing approaches may help security teams find and remediate risks on-premises and directly managed infrastructure. But, they are no match for the rapidly expanding attack surface caused by modern, highly distributed IT ecosystems.

CyCognito was founded by veterans of national intelligence agencies who understand how attackers exploit blind spots, and who recognized the need for a radical new approach to threat assessment. Our mission is to build the next-generation security risk assessment product category: solutions that autonomously discover, enumerate, and prioritize each organization’s security risks based upon a global analysis of all external attack surfaces and attack vectors that a real attacker would likely exploit.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
UTA, BERTELSMANN, WIPRO
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Computer Software Company13%
Comms Service Provider8%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company10%
Government7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise61%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise63%
Buyer's Guide
Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AttackIQ is ranked 7th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while CyCognito is ranked 11th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). AttackIQ is rated 7.0, while CyCognito is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AttackIQ writes "Overall, a good user experience and works well but is hard to set up". On the other hand, AttackIQ is most compared with Pentera, Picus Security, SafeBreach, Cymulate and XM Cyber, whereas CyCognito is most compared with Censys Attack Surface Management, Cortex Xpanse, IBM Security Randori Recon, Cymulate and Pentera.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.