Attackflow vs Fortify Software Security Center comparison

Attackflow and OpenText are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Attackflow is ranked #72, while OpenText is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. Attackflow holds a 0.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution.

Attackflow

38 Views
38 Comparison Views

Fortify Software Security C...

Read 6 Fortify Software Security Center reviews

550 Views
490 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Attackflow

Fortify Software Security C...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Attackflow and Fortify Software Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,543 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Attackflow

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

72nd

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Fortify Software Security C...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Attackflow is 0.0%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Use Attackflow?

Share your opinion

Jonathan Steyn

Principal Technical Consultant at EOH

Comprehensive vulnerability analysis and customization features with decent pricing

Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances. WebInspect supports a number of APIs and web endpoints. I find its feature of macro recording allows for testing vulnerabilities during multi-factor authentication sessions very valuable. I appreciate the ability to further analyze data with tools like Audit Workbench.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus Software Security Center?

You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

In the beginning, it was difficult for me to verify that our usage of Fortify Software Security Center corresponded to the license and criteria. Now, we have negotiated a number of details to respe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?

I would like the false positive issue to diminish. I have experienced a lot of false positives, but I think this is due to using an older version. I hope the new version will resolve my problem.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 49% of the time

Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 39% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

July 2025

Download Attackflow product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

July 2025

Download Fortify Software Security Center product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect

Overview

Attackflow is a user-friendly platform that helps identify and mitigate potential security threats. It analyzes and protects systems from various attacks, such as malware, phishing, and unauthorized access. With comprehensive threat detection capabilities and an efficient incident response system, Attackflow allows users to proactively protect their systems. Its intuitive interface makes it easy to navigate and understand the security status of their systems.

Attackflow

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.