No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Arize AI vs Rapid7 InsightAppSec comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Arize AI
Ranking in AI Observability
16th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Model Monitoring (1st)
Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Ranking in AI Observability
21st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the AI Observability category, the mindshare of Arize AI is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightAppSec is 0.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Arize AI0.8%
Rapid7 InsightAppSec0.6%
Other98.6%
AI Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Akashkhurana Hirana - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer 2 at Porch
Detailed observability has transformed agent monitoring and now detects hallucinations quickly
I think everything is there to be true. I do not think there is a scope for improvement in Arize AI. Everything is there. It has a steep learning curve. It takes time to see how Arize works. It is not a very basic thing where anyone can go and start doing it because it takes time. There is a steep learning curve for Arize AI. Because there are so many things in the model or in an agent, it takes time. It is not very easy to use, it takes time. It has a lot of advantages, but it takes time to learn how Arize works. As I mentioned earlier, it has a steep learning curve. It takes time to learn Arize AI, it takes time to configure, it takes time to create dashboards and monitors, and it takes time to understand the UI and determine what can I find where. It takes time to do all of that. It has a steep learning curve.
Shritam Bhowmick - PeerSpot reviewer
Vulnerability Management Lead at garrett
Provides reliable applications security but needs better integration options
There are areas for improvements regarding false positives. Integration capabilities are lacking, as options for integrations with other tools such as SNOW, Jira, or other integration tools are not sufficient in Rapid7 InsightAppSec. The user interface sometimes has glitches, which may prevent appropriate results during navigation, and even when we get appropriate results, it can be impossible to export them to CSV records or download files. Regarding scalability, Rapid7 InsightAppSec is not a scalable solution for our industry due to limited integration capabilities. Rapid7 relies on another tool called InsightConnect, which requires additional investment, detracting from scalability. Another area that needs improvement is the integration of AI capabilities into the platform. Both Rapid7 InsightAppSec and InsightVM need to advance in that area. In terms of behavioral and pattern recognition, identifying complex attacks such as SQL, blind SQL, JSON, and LDAP injections often results in 94% false positives. This necessitates improvement in their behavioral-based analytics feature.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our timely actions, aided by Arize AI, have allowed us to report results with over 99% accuracy, proving it quite useful."
"One of the major improvements is that prior to using Arize AI, our agent was hallucinating and we were not aware of when it hallucinates or we had a problem in debugging."
"Arize AI, with its major features similar to those platforms, is a good alternative."
"Arize AI has positively impacted my organization as the answers are more accurate and agent quality has improved dramatically."
"Arize AI has positively impacted my organization by reducing most of our manual work, shifting us to complete automation, reducing working hours, and allowing us to focus more on accuracy with less chance of mistakes."
"Arize AI has made leadership more comfortable with introducing AI features by providing better visibility into failures and reducing unexpected issues in production."
"I would rate the technical support from Rapid7 a ten, indicating high-quality support."
"If a company needs an effective product for web scanning, I can recommend this product."
"The automatic automation of the automated authorization to the SCANNET environment is valuable."
"For our needs, Rapid7 was the ideal go-to tool."
"This is a product that I recommend and my advice for anybody who is interested in trying it, there is a free 60-day trial period where they will fix your problems without any payment."
"The solution is stable."
"Dynamic application security scanning provides predefined templates and supports customization. The ability to scan external and internal applications, including on-premises ones, is precious. Additionally, it is a cloud platform, so we don't need to deploy servers or resources. This makes it time-efficient and cost-effective."
"Relatively speaking, InsightAppSec is good compared to Insight VM."
 

Cons

"It has a steep learning curve."
"More end-to-end architecture examples would be beneficial as current technical documentation is solid, but more practical examples are desired."
"The evaluation workflow lacks depth in comparison to competitors, which generally rely on traditional ML frameworks."
"I think we can improve its interface."
"Arize AI can add more functions."
"We'd like to see integrations with WAF solutions."
"The dynamic scanning feature has simplified and improved the security testing process. I suggest adding a SaaS feature to the solution to support scanning SaaS applications, making it more comprehensive. It would be beneficial if the solution could also scan mobile applications. It only scans web applications and should also cover mobile applications, including firmware recommendations."
"The interface should be a little bit easier to manage. Sometimes, the logic that they use is kind of strange."
"They should add more features. I would like to see them do a little more on static analysis and also interactivity analysis. Currently, it does very basic static analysis. It could do a little more static analysis, which is something that would help. A lot more interactivity analysis should also be there. It should basically look at security during interactivity."
"The performance can be improved."
"The reporting is definitely an aspect of the solution that's in need of some work. We found that we'd try to use widgets, but often getting them to work for us wasn't very clear. They need to be more user friendly or offer better instructions."
"Currently, InsightAppSec lacks similar functionality. Customers must wait for remediation during the developers' preparation of a new version."
"The reporting is definitely an aspect of the solution that's in need of some work."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"They offer a good price, but I don't remember its cost. It is fair as compared to the competition. We have opted for project-based licensing, not user-based. We can add any number of users. That doesn't matter. It is worth the money."
"Rapid7 InsightAppSec is cheap."
"I'm not sure how much it costs exactly, but I know it's expensive."
"The price of this product is very cheap."
"Its price is competitive. It is not expensive."
"I rate Rapid7 InsightAppSec’s pricing an eight out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Observability solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
University
8%
Construction Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Construction Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arize AI?
It was more of a practical, internal estimate than a super formal KPI at first. We compared incident timelines before and after adopting Arize AI, mainly how long engineers spent identifying root c...
What needs improvement with Arize AI?
Arize AI can add more functions. I see it has monitors, evaluators, and prompt test datasets, which are good. However, I feel that other platforms can provide even more comprehensive feature sets. ...
What is your primary use case for Arize AI?
My main use case for Arize AI involves exploring alternative solutions for Langfuse and LLM platforms. I was exploring several products in the market for model evaluation and prompt testing. A spec...
What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightAppSec?
Customers sometimes experience issues with performance. One thing that I recall is that most customers often want to have reporting as per their customized dashboard. This needs to be improved beca...
What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightAppSec?
I usually recommend this solution for financial institutions. Banks and financial institutions need this solution mostly because they have to follow stringent compliance advisory requirements, so t...
What advice do you have for others considering Rapid7 InsightAppSec?
I have not heard any complaints. I do not have any recommendations because customers were initially worried about the number of scans they used to perform, and now it has been enhanced or it will s...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
InsightAppSec
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
CenterPoint Energy, CPA Australia, Hypertherm, First American Financial Corporation, Rackspace
Find out what your peers are saying about Arize AI vs. Rapid7 InsightAppSec and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.