AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Arcserve OneXafe comparison

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Arcserve OneXafe

Download the complete report

Helped 909,948 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve OneXafe

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

54th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (25th)

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Arcserve OneXafe is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery	0.9%
Arcserve OneXafe	0.5%
Other	98.6%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sergio Itikawa

Software Solutions Architect at SPEData

Has improved data reliability while requiring better pricing and localized support

The most valuable features of Arcserve OneXafe are improving persistent data, which I believe is very important. I use other products too, not only Arcserve OneXafe; we use TrueNAS as well. I have utilized Arcserve OneXafe's data deduplication feature. It helps my storage efficiency significantly. The product satisfaction with this product helps with storage efficiency. Regarding Arcserve OneXafe's immutable object storage helping against ransomware, the call was not clear, and I had difficulty listening to what was discussed. Arcserve OneXafe improves precision of data. I have used Arcserve OneXafe's continuous data protection. This is beneficial for operational continuity because we use it constantly. I have no objections to Arcserve OneXafe technology; I think that is very good.

Read full review

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills

Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Arcserve OneXafe are improving persistent data, which I believe is very important, and I have utilized Arcserve OneXafe's data deduplication feature, which helps my storage efficiency significantly."

"The simplicity and the ability to perform small backups are the most effective features for data protection in Arcserve OneXafe."

"Overall, the best combination of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is its near real-time replication and quick recovery testing, and this makes the service very useful in real-world scenarios."

"It provides our disaster recovery solution. It works fine in our tests."

"Some of the most valuable features of this product include its ability to manage disaster recovery effectively."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a reliable and cost-effective solution for business continuity."

"The solution's cost is reasonable."

"The most valuable aspect of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is its instant block replication feature. This allows us to perform live block verification and eliminates the need to concern ourselves with recovery point objectives. This capability is particularly advantageous for critical workloads."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery has positively impacted our organization by improving our overall resilience and reducing downtime risk."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a robust and reliable solution for disaster recovery needs."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

Cons

"The price is not the best; it is too high. It's not the best solution in terms of price, although the solution itself is good."

"Arcserve OneXafe is not used in many cases in the market that we work in."

"The price is not the best; it is too high."

"There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost."

"Sometimes, one of the servers will get behind for one reason or another, and it does not notify us when that happens."

"Because the replication is continuous and block-level, if a production server is hit by ransomware, the encrypted garbage data is often replicated to the DR site in near-real time."

"I set up a test, deleted the source, and went to fail it back, and it didn't work."

"The product could be improved by incorporating more AI-driven automation for deployment and additional security features. These enhancements would make the solution even more user-friendly and secure."

"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable, but it can be improved."

"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives. Right now, it is difficult and painful to do."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,948 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

Religious Institution

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arcserve OneXafe?

Regarding pricing and setup cost, my client said all the options are very expensive. Price is always a key point for Brazilian clients, especially in retail; first of all is the cost, so the operat...

What needs improvement with Arcserve OneXafe?

There are areas that could be improved. We use other technologies for persistent data as well. So we depend on the options that create what my clients prefer in terms of technology. Arcserve OneXaf...

What is your primary use case for Arcserve OneXafe?

The main use case for this product is that I use a backup repository for persistent data. I use it exclusively for this purpose. The industry I use this for is financial, specifically Brazilian ret...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The cost rating was assessed on a scale where 10 represented the most expensive.

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

There are areas that could be improved beyond the downtime issues mentioned, and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance several aspects of its functionality.

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

This was for the school.

ExaGrid Tiered Backup Storage vs Arcserve OneXafe

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve OneXafe

Compared 7% of the time

Scality RING vs Arcserve OneXafe

Compared 6% of the time

NetApp StorageGRID vs Arcserve OneXafe

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS) vs Arcserve OneXafe

Compared 4% of the time

More Arcserve OneXafe Competitors

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Backup and Recovery

Download Arcserve OneXafe product report

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft OneBlox

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Overview

Arcserve OneXafe is designed for data protection, encompassing backups, disaster recovery, and storage management. It ensures data accessibility with scalable options and robust performance, simplifying deployment and management.

The primary function of Arcserve OneXafe is to protect data through comprehensive backup and disaster recovery solutions. It offers seamless scalability, efficiently accommodating growing storage needs. Deduplication and compression features optimize storage costs, while its integration with cloud environments provides versatility. Users highlight its user-friendly deployment and management capabilities, although there's a noted need for improved backup and restore speed, better cloud service integration, and more streamlined setup processes. Additionally, better technical support and enhanced monitoring and reporting features are desired.

What are the key features of Arcserve OneXafe?

Deduplication and Compression: Efficient storage management by reducing data redundancy.
Scalability: Seamlessly expand storage capacity to meet increasing demands.
Data Recovery: Reliable recovery functions ensure data protection against failures.
Cloud Integration: Versatile compatibility with cloud environments.
Ease of Deployment: Simplified setup and management processes.

What benefits should users look for?

Storage Cost Optimization: Deduplication and compression features reduce storage expenses.
Reliable Data Accessibility: Scalable options ensure data remains accessible.
Efficient Management: User-friendly deployment and management streamline operations.
Versatility: Integration with cloud environments caters to diverse storage needs.

In industries like healthcare, finance, and education, Arcserve OneXafe is implemented to safeguard critical data. Hospitals rely on it for patient data protection, financial institutions use it to secure transactional records, and educational entities implement it to protect academic and administrative information. Regardless of the industry, it supports essential data protection and management needs.

Arcserve

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Sonic, Amazon, Kawasaki, Callaway, Drake University, Mazda, Thales, California Highway Patrol, Guggenheim, Bruker, NASA, Oregon.gov

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs. Arcserve OneXafe