AppSheet vs Jitterbit Vinyl comparison

Google and Jitterbit are both solutions in the No-Code Development Platforms category. Google is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while Jitterbit is ranked #16. Google holds a 5.1% mindshare in NCDP, compared to Jitterbit’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Jitterbit users who would recommend it.

AppSheet

Read 8 AppSheet reviews

639 Views
620 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,087 Views
196 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AppSheet

Jitterbit Vinyl

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

Jitterbit Vinyl and AppSheet are leaders in the no-code development platform category, competing to streamline app development and data integration. Jitterbit Vinyl has the upper hand due to its robust data mapping capabilities and favorable pricing, offering flexibility and improved ROI, particularly appealing to businesses looking to integrate multiple data sources efficiently.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl stands out with its no-code platform that connects disparate data sources without moving data, significantly reducing app development time, which is particularly beneficial for agricultural businesses. Its capacity to map data across various sources and environments is transformative. AppSheet, on the other hand, is recognized for its intuitive design and smooth integration with cloud platforms, providing easy access on mobile devices. It's intuitive design makes it user-friendly, allowing even non-developers to create apps effortlessly.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl requires enhancements in its report aesthetics and more advanced customizable options in reporting tools. Users seek improvements in the user interface and performance to increase satisfaction. AppSheet needs to expand its language support, enhance integration capabilities beyond Google accounts, and provide a clearer feature set to appeal to a wider audience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl supports flexible deployments, including public and private cloud options, with strong on-site technical support praised by users. Its responsive and competent technical support aids effective problem-solving. AppSheet is primarily deployed on the public cloud and focuses more on integrating with Google's ecosystem, showing a gap in comprehensive personalized support compared to Jitterbit Vinyl.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl's attractive pricing model allows unlimited use without user constraints, delivering significant ROI through enhanced efficiency and reduced development costs. AppSheet is considered cost-effective within the Google ecosystem, although it may become expensive for non-Google users due to its pricing structure, including higher costs for single sign-on. Jitterbit Vinyl provides clear ROI benefits through process improvements and flexibility, while AppSheet mainly offers value to Google Workspace users.

To learn more, read our detailed AppSheet vs. Jitterbit Vinyl Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AppSheet vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AppSheet

Ranking in No-Code Development Platforms

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in No-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (28th), Low-Code Development Platforms (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the No-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of AppSheet is 5.1%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

No-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Daniyal Farrakh

Program Manager at Motorola Solutions

Helpful for reporting and to do risk assessments

Within our group, I think five to six people will probably use the tool. The tool is mostly not used on an everyday basis. It is not used daily but weekly. I think the tool offers usability, and I think we can scale it. As far as our utilization is concerned, I think it is very scalable. It is very flexible. You can utilize the tool for various reasons. You can use the tool to look at your vulnerability scans and upload information. You can do risk assessments. You can do physical site assessments. I think scalability deserves five stars for sure. The scalability seems to be very easy to use and scalable and flexible.

Read full review

Larry Egan

VP Strategic Technologies at Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc

Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics

Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AppSheet is easy to set up and easy to use."

"I have found the way they structure the workflow and the fact that it a progressive application is valuable for me. This allows me to be able to build it once and use it in multiple formats."

"The solution is quite efficient, elaborate, sophisticated, fast, and easy to use."

"A feature I found most valuable in AppSheet is its intuitive UI/UX design, as that makes the platform very easy for customers to use. The solution also has a drag and drop feature that's quite good. I also found AppSheet integration with the cloud platform to be quite good."

"The tool's integration capabilities enhance our existing workflows and as far as the workflows are concerned, I think it is pretty seamless, intuitive, and interactive."

"The security of the solution is very good."

"The solution is pretty simple to implement."

"The solution has been very user friendly, easy to use, and we are able to use many applications like Excel or Google sheets."

"There are two most valuable features: one is the ability to pull data from a bunch of different places and put them together. And the second is the speed at which you can get a new app developed. So instead of waiting months for this new app to come out, if you have an internal team putting it together, you can roll it out in weeks. I've even seen days. It's incredible how fast you can make changes."

"Maintenance is very minimal. With our live production applications, they just don't break, which is great. We love that. There's zero-to-little maintenance required."

"With the Lite Integration, I didn't to have to disrupt my entire organization to do something. We haven't had to disrupt IT and the business organizations to keep them up and running."

"VINYL has given us the ability to really improve the speed with which we deploy releases and respond to the good ideas that our people have."

"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."

"You do not need to be a programmer to use it or build something in it."

"Their integrations are terrific. We've had zero issues, a 100 percent success rate with integrations. In terms of Zudy's data source connectors and API integrations, we've been really pleased. We use some software that is very common in the media business, and then we also have some custom things that we built for a variety of different use cases within our company, and we've had zero integration issues, in terms of getting data into Zudy and getting data out of it. It's been great."

"The product has reduced the time that it takes us to produce apps."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

Cons

"No improvements are required as AppSheet is quite efficient."

"They could improve by providing more language support other than English, integrate better with other databases, and provide a better UX."

"AppSheet should continue to make the tool's features easy to use, such as the ability to add additional notes or notifications."

"There needs to be an improvement in their operation vision. They need to see things more globally because at the moment they are very North-America focused. We do not always have mobile applications and the way we use them is slightly different in Africa from the way they use them in America."

"They only give a single sign-on at a very high cost."

"There are now a lot of low-code or no-code applications available on the web. AppSheet is working on that path."

"In terms of areas for improvement in AppSheet, I do many things with it, and I'm happy with its data features. The solution has good data features, and though some basic functions may not be there, AppSheet is good enough for me at the moment. I can use it in my business. I like it, and I'm still happy with it because I'm not using it intensively. I just use AppSheet for simple tasks rather than complex ones, though the solution has many use cases. In its next release, what could make the solution better would be more partners for integration, for example, integration with SAP, particularly plugins or APIs with more partners that it could integrate with. There should be an out-of-the-box feature built for integration with more partners."

"The solution needs to improve its SQL database capabilities."

"Right now it's very dependent on having an imagination to understand."

"There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit."

"If it could be prettier, it might be a bit more attractive on the business side. The most meaningful improvement might be done in some of the aesthetics of the reporting and dashboarding."

"Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard."

"Eventually, a nicer way to create certain features, like the way that we create PDFs, would help. Sometimes the way that it resizes when I have multiple windows up, could also be better. It's minor stuff though. It's edge-case stuff."

"I'd like to see the next release of VINYL have more user interface solutions to it, so that it could be a more user-friendly product on the front end for the customers that are utilizing the tool. We didn't have a solution to help automate all of our reporting in the past which identified the need to make sure that we could tap into our data sources and automate all of our reporting, which is exactly why we needed the tool."

"Version 2.3 has a good UI but we want a more customizable UI."

"During the initial rollout, the text editor wasn't 100% what we were looking for, but we were able to get the job done. After some discussions and finding ways to use different plugins during the short term, Zudy actually came back a few months later and said that they have integrated a standard product into their text editing that checked all the boxes for us."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I chose this solution because it was cheaper than other competitors."

"There is a license required to use this solution and it costs approximately $10 per user a month. I am paying $300 a month for 30 licenses."

"The tool is available at a low price."

"In terms of how much AppSheet costs, I'm currently on the free tier, but if I need to add more users to it in the future, I will go with the paid version."

"We also pay for the managed services help that we get from them. But, to me, it is a very effective cost model. Licenses are relatively inexpensive, then you pay by the drink in terms of the managed services that you are going to need, which has been great. We figure out where we want to apply those services and try to be pretty diligent about managing the costs there."

"Compared to if I used traditional methods, such as hiring developers and setting up systems, VINYL is costing me less than half of what it would normally cost."

"The key thing here is that the pricing is just one price. We can do as much or as little with the product as we want to which is very attractive. I don't have to worry about if I build a new app, I have to pay more. Or, if I put 20 more people logging into the app, I don't have to pay any extra for that either."

"Pricing and licensing are expensive."

"It is affordable."

"The pricing is moderate. It's okay."

"The pricing and the licensing of Zudy are reasonable. Pricing is always a tricky thing. It could be a little simpler, but they're doing well. I'm happy with it."

"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which No-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Educational Organization

11%

University

11%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

15%

Consumer Goods Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppSheet?

If you are a Google Workspace user, you have AppSheet as part of the package, so you don't have to pay anything more to use it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AppSheet?

I do not have enough experience with AppSheet to make specific recommendations for improvements.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for AppSheet?

I am mainly an IT consultant for Google Workspace into small companies and nonprofit organizations. I work with different tools. However, 90% of my job revolves around Google Workspace.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Adalo vs AppSheet

Compared 24% of the time

ServiceNow vs AppSheet

Compared 20% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs AppSheet

Compared 20% of the time

Lovable vs AppSheet

Compared 20% of the time

Ragic vs AppSheet

Compared 17% of the time

More AppSheet Competitors

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 100% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AppSheet

August 2025

Download AppSheet product report

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

August 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Overview

AppSheet provides a no-code development platform for application software, which allows users to create mobile, tablet, and web applications using data sources like Google Drive, DropBox, Office 365, and other cloud-based spreadsheet and database platforms.

Google

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Sample Customers

Husqvarna, Solvay

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Buyer's Guide

AppSheet vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

July 2025

Free Report: AppSheet vs. Jitterbit Vinyl

Find out what your peers are saying about AppSheet vs. Jitterbit Vinyl and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AppSheet vs. Jitterbit Vinyl report.

See our list of best No-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all No-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.