ArcSight Analytics vs DNIF HYPERCLOUD comparison

"The most valuable feature is the log monitoring."

"ArcSight Analytics has improved our system and network policy monitoring."

"ArcSight Analytics is used to get a deeper insight and threat analysis about the network."

"The correlation engine is good."

"The solution is easy to implement."

"This solution allows us to identify connections for all users."

"Allows multiple integrations with multiple systems in a stable and flexible fashion."

"Less resource consumption in terms of memory and processing."

"The dashboard is helpful, and it creates visualizations to let staff review event data and identify patterns and anomalies."

"I like the MITRE table, a feature I saw for the first time in the same solution. There was one MITRE tactic table, which can be used to identify threats if you have all kinds of rules enabled or if you have rules for all the tactics in the MITRE table. There are 14 tables in MITRE, and those 14 tables consist of multiple columns, tactics, and techniques. It was one of the first SIEM tools I saw that had that particular MITRE table. On that basis, you can create new rules and identify existing ones. At any point, if an alert is triggered, it will try to match it to any of those MITRE tactics. I liked that creating a workbook on MITRE business was straightforward. I also like that you can search using SQL or DQL."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of EPS it can handle."

"Great for scaling productivity for log monitoring purposes."

"The beauty of the solution is that you can develop infrastructure for a data lake using open sources that are separate from the licenses."

"The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network."

"The response time on queries is super-fast."

"The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

"It's a difficult product to navigate, it's complex."

"There is a GUI, but it is not complete and lacks functionality that needs to be performed using the console."

"Inactive connections from servers, which are upgraded or downgraded within a VM, should be automatically revoked."

"Network integration is very crucial, and you need to have the knowledge to get it done."

"ArcSight's features that can be improved include anything related to its visualization capabilities and user friendliness."

"[There is] complexity in maintaining it and managing it. It's not easy to use. It requires a lot of training."

"ArcSight is not a user-friendly solution and the interface needs to be improved."

"The interactive dashboard is complicated and you need to have training in order to use it, so I think that it could be made easier to use."

"Dependency on the DNIF support team was frustrating."

"The solution's command line should be simpler so that routine commands can be used."

"The EBA could be improved."

"The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

"There are currently some issues with machine learning plug-ins."

"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful."

"I feel that DNIF needs to invest more in marketing, considering that it operates at a very competitive speed."

"I think DNIF HYPERCLOUD can implement the ability to export more than 100,000. At the moment, we can't go beyond that. So many times, if you're checking for the firewall logs and working on something related to authentication or network-related traffic, while that log count is low, the account goes beyond that. You can't restrict the logs or the amount of data you can export. It's very important for my situation. It would be better if they could increase the capacity of exports. Although there are many more types of searching in DNIF HYPERCLOUD, people still struggle to query out what they want because not everyone is good at SQL or DQL. The easiest way to query out in DNIF is using the GUI-based interface. But in the GUI interface, you can use operator calls. It gets tricky when you want to search for a specific type of event. You don't know where it will be passed and whether it will be consistent. In the initial phase, it's tough for us to use DNIF. You cannot pass every event in a stable DNIF. When we used that particular tool, we used to get those logs, but sometimes many things are not getting passed. So, we used to export the sheet or export the data into Excel and weigh the required details. In the next release, I would like them to improve the export of the columns and make the application more user-friendly. I would also like a threat-hunting feature in the next release."

"It can range between $30,000 and $40,000 USD, and can go up to $500,000 and $600,000 USD."

"In addition to the costs of standard licensing fees, there is the cost of labor for maintenance."

"This solution is expensive."

"My customers pay a yearly licensing fee for ArcSight Analytics."

"ArcSight Analytics is a bit expensive compared with other tools in terms of licensing costs, training, hardware implementation, and support."

"The monthly licensing fee is around $20,000. There aren't any costs in addition to the standard licensing fee."

"The solution requires a huge infrastructure and that is costly."

"Price-wise, the product is quite economical. I rate the solution's price as three or four on a scale of one to ten, where one is considered to be a very economically priced tool."

"The pricing is based on the log size."